文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

多少证据才足够?研究资助者寻求监管机构接受数字健康技术衍生终点的经历。

How Much Evidence Is Enough? Research Sponsor Experiences Seeking Regulatory Acceptance of Digital Health Technology-Derived Endpoints.

作者信息

Perry Brian, Kehoe Lindsay, Swezey Teresa, Le Masne Quentin, Goldhahn Jörg, Staley Alicia, Corneli Amy

机构信息

Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Digit Biomark. 2023 Jun 8;7(1):45-53. doi: 10.1159/000529878. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.


DOI:10.1159/000529878
PMID:37404865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10315005/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Digital health technologies (DHTs) provide opportunities for real-time data collection and assessment of patient function. However, use of DHT-derived endpoints in clinical trials to support medical product labelling claims is limited. METHODS: From November 2020 through March 2021, the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews with sponsors of clinical trials that used DHT-derived endpoints. We aimed to learn about their experiences, including their interactions with regulators and the challenges they encountered. Using applied thematic analysis, we identified barriers to and recommendations for using DHT-derived endpoints in pivotal trials. RESULTS: Sponsors identified five key challenges to incorporating DHT-derived endpoints in clinical trials. These included (1) a need for additional regulatory clarity specific to DHT-derived endpoints, (2) the official clinical outcome assessment qualification process being impractical for the biopharmaceutical industry, (3) a lack of comparator clinical endpoints, (4) a lack of validated DHTs and algorithms for concepts of interest, and (5) a lack of operational support from DHT vendors. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: CTTI shared the interview findings with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and during a multi-stakeholder expert meeting. Based on these discussions, we provide several new and revised tools to aid sponsors in using DHT-derived endpoints in pivotal trials to support labelling claims.

摘要

引言:数字健康技术(DHTs)为实时收集和评估患者功能提供了机会。然而,在临床试验中使用源自DHT的终点来支持医疗产品标签声明的情况有限。 方法:2020年11月至2021年3月,临床试验转型倡议(CTTI)进行了一项定性描述性研究,对使用源自DHT终点的临床试验申办者进行半结构化访谈。我们旨在了解他们的经验,包括他们与监管机构的互动以及遇到的挑战。通过应用主题分析,我们确定了在关键试验中使用源自DHT终点的障碍和建议。 结果:申办者确定了将源自DHT的终点纳入临床试验的五个关键挑战。这些挑战包括:(1)需要针对源自DHT的终点有更多监管明确性;(2)官方临床结局评估资格认定过程对生物制药行业不切实际;(3)缺乏对照临床终点;(4)缺乏针对感兴趣概念的经过验证的DHT和算法;(5)DHT供应商缺乏运营支持。 讨论/结论:CTTI在一次多利益相关方专家会议期间,与美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)分享了访谈结果。基于这些讨论,我们提供了几个新的和修订的工具,以帮助申办者在关键试验中使用源自DHT的终点来支持标签声明。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3b0/10315005/ee92aadc6269/dib-2023-0007-0001-529878_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3b0/10315005/ee92aadc6269/dib-2023-0007-0001-529878_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3b0/10315005/ee92aadc6269/dib-2023-0007-0001-529878_F01.jpg

相似文献

[1]
How Much Evidence Is Enough? Research Sponsor Experiences Seeking Regulatory Acceptance of Digital Health Technology-Derived Endpoints.

Digit Biomark. 2023-6-8

[2]
Tepid Uptake of Digital Health Technologies in Clinical Trials by Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Firms.

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024-5

[3]
Digital Health Technology (DHT) in European Clinical Trials, How to Improve the Status-Quo of the Regulatory Landscape?

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024-7

[4]
Digital health technology derived measures: Biomarkers or clinical outcome assessments?

Clin Transl Sci. 2023-7

[5]
Digital technologies: Innovations that transform the face of drug development.

Clin Transl Sci. 2023-8

[6]
Lessons for Vietnam on the Use of Digital Technologies to Support Patient-Centered Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in the Asia-Pacific Region: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-4-5

[7]
Regulatory Pathways for Qualification and Acceptance of Digital Health Technology-Derived Clinical Trial Endpoints: Considerations for Sponsors.

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025-1

[8]
Digital endpoints in clinical trials: emerging themes from a multi-stakeholder Knowledge Exchange event.

Trials. 2024-8-3

[9]
Digital Health Technologies in Clinical Trials: An Ontology-Driven Analysis to Inform Digital Sustainability Policies.

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023-11

[10]
Digital Tools-Regulatory Considerations for Application in Clinical Trials.

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Digital Health Technologies for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Initial Results from a Landscape Analysis and Community Collaborative Effort.

J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024

[2]
Unleashing the full potential of digital outcome measures in clinical trials: eight questions that need attention.

BMC Med. 2024-9-27

[3]
In-Clinic and Natural Gait Observations master protocol (I-CAN-GO) to validate gait using a lumbar accelerometer.

Sci Rep. 2024-8-29

[4]
Innovative research methodologies in the EU regulatory framework: an analysis of EMA qualification procedures from a pediatric perspective.

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024-3-28

[5]
A proposed multi-domain, digital model for capturing functional status and health-related quality of life in oncology.

Clin Transl Sci. 2024-1

[6]
Incorporating digitally derived endpoints within clinical development programs by leveraging prior work.

NPJ Digit Med. 2023-8-10

本文引用的文献

[1]
Mobility endpoints in marketing authorisation of drugs: what gets the European medicines agency moving?

Age Ageing. 2022-1-6

[2]
Digital Endpoints: Definition, Benefits, and Current Barriers in Accelerating Development and Adoption.

Digit Biomark. 2021-9-13

[3]
Developing a Novel Measurement of Sleep in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Study Proposal for Approach and Considerations.

Digit Biomark. 2021-9-2

[4]
Evaluation, Acceptance, and Qualification of Digital Measures: From Proof of Concept to Endpoint.

Digit Biomark. 2021-3-23

[5]
Investigator Experiences Using Mobile Technologies in Clinical Research: Qualitative Descriptive Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-2-12

[6]
Digital health technologies in clinical trials for central nervous system drugs: an EU regulatory perspective.

Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021-2

[7]
Development of Novel, Value-Based, Digital Endpoints for Clinical Trials: A Structured Approach Toward Fit-for-Purpose Validation.

Pharmacol Rev. 2020-10

[8]
Verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation (V3): the foundation of determining fit-for-purpose for Biometric Monitoring Technologies (BioMeTs).

NPJ Digit Med. 2020-4-14

[9]
Quantifying the use of connected digital products in clinical research.

NPJ Digit Med. 2020-4-3

[10]
Considerations for development of an evidence dossier to support the use of mobile sensor technology for clinical outcome assessments in clinical trials.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2020-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索