Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208042, Tompkin's East 2, New Haven, CT 06510.
Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Dec;221(6):836-845. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29617. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
CT with CTA is widely used to exclude stroke in patients with dizziness, although MRI has higher sensitivity. The purpose of this article was to compare patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with dizziness who undergo CT with CTA alone versus those who undergo MRI in terms of stroke-related management and outcomes. This retrospective study included 1917 patients (mean age, 59.5 years; 776 men, 1141 women) presenting to the ED with dizziness from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. A first propensity score matching analysis incorporated demographic characteristics, medical history, findings from the review of systems, physical examination findings, and symptoms to construct matched groups of patients discharged from the ED after undergoing head CT with head and neck CTA alone and patients who underwent brain MRI (with or without CT and CTA). Outcomes were compared. A second analysis compared matched patients discharged after CT with CTA alone and patients who underwent specialized abbreviated MRI using multiplanar high-resolution DWI for increased sensitivity for posterior circulation stroke. Sensitivity analyses were performed involving MRI examinations performed as the first or only neuroimaging examination and involving alternative matching and imputation techniques. In the first analysis (406 patients per group), patients who underwent MRI, compared with patients who underwent CT with CTA alone, showed greater frequency of critical neuroimaging results (10.1% vs 4.7%, = .005), change in secondary stroke prevention medication (9.6% vs 3.2%, = .001), and subsequent echocardiography evaluation (6.4% vs 1.0%, < .001). In the second analysis (100 patients per group), patients who underwent specialized abbreviated MRI, compared with patients who underwent CT with CTA alone, showed greater frequency of critical neuroimaging results (10.0% vs 2.0%, = .04), change in secondary stroke prevention medication (14.0% vs 1.0%, = .001), and subsequent echocardiography evaluation (12.0% vs 2.0%, = .01) and lower frequency of 90-day ED readmissions (12.0% vs 28.0%, = .008). Sensitivity analyses showed qualitatively similar findings. A proportion of patients discharged after CT with CTA alone may have benefitted from alternative or additional evaluation by MRI (including MRI using a specialized abbreviated protocol). Use of MRI may motivate clinically impactful management changes in patients presenting with dizziness.
CT 加 CTA 广泛用于排除头晕患者的中风,尽管 MRI 的敏感度更高。本文的目的是比较因头晕到急诊科就诊的患者中,单独行 CT 加 CTA 检查者与单独行 MRI 检查者的中风相关管理和结局。这项回顾性研究纳入了 1917 例 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日因头晕到急诊科就诊的患者(平均年龄 59.5 岁;776 例男性,1141 例女性)。首次倾向评分匹配分析纳入了人口统计学特征、病史、系统回顾结果、体格检查结果和症状,以构建单独行头部 CT 加头颈部 CTA 检查后从急诊科出院的患者和行脑部 MRI(包括 CT 和 CTA)的患者匹配组。比较了结局。第二项分析比较了单独行 CT 加 CTA 检查后出院的匹配患者和使用多平面高分辨率 DWI 进行专门简化 MRI 检查的患者,以提高对后循环中风的敏感性。进行了敏感性分析,包括 MRI 检查作为首次或唯一神经影像学检查,以及涉及替代匹配和插补技术的分析。在首次分析(每组 406 例患者)中,与单独行 CT 加 CTA 检查者相比,行 MRI 检查者更频繁地出现关键神经影像学结果(10.1%比 4.7%,.005)、改变二级卒中预防药物(9.6%比 3.2%,.001)和随后的超声心动图评估(6.4%比 1.0%,.001)。在第二次分析(每组 100 例患者)中,与单独行 CT 加 CTA 检查者相比,行专门简化 MRI 检查者更频繁地出现关键神经影像学结果(10.0%比 2.0%,.04)、改变二级卒中预防药物(14.0%比 1.0%,.001)和随后的超声心动图评估(12.0%比 2.0%,.01),90 天内急诊科再入院率更低(12.0%比 28.0%,.008)。敏感性分析显示出定性相似的结果。一部分单独行 CT 加 CTA 检查后出院的患者可能受益于 MRI(包括使用专门简化方案的 MRI)的替代或额外评估。MRI 的使用可能会促使头晕患者的临床管理发生有意义的改变。