Department of Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.197 Second Ruijin Street, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
BMC Neurol. 2020 Nov 2;20(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01958-z.
Recent studies regarding the effects of erythropoietin (EPO) for treating traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been inconsistent. This study conducts a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the safety and efficacy of EPO for TBI patients at various follow-up time points.
A literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library for RCTs studying EPO in TBI patients published through March 2019. Non-English manuscripts and non-human studies were excluded. The assessed outcomes include mortality, neurological recovery and associated adverse effects. Dichotomous variables are presented as risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
A total of seven RCTs involving 1197 TBI patients (611 treated with EPO, 586 treated with placebo) were included in this study. Compared to the placebo arm, treatment with EPO did not improve acute hospital mortality or short-term mortality. However, there was a significant improvement in mid-term (6 months) follow-up survival rates. EPO administration was not associated with neurological function improvement. Regarding adverse effects, EPO treatment did not increase the incidence of thromboembolic events or other associated adverse events.
This meta-analysis indicates a slight mortality benefit for TBI patients treated with EPO at mid-term follow-up. EPO does not improve in-hospital mortality, nor does it increase adverse events including thrombotic, cardiovascular and other associated complications. Our analysis did not demonstrate a significant beneficial effect of EPO intervention on the recovery of neurological function. Future RCTs are required to further characterize the use of EPO in TBI.
最近关于促红细胞生成素(EPO)治疗创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的研究结果并不一致。本研究对随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析,以评估 EPO 在不同随访时间点治疗 TBI 患者的安全性和疗效。
通过 PubMed、Web of Science、MEDLINE、Embase、Google Scholar 和 Cochrane Library 对 2019 年 3 月前发表的关于 EPO 治疗 TBI 患者的 RCT 进行文献检索。排除非英文文献和非人类研究。评估的结局包括死亡率、神经功能恢复和相关不良反应。二分类变量以风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)表示。
共纳入 7 项 RCT,涉及 1197 例 TBI 患者(611 例接受 EPO 治疗,586 例接受安慰剂治疗)。与安慰剂组相比,EPO 治疗并未改善急性住院死亡率或短期死亡率。然而,EPO 治疗组在中期(6 个月)随访生存率方面有显著提高。EPO 治疗与神经功能改善无关。关于不良反应,EPO 治疗并未增加血栓栓塞事件或其他相关不良反应的发生率。
本荟萃分析表明,EPO 治疗 TBI 患者在中期随访时具有轻微的死亡率获益。EPO 既不能改善住院死亡率,也不会增加血栓形成、心血管等相关并发症等不良反应。我们的分析并未显示 EPO 干预对神经功能恢复有显著的有益作用。需要进一步的 RCT 来进一步确定 EPO 在 TBI 中的应用。