• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分诊的新概念。

New concepts in triage.

作者信息

Vayer J S, Ten Eyck R P, Cowan M L

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Aug;15(8):927-30. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80677-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80677-1
PMID:3740579
Abstract

The triage process is a valid concept in the initial approach to multiple casualties. Triage tags are, in theory, a reasonable adjunct to the process, but have proved to be a failure in practice. Based on the historical perspective and on the authors' experience with approximately 180 mass casualty drills and incidents, it is recommended that the "daily routine doctrine" be applied and that conventional, color-coded triage tags be replaced by a process of "geographical triage." A valid model for disaster planning is needed, and organizers must conduct drills that are based on the actual threat to the community in order to determine the most efficacious way to manage medical response.

摘要

在处理多名伤员的初始阶段,分诊流程是一个有效的概念。理论上,分诊标签是该流程合理的辅助工具,但在实践中已被证明是失败的。基于历史视角以及作者参与约180次大规模伤亡演练和事件的经验,建议采用“日常规程原则”,并用“地理分诊”流程取代传统的彩色编码分诊标签。需要一个有效的灾难规划模型,组织者必须开展基于对社区实际威胁的演练,以确定管理医疗应对的最有效方式。

相似文献

1
New concepts in triage.分诊的新概念。
Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Aug;15(8):927-30. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80677-1.
2
[Triage--and the management of mass casualty incidents].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(5):411-3. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.019. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
3
Attitudes Towards and Experience of the Use of Triage Tags in Major Incidents: A Mixed Method Study.重大事件中对使用分诊标签的态度与体验:一项混合方法研究
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Aug;31(4):376-85. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000480. Epub 2016 May 23.
4
Disaster metrics: quantification of acute medical disasters in trauma-related multiple casualty events through modeling of the Acute Medical Severity Index.灾难指标:通过急性医疗严重指数模型对创伤相关多人伤亡事件中的急性医疗灾难进行量化。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012 Apr;27(2):130-5. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X12000428. Epub 2012 May 17.
5
The Use of Field Triage in Disaster and Mass Casualty Incidents: A Survey of Current Practices by EMS Personnel.灾难和大规模伤亡事件中的现场分诊应用:急救医疗服务人员当前实践的调查
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Jul-Aug;22(4):520-526. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1419323. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
6
[Triage: (medico-) legal implications].分诊:(医学)法律影响
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(5):413-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.020. Epub 2010 Jun 20.
7
[Triage protocols for mass casualty incidents : An overview 30 years after START].[大规模伤亡事件的分诊方案:START 实施 30 年后的概述]
Unfallchirurg. 2016 Aug;119(8):620-31. doi: 10.1007/s00113-014-2717-x.
8
[Disaster triage--needs for a Norwegian standard].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010 Nov 4;130(21):2112-3. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.10.0883.
9
Documentation and tagging of casualties in multiple casualty incidents.多人伤亡事件中伤亡人员的记录与标记
Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003 Oct-Dec;15(5-6):475-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00505.x.
10
Patient distribution in a mass casualty event of an airplane crash.在空难大规模伤亡事件中的患者分布情况。
Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1574-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.04.027. Epub 2013 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Utstein-style template for uniform data reporting of acute medical response in disasters.用于灾难中急性医疗响应统一数据报告的Utstein式模板。
PLoS Curr. 2012 Mar 23;4:e4f6cf3e8df15a. doi: 10.1371/4f6cf3e8df15a.
2
The Cape Triage Score: a new triage system South Africa. Proposal from the Cape Triage Group.开普分诊评分:南非的一种新分诊系统。开普分诊小组的提议。
Emerg Med J. 2006 Feb;23(2):149-53. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.028332.