Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, PB 340, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;49(7):831-839. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07141-5. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
Recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) administered for traumatic brain injury (TBI) may increase short-term survival, but the long-term effect is unknown.
We conducted a pre-planned long-term follow-up of patients in the multicentre erythropoietin in TBI trial (2010-2015). We invited survivors to follow-up and evaluated survival and functional outcome with the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) (categories 5-8 = good outcome), and secondly, with good outcome determined relative to baseline function (sliding scale). We used survival analysis to assess time to death and absolute risk differences (ARD) to assess favorable outcomes. We categorized TBI severity with the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI model. Heterogeneity of treatment effects were assessed with interaction p-values based on the following a priori defined subgroups, the severity of TBI, and the presence of an intracranial mass lesion and multi-trauma in addition to TBI.
Of 603 patients in the original trial, 487 patients had survival data; 356 were included in the follow-up at a median of 6 years from injury. There was no difference between treatment groups for patient survival [EPO vs placebo hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 (0.47-1.14) p = 0.17]. Good outcome rates were 110/175 (63%) in the EPO group vs 100/181 (55%) in the placebo group (ARD 8%, 95% CI [Formula: see text] 3 to 18%, p = 0.14). When good outcome was determined relative to baseline risk, the EPO groups had better GOSE (sliding scale ARD 12%, 95% CI 2-22%, p = 0.02). When considering long-term patient survival, there was no evidence for heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) according to severity of TBI (p = 0.85), presence of an intracranial mass lesion (p = 0.48), or whether the patient had multi-trauma in addition to TBI (p = 0.08). Similarly, no evidence of treatment heterogeneity was seen for the effect of EPO on functional outcome.
EPO neither decreased overall long-term mortality nor improved functional outcome in moderate or severe TBI patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). The limited sample size makes it difficult to make final conclusions about the use of EPO in TBI.
外伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者应用重组促红细胞生成素(EPO)可能会增加短期存活率,但长期效果尚不清楚。
我们对多中心促红细胞生成素治疗 TBI 试验(2010-2015 年)中的患者进行了预先计划的长期随访。我们邀请幸存者进行随访,并使用格拉斯哥结局量表扩展版(GOSE)(5-8 分为良好结局)评估生存和功能结局,其次,根据基线功能(滑动量表)确定良好结局。我们使用生存分析评估死亡时间和绝对风险差异(ARD),以评估有利结局。我们使用国际 TBI 预后和分析临床试验任务模型对 TBI 严重程度进行分类。根据以下预先定义的亚组,使用交互 p 值评估治疗效果的异质性,亚组包括 TBI 严重程度、颅内肿块病变和 TBI 以外的多发创伤。
在原始试验的 603 名患者中,有 487 名患者有生存数据;在受伤后中位数 6 年时,有 356 名患者接受了随访。治疗组之间的患者生存率无差异[EPO 与安慰剂的危险比(HR)(95%置信区间(CI)0.73(0.47-1.14),p=0.17]。EPO 组的良好结局率为 175 例中的 110 例(63%),安慰剂组为 181 例中的 100 例(55%)(ARD 8%,95%CI [Formula: see text] 3 至 18%,p=0.14)。当根据基线风险确定良好结局时,EPO 组的 GOSE 更好(滑动量表 ARD 12%,95%CI 2-22%,p=0.02)。考虑到长期患者生存率,根据 TBI 严重程度(p=0.85)、颅内肿块病变存在(p=0.48)或患者是否除 TBI 外还伴有多发创伤(p=0.08),没有证据表明治疗效果存在异质性。同样,在 EPO 对功能结局的影响方面,也没有证据表明存在治疗异质性。
在重症监护病房(ICU)接受治疗的中重度 TBI 患者中,EPO 既不能降低总体长期死亡率,也不能改善功能结局。有限的样本量使得难以对 TBI 中 EPO 的使用得出最终结论。