Pickering Marie-Eva, Javier Rose-Marie, Malochet Sandrine, Pickering Gisele, Desmeules Jules
Rheumatology Department, CHU Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur et Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Eur J Pain. 2024 Jan;28(1):3-20. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2156. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
Anti-osteoporosis (OP) drugs have been suggested to contribute to pain reduction during OP management. This scoping review aimed at mapping the literature on pain relief with anti-OP drugs in OP treatment.
Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane databases were searched by two reviewers with keywords combinations. Randomized controlled and real-life English studies, pain as an endpoint, antiosteoporosis drugs were inclusion criteria. Case reports, surveys, comment letters, conference abstracts, animal studies and grey literature were excluded. Predetermined data were extracted by two reviewers and disagreement solved through discussion.
A total of 130 articles were identified, 31 publications were included, 12 randomized clinical trials and 19 observational studies. Pain reduction was assessed by different tools: Visual Analogue Scale, Verbal Rating Scale, Facial Scale or as a domain of quality of life questionnaires including Short form 8, 36, mini-OP, Japanese OP, Qualeffo, Roland Morris Disability questionnaires. Collective data show that anti-OP drugs may display an analgesic effect that may be linked to the local mode of action of drugs on bone and consecutive modulation of pain sensitization. The methodology of the studies showed a heterogeneity of endpoints, comparators, statistical approaches and follow-up duration.
Considering the limitations of the literature, there is a need for more rigorous trials and larger real-life studies taking into account the recommendations published for research in rheumatology and in pain medicine. The identification of responders, patient subtypes, and of analgesic-effect doses would allow optimization and individualization for pain relief in patients with OP.
This scoping review shows that anti-OP drugs may improve pain and quality of life of patients with OP. The heterogeneity in design, choice of endpoints, methodology, comparators and follow-up duration of included randomized clinical trials and real-life studies does not allow so far to identify a predominant antiosteoporosis drug or an optimal dosage for pain relief. These gaps need to be addressed and warrant further research in the future for optimizing pain improvement in the course of OP drug treatment.
抗骨质疏松(OP)药物被认为有助于在骨质疏松症治疗期间减轻疼痛。本综述旨在梳理有关抗OP药物在OP治疗中缓解疼痛的文献。
两名审阅者使用关键词组合在Medline、Pubmed和Cochrane数据库中进行检索。纳入标准为随机对照和真实世界的英文研究,以疼痛作为终点指标,使用抗骨质疏松药物。排除病例报告、调查、评论信、会议摘要、动物研究和灰色文献。两名审阅者提取预定数据,分歧通过讨论解决。
共识别出130篇文章,纳入3l篇出版物,其中12项随机临床试验和19项观察性研究。通过不同工具评估疼痛减轻情况:视觉模拟量表、语言评定量表、面部量表,或作为生活质量问卷的一个领域,包括简短健康调查问卷8项版、36项版、小型OP问卷、日本OP问卷、Qualeffo问卷、罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷。汇总数据表明,抗OP药物可能具有镇痛作用,这可能与药物对骨骼的局部作用方式以及对疼痛敏化的连续调节有关。研究方法显示终点指标、对照、统计方法和随访持续时间存在异质性。
考虑到文献的局限性,需要进行更严格的试验和更大规模的真实世界研究,同时考虑到风湿病学和疼痛医学研究已发表的建议。识别出反应者、患者亚型以及镇痛效应剂量,将有助于优化和个体化OP患者的疼痛缓解方案。
本综述表明,抗OP药物可能改善OP患者的疼痛和生活质量。纳入的随机临床试验和真实世界研究在设计、终点指标选择、方法、对照和随访持续时间方面存在异质性,目前尚无法确定一种主要的抗骨质疏松药物或最佳镇痛剂量。这些差距需要得到解决,未来有必要进行进一步研究,以优化OP药物治疗过程中的疼痛改善情况。