Suppr超能文献

溶剂型胶去除剂对随后的指纹和 DNA 双重分析的影响。

Effects of solvent-based adhesive removal on the subsequent dual analysis of fingerprint and DNA.

机构信息

FDZ-Forensisches DNA Zentrallabor GmbH, Medical University of Vienna, Sensengasse 2, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Criminal Intelligence Service Austria, Department II/BK/6 Forensics, Unit II/BK/6.3.1 - Dactyloscopic Reference Laboratory, Josef-Holaubek-Platz 1, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Int J Legal Med. 2023 Sep;137(5):1373-1394. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03042-w. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

Abstract

The combined approach of classical fingerprinting and DNA profiling is a powerful tool in forensic investigations of latent "touch" traces. However, little attention has been paid to the organic solvents frequently used in dactyloscopic laboratories to facilitate the separation of adhesive evidence prior to fingerprint development and downstream effects on subsequent DNA profiling. In the present study, we tested a selection of adhesive removers (n = 9) and assessed their potential impact on DNA recovery and amplification by PCR. Thereby, we identified and characterized novel PCR inhibitors. All investigated chemicals contain volatile organic compounds that evaporate under normal indoor atmospheric conditions. Exposure to certain solvents resulted in increased DNA degradation, but only if evaporation was prevented. A series of adhesive-removal experiments were conducted with prepared mock evidence (self-adhesive postage stamps affixed to paper envelope) to investigate the impact of treatment time and the location of applied traces on DNA recovery and dactyloscopy, respectively. Due to the early onset of print decomposition, we found that only a short treatment time was compatible with the development of fingerprints on the adhesive side of a stamp. Solvents also removed DNA from the adhesive surface, thus resulting in a marked shift in the substrate distribution of recovered DNA from the stamp to the envelope, but not in the reverse direction. Furthermore, we observed that treatment with conventional fingerprint reagents lead to a significant reduction in the amounts of DNA recovered from stamps, while the additional use of adhesive removers did not significantly enhance this effect.

摘要

经典指纹分析与 DNA 分析联合方法是法医学中对潜在“触摸”痕迹进行检验的有力工具。然而,人们很少关注指掌纹实验室中经常使用的有机溶剂,这些溶剂有助于在指纹显现之前分离粘性证据,以及对后续 DNA 分析产生的下游影响。在本研究中,我们测试了一系列粘性去除剂(n=9),并评估了它们对 PCR 中 DNA 回收和扩增的潜在影响。由此,我们鉴定并描述了新的 PCR 抑制剂。所有研究的化学物质均含有在正常室内大气条件下蒸发的挥发性有机化合物。暴露于某些溶剂会导致 DNA 降解增加,但前提是要防止蒸发。我们进行了一系列粘性去除实验,用准备好的模拟证据(粘贴在纸信封上的自粘邮票)进行处理,分别研究处理时间和施加痕迹的位置对 DNA 回收和指纹学的影响。由于印刷品分解的早期发生,我们发现只有很短的处理时间才能与邮票粘性面的指纹显现兼容。溶剂还会从粘性表面去除 DNA,从而导致从邮票到信封的回收 DNA 的基质分布发生明显转移,但不会发生反向转移。此外,我们观察到常规指纹试剂的处理会导致从邮票中回收的 DNA 量显著减少,而额外使用粘性去除剂并没有显著增强这种效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96e1/10421768/649cd4e4e9f5/414_2023_3042_Fig1a_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验