School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Center of Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jul 4;9:e45324. doi: 10.2196/45324.
The causal relationship between blood pressure variability (BPV) and arterial stiffness remains debated.
This study aimed to explore the temporal and bidirectional associations between long-term BPV and arterial stiffness using a cohort design with multiple surveys.
Participants from the Beijing Health Management Cohort who underwent health examinations from visit 1 (2010-2011) to visit 5 (2018-2019) were enrolled in this study. Long-term BPV was defined as intraindividual variation using the coefficient of variation (CV) and SD. Arterial stiffness was measured by brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV). The bidirectional relationship between BPV and arterial stiffness was explored using cross-lagged analysis and linear regression models, with records before and after visit 3 categorized as phase 1 and phase 2, respectively.
Of the 1506 participants, who were a mean of 56.11 (SD 8.57) years old, 1148 (76.2%) were male. The cross-lagged analysis indicated that the standardized coefficients of BPV at phase 1 directing to the baPWV level at phase 2 were statistically significant but not vice-versa. The adjusted regression coefficients of the CV were 4.708 (95% CI 0.946-8.470) for systolic blood pressure, 3.119 (95% 0.166-6.073) for diastolic pressure, and 2.205 (95% CI 0.300-4.110) for pulse pressure. The coefficients of the SD were 4.208 (95% CI 0.177-8.239) for diastolic pressure and 4.247 (95% CI 0.448-8.046) for pulse pressure. The associations were predominant in the subgroup with hypertension, but we did not observe any significant association of baPWV level with subsequent BPV indices.
The findings supported a temporal relationship between long-term BPV and arterial stiffness level, especially among people with hypertension.
血压变异性(BPV)与动脉僵硬度之间的因果关系仍存在争议。
本研究旨在使用多轮调查的队列设计来探索长期 BPV 与动脉僵硬度之间的时间和双向关联。
本研究纳入了参加北京健康管理队列的参与者,他们在首轮(2010-2011 年)至第 5 轮(2018-2019 年)体检中接受了检查。使用变异系数(CV)和标准差(SD)来定义个体内变异的长期 BPV。肱踝脉搏波速度(baPWV)用于测量动脉僵硬度。使用交叉滞后分析和线性回归模型来探索 BPV 和动脉僵硬度之间的双向关系,将第 3 次检查之前和之后的记录分别归类为第 1 阶段和第 2 阶段。
在 1506 名参与者中,平均年龄为 56.11(8.57)岁,1148 名(76.2%)为男性。交叉滞后分析表明,第 1 阶段的 BPV 标准化系数指向第 2 阶段的 baPWV 水平具有统计学意义,但反之则不然。CV 的调整回归系数分别为收缩压 4.708(95%置信区间:0.946-8.470)、舒张压 3.119(95%置信区间:0.166-6.073)和脉压 2.205(95%置信区间:0.300-4.110)。SD 的系数分别为舒张压 4.208(95%置信区间:0.177-8.239)和脉压 4.247(95%置信区间:0.448-8.046)。这些关联主要见于高血压亚组中,但我们未观察到 baPWV 水平与随后的 BPV 指标之间存在任何显著关联。
研究结果支持长期 BPV 与动脉僵硬度水平之间存在时间关系,尤其是在高血压患者中。