Townsend William, Hiddemann Wolfgang, Buske Christian, Cartron Guillaume, Cunningham David, Dyer Martin J S, Gribben John G, Phillips Elizabeth H, Dreyling Martin, Seymour John F, Grigg Andrew, Trotman Judith, Lin Tong-Yu, Hong Xiao-Nan, Kingbiel Dirk, Nielsen Tina G, Knapp Andrea, Herold Michael, Marcus Robert
Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College Hospitals London, United Kingdom.
Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Germany.
Hemasphere. 2023 Jun 30;7(7):e919. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000919. eCollection 2023 Jul.
The phase III GALLIUM trial assessed the safety and efficacy of obinutuzumab-based versus rituximab-based immunochemotherapy in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL) or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). At the primary analysis, the trial met its primary end point, demonstrating improvement in investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) with obinutuzumab-based versus rituximab-based immunochemotherapy in patients with FL. We report the results of the final analysis in the FL population, with an additional exploratory analysis in the MZL subgroup. Overall, 1202 patients with FL were randomized 1:1 to obinutuzumab- or rituximab-based immunochemotherapy followed by maintenance with the same antibody for up to 2 years. After a median 7.9 (range, 0.0-9.8) years of follow-up, PFS remained improved with obinutuzumab- versus rituximab-based immunochemotherapy, with 7-year PFS rates of 63.4% versus 55.7% ( = 0.006). Time-to-next antilymphoma treatment was also improved (74.1% versus 65.4% of patients had not started their next antilymphoma treatment at 7 y; = 0.001). Overall survival was similar between the arms (88.5% versus 87.2%; = 0.36). Irrespective of the treatment received, PFS and OS were higher in patients with a complete molecular response (CMR) versus those with no CMR ( < 0.001). Serious adverse events were reported in 48.9% and 43.4% of patients in the obinutuzumab and rituximab arms, respectively; there was no difference in the rate of fatal adverse events (4.4% and 4.5%, respectively). No new safety signals were reported. These data demonstrate the long-term benefit of obinutuzumab-based immunochemotherapy and confirm its role as a standard-of-care for the first-line treatment of advanced-stage FL, taking into account patient characteristics and safety considerations.
III期GALLIUM试验评估了以奥妥珠单抗为基础的免疫化疗与以利妥昔单抗为基础的免疫化疗在先前未接受治疗的滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)或边缘区淋巴瘤(MZL)患者中的安全性和疗效。在初步分析中,该试验达到了其主要终点,表明在FL患者中,与以利妥昔单抗为基础的免疫化疗相比,以奥妥珠单抗为基础的免疫化疗在研究者评估的无进展生存期(PFS)方面有改善。我们报告了FL人群的最终分析结果,并在MZL亚组中进行了额外的探索性分析。总体而言,1202例FL患者按1:1随机分组,接受以奥妥珠单抗或利妥昔单抗为基础的免疫化疗,随后用相同抗体维持治疗长达2年。经过中位7.9年(范围0.0 - 9.8年)的随访,与以利妥昔单抗为基础的免疫化疗相比,以奥妥珠单抗为基础的免疫化疗的PFS仍然有所改善,7年PFS率分别为63.4%和55.7%(P = 0.006)。至下一次抗淋巴瘤治疗的时间也有所改善(7年时,74.1%的患者与65.4%的患者尚未开始下一次抗淋巴瘤治疗;P = 0.001)。两组的总生存期相似(88.5%对87.2%;P = 0.36)。无论接受何种治疗,完全分子缓解(CMR)的患者的PFS和总生存期(OS)均高于无CMR的患者(P < 0.001)。奥妥珠单抗组和利妥昔单抗组分别有48.9%和43.4%的患者报告了严重不良事件;致命不良事件发生率无差异(分别为4.4%和4.5%)。未报告新的安全信号。这些数据证明了以奥妥珠单抗为基础的免疫化疗的长期益处,并确认了其作为晚期FL一线治疗的标准治疗方法的作用,同时考虑到患者特征和安全性因素。