Pratt F D, Haynes B E
Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Sep;15(9):1084-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80133-0.
Most authorities recommend admission of all near-drowning victims out of fear of "secondary drowning." Identifying victims at risk could promote vigorous evaluation and reduce unnecessary hospitalization. We prospectively studied 52 swimmers with symptoms of respiratory distress after submersion. Thirty-one (60%) were released on the beach, and none of 26 followed up by telephone sought medical care or exhibited symptoms of respiratory distress as many as five days later. Twenty-one patients (40%) were transported to a hospital for further evaluation. All who required admission displayed signs of respiratory distress within four hours. No patient developed "secondary drowning" after an asymptomatic interval, indicating that emergency department observation for four to six hours could effectively screen for those patients requiring inpatient therapy. We question the existence of "secondary drowning" as anything other than established, detectable respiratory insufficiency.
大多数权威机构出于对“继发性溺水”的担忧,建议收治所有溺水者。识别有风险的受害者有助于进行积极评估并减少不必要的住院治疗。我们对52名溺水后出现呼吸窘迫症状的游泳者进行了前瞻性研究。31名(60%)在海滩上被放行,在随后通过电话随访的26名中,没有人寻求医疗护理,也没有人像五天后那样出现呼吸窘迫症状。21名患者(40%)被送往医院作进一步评估。所有需要住院的患者在四小时内均表现出呼吸窘迫迹象。没有患者在无症状期后出现“继发性溺水”,这表明在急诊科观察四至六小时可有效筛查出需要住院治疗的患者。我们质疑“继发性溺水”是否真的存在,还是只是已确诊、可检测到的呼吸功能不全。