Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.A.B., P.J.S., S.M., L.L.W., K.I., A.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (A.L.H.).
Circulation. 2021 Oct 12;144(15):1212-1226. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055329. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
Although lifestyle modifications generally are effective in lowering blood pressure (BP) among patients with unmedicated hypertension and in those treated with 1 or 2 antihypertensive agents, the value of exercise and diet for lowering BP in patients with resistant hypertension is unknown.
One hundred forty patients with resistant hypertension (mean age, 63 years; 48% female; 59% Black; 31% with diabetes; 21% with chronic kidney disease) were randomly assigned to a 4-month program of lifestyle modification (C-LIFE [Center-Based Lifestyle Intervention]) including dietary counseling, behavioral weight management, and exercise, or a single counseling session providing SEPA (Standardized Education and Physician Advice). The primary end point was clinic systolic BP; secondary end points included 24-hour ambulatory BP and select cardiovascular disease biomarkers including baroreflex sensitivity to quantify the influence of the baroreflex on heart rate, high-frequency heart rate variability to assess vagally mediated modulation of heart rate, flow-mediated dilation to evaluate endothelial function, pulse wave velocity to assess arterial stiffness, and left ventricular mass to characterize left ventricular structure.
Between-group comparisons revealed that the reduction in clinic systolic BP was greater in C-LIFE (-12.5 [95% CI, -14.9 to -10.2] mm Hg) compared with SEPA(-7.1 [-95% CI, 10.4 to -3.7] mm Hg) (=0.005); 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP also was reduced in C-LIFE (-7.0 [95% CI, -8.5 to -4.0] mm Hg), with no change in SEPA (-0.3 [95% CI, -4.0 to 3.4] mm Hg) (=0.001). Compared with SEPA, C-LIFE resulted in greater improvements in resting baroreflex sensitivity (2.3 ms/mm Hg [95% CI, 1.3 to 3.3] versus -1.1 ms/mm Hg [95% CI, -2.5 to 0.3]; <0.001), high-frequency heart rate variability (0.4 ln ms [95% CI, 0.2 to 0.6] versus -0.2 ln ms [95% CI, -0.5 to 0.1]; <0.001), and flow-mediated dilation (0.3% [95% CI, -0.3 to 1.0] versus -1.4% [95% CI, -2.5 to -0.3]; =0.022). There were no between-group differences in pulse wave velocity (=0.958) or left ventricular mass (=0.596).
Diet and exercise can lower BP in patients with resistant hypertension. A 4-month structured program of diet and exercise as adjunctive therapy delivered in a cardiac rehabilitation setting results in significant reductions in clinic and ambulatory BP and improvement in selected cardiovascular disease biomarkers. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02342808.
虽然生活方式的改变通常可以有效降低未经药物治疗的高血压患者和服用 1 或 2 种降压药物的患者的血压,但运动和饮食对抵抗性高血压患者降低血压的价值尚不清楚。
140 例抵抗性高血压患者(平均年龄 63 岁;48%为女性;59%为黑人;31%患有糖尿病;21%患有慢性肾脏病)被随机分配到为期 4 个月的生活方式改变计划(C-LIFE [基于中心的生活方式干预]),包括饮食咨询、行为体重管理和运动,或接受单次咨询,提供 SEPA(标准化教育和医生建议)。主要终点是诊所收缩压;次要终点包括 24 小时动态血压和选择心血管疾病生物标志物,包括压力感受性反射灵敏度,以量化压力感受性反射对心率的影响,高频心率变异性,以评估心率的迷走神经介导调节,血流介导的扩张,以评估内皮功能,脉搏波速度,以评估动脉僵硬,以及左心室质量,以描述左心室结构。
组间比较显示,C-LIFE 组的诊所收缩压降低幅度大于 SEPA 组(-12.5[95%CI,-14.9 至-10.2]mmHg)(=0.005);C-LIFE 组 24 小时动态收缩压也降低(-7.0[95%CI,-8.5 至-4.0]mmHg),SEPA 组无变化(-0.3[95%CI,-4.0 至 3.4]mmHg)(=0.001)。与 SEPA 相比,C-LIFE 导致静息压力感受性反射灵敏度(2.3ms/mm Hg[95%CI,1.3 至 3.3]vs.-1.1ms/mm Hg[95%CI,-2.5 至 0.3])、高频心率变异性(0.4ln ms[95%CI,0.2 至 0.6]vs.-0.2ln ms[95%CI,-0.5 至 0.1])和血流介导的扩张(0.3%[95%CI,-0.3 至 1.0]vs.-1.4%[95%CI,-2.5 至-0.3])均有更大的改善(<0.001)。脉搏波速度(=0.958)或左心室质量(=0.596)无组间差异。
饮食和运动可以降低抵抗性高血压患者的血压。在心脏康复环境中,作为辅助治疗的为期 4 个月的饮食和运动结构化方案可显著降低诊所和动态血压,并改善选定的心血管疾病生物标志物。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT02342808。