J.M. Lyness is president and chief executive officer, American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, Deerfield, Illinois.
G.T. McMahon is president and chief executive officer, Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois.
Acad Med. 2023 Oct 1;98(10):1104-1106. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005314. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
Across the medical profession there is broad acceptance of the critical role of continuing medical education (CME) in enabling physicians to adapt to both new information and evolving expectations within the profession. In the presence of widespread participation in CME, some have attempted to question, discredit, or marginalize the role of ongoing lifelong assessment of physician knowledge and skills through specialty continuing certification, advocating instead for a participatory standard based only on engagement with CME. This essay outlines the limitations of physician self-evaluation and clarifies the need for external assessments. Certification boards' role is to set specialty-specific standards for competence, assess to those standards, and assure the public that certified physicians are adequately maintaining their skills and abilities; doing so credibly necessarily requires, in part, independent assessments of physician competence. In these contexts, the specialty boards are taking approaches to identify performance gaps and leverage intrinsic motivation to facilitate physician engagement in targeted learning. Specialty board continuing certification plays a unique role, distinct from and complementary to the CME enterprise. Calls to eliminate continuing certification requirements beyond self-directed CME are contradictory to the evidence and fail the profession and the public.
在整个医学界,人们普遍承认继续医学教育 (CME) 在使医生能够适应专业内的新信息和不断变化的期望方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在广泛参与 CME 的情况下,有人试图质疑、诋毁或边缘化通过专业继续认证对医生知识和技能进行持续终身评估的作用,而主张仅基于参与 CME 的参与性标准。本文概述了医生自我评价的局限性,并阐明了对外评估的必要性。认证委员会的作用是为胜任力制定特定专业的标准,按照这些标准进行评估,并向公众保证认证医生能够充分保持他们的技能和能力;要做到这一点,在一定程度上,必然需要对医生的胜任力进行独立评估。在这些情况下,专业委员会正在采取措施来识别绩效差距,并利用内在动机来促进医生有针对性地学习。专业委员会的继续认证发挥着独特的作用,与 CME 企业既不同又互补。取消除自我指导的 CME 之外的继续认证要求的呼吁与证据相悖,也有悖于专业和公众的利益。