Gruenberger Eric H, Vatsia Sohrab K, Stay Rourke M, Kersey Cameron, Khan Mudassar A, Pahl Douglas W
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2023 Jul 1;15:77875. doi: 10.52965/001c.77875. eCollection 2023.
BACKGROUND: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of age-related spinal cord dysfunction worldwide. Despite the widespread use of provocative physical exam maneuvers in the workup of DCM, the clinical significance of Hoffmann's sign is controversial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of Hoffmann's sign for DCM in a cohort of patients treated by a single spine surgeon. MATERIALS & METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of a Hoffmann sign on physical examination. Advanced imaging studies were independently reviewed by four raters for confirmation of a diagnosis of cervical cord compression. Prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood, and relative risk ratios for the Hoffmann sign were calculated, with subsequent Chi-square and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis to further characterize correlative findings. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included - of whom, thirty-four (58.6%) patients presented with a Hoffmann sign, and eleven (21.1%) patients demonstrated cord compression on imaging. The Hoffmann sign demonstrated a sensitivity of 20% and a specificity of 35.7% (LR = 0.32; 0.16-1.16). Chi-square analysis revealed that imaging findings positive for cord compression were proportionally greater for patients lacking a Hoffmann sign than those with a confirmed Hoffmann sign ( =0.032) ROC analysis demonstrated that a negative Hoffmann sign performed moderately well in predicting cord compression (AUC.721; =0.031). CONCLUSIONS: The Hoffmann sign is an unreliable marker for cervical cord compression, and the lack of a Hoffmann sign may be more predictive of cervical cord compression.
背景:退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)是全球与年龄相关的脊髓功能障碍的最常见原因。尽管在DCM的检查中广泛使用激发性体格检查手法,但霍夫曼征的临床意义仍存在争议。 目的:本研究的目的是前瞻性评估霍夫曼征在一组由单一脊柱外科医生治疗的患者中对DCM的诊断性能。 材料与方法:根据体格检查时是否存在霍夫曼征将患者分为两组。由四名评估者独立复查高级影像学研究,以确认颈椎脊髓受压的诊断。计算霍夫曼征的患病率、敏感性、特异性、似然比和相对风险比,随后进行卡方检验和受试者操作特征(ROC)分析,以进一步描述相关发现。 结果:纳入52例患者,其中34例(58.6%)患者出现霍夫曼征,11例(21.1%)患者影像学显示脊髓受压。霍夫曼征的敏感性为20%,特异性为35.7%(LR=0.32;0.16-1.16)。卡方分析显示,缺乏霍夫曼征的患者脊髓受压影像学阳性结果的比例高于霍夫曼征确诊的患者(=0.032)。ROC分析表明,霍夫曼征阴性在预测脊髓受压方面表现中等(AUC.721;=0.031)。 结论:霍夫曼征是颈椎脊髓受压的不可靠标志物,缺乏霍夫曼征可能更能预测颈椎脊髓受压。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2023-7-1
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015-4-1
Iowa Orthop J. 2001
J Man Manip Ther. 2022-12
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008-9
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018-12-1
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001-1-1
Nat Rev Neurol. 2020-1-23
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018-12-1
Yale J Biol Med. 2018-3-28
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015-6-15
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015-4-1
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012
J Man Manip Ther. 2010-12
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010-10-1
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010-4-20