• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安立生坦和波生坦用于小儿肺动脉高压的成本效益分析

Cost-utility of ambrisentan and bosentan for pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension.

作者信息

Buendia Jefferson Antonio, Patino Diana Guerrero, Lindarte Erika Fernanda

机构信息

Research Group in Pharmacology and Toxicology"INFARTO". Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.

Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(8):967-973. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2233698. Epub 2023 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1080/14737167.2023.2233698
PMID:37403496
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite the increasing evidence supporting the efficacy of ambrisentan and bosentan in improving functional classes among pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), there is a lack of information regarding their cost implications. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess the cost-utility of bosentan compared to ambrisentan for the treatment of pediatric patients with PAH in Colombia.

METHODS

We employed a Markov model to estimate the costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with the use of ambrisentan or bosentan in pediatric patients diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). To ensure the reliability of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the model. In our cost-effectiveness analysis, we evaluated the outcomes at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$5,180.

RESULTS

The expected annual cost per patient receiving ambrisentan was estimated to be $16,055 (95% CI 15,937 -16,172), while for bosentan it was $14,503 (95% CI 14,489 -14,615). The QALYs per person estimated for ambrisentan were 0.39 (95% CI 0.381-0.382), whereas for bosentan it was 0.40 (95% CI 0.401-0.403).

CONCLUSION

Our economic evaluation shows that ambrisentan is not cost-effective regarding bosentan to in treating pulmonary arterial hypertension in C.

摘要

引言

尽管越来越多的证据支持安立生坦和波生坦在改善儿童肺动脉高压(PAH)患者功能分级方面的疗效,但关于它们的成本影响却缺乏相关信息。因此,本研究的目的是评估在哥伦比亚,与安立生坦相比,波生坦治疗儿童PAH患者的成本效益。

方法

我们采用马尔可夫模型来估计在诊断为肺动脉高压(PAH)的儿童患者中使用安立生坦或波生坦的成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)。为确保研究结果的可靠性,我们进行了敏感性分析以评估模型的稳健性。在成本效益分析中,我们在支付意愿(WTP)阈值为5180美元的情况下评估结果。

结果

预计接受安立生坦治疗的每位患者每年成本估计为16,055美元(95%CI 15,937 - 16,172),而波生坦为14,503美元(95%CI 14,489 - 14,615)。安立生坦估计的人均QALY为0.39(95%CI 0.381 - 0.382),而波生坦为0.40(95%CI 0.401 - 0.403)。

结论

我们的经济评估表明,在哥伦比亚治疗肺动脉高压方面,与波生坦相比,安立生坦不具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost-utility of ambrisentan and bosentan for pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension.安立生坦和波生坦用于小儿肺动脉高压的成本效益分析
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(8):967-973. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2233698. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
2
Ambrisentan for in pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: A cost-utility analysis.安立生坦用于小儿肺动脉高压:一项成本效用分析。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023 May;58(5):1562-1568. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26361. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
3
Oral therapies for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a population-based cost-minimization analysis.用于治疗肺动脉高压的口服疗法:一项基于人群的成本最小化分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2009;7(1):43-59. doi: 10.1007/BF03256141.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Macitentan in Comparison With Bosentan in the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Iran.在伊朗,马昔腾坦与波生坦治疗肺动脉高压的成本效益分析。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2023 Mar;34:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2022.10.001. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
5
Comparative assessment of efficacy and safety of ambrisentan and bosentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: A meta-analysis.比较安立生坦和波生坦治疗肺动脉高压患者的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022 Feb;47(2):146-156. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13481. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
6
Systematic review and cost-effectiveness of bosentan and sildenafil as therapeutic drugs for pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension.波生坦和西地那非作为儿科肺动脉高压治疗药物的系统评价和成本效益分析。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 Jul;56(7):2250-2258. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25427. Epub 2021 May 3.
7
Comparative adherence of macitentan versus ambrisentan and bosentan in Australian patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a retrospective real-world database study.澳大利亚肺动脉高压患者中美他生坦与安立生坦和波生坦的依从性比较:一项回顾性真实世界数据库研究。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):596-604. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2328483. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
8
Clinical safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of ambrisentan therapy in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension.安立生坦治疗儿童肺动脉高压的临床安全性、药代动力学和疗效。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2013 Jan;48(1):27-34. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22555. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
9
A Focus on Macitentan in the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.关注马昔腾坦在肺动脉高压治疗中的应用。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018 Aug;123(2):103-113. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13033. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
10
[Efficacy and safety of endothelin receptor antagonists combined with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a network meta-analysis].内皮素受体拮抗剂联合磷酸二酯酶5抑制剂治疗肺动脉高压的疗效与安全性:一项网状Meta分析
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2022 Feb 12;45(2):158-170. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20210707-00473.