Northern Ireland Medical and Dental Training Agency (NIMDTA), Belfast.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2023 Nov;7(11):972-981. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.06.022. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
This study reports the effect of systemic prophylactic antibiotics (and their route) on the risk of endophthalmitis after open globe injury (OGI).
Endophthalmitis is a major complication of OGI; it can lead to rapid sight loss in the affected eye. The administration of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis is common practice in some health care systems, although there is no consensus on their use.
PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase were searched. This was completed July 6, 2021 and updated December 10, 2022. We included randomized and nonrandomized prospective studies which reported the rate of post-OGI endophthalmitis when systemic preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (via the oral or IV route) was given. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and ROBINS-I tool were used for assessing the risk of bias. Where meta-analysis was performed, results were reported as an odds ratio. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021271271.
Three studies were included. One prospective observational study compared outcomes of patients who had received systemic or no systemic preoperative antibiotics. The endophthalmitis rates reported were 3.75% and 4.91% in the systemic and no systemic preoperative antibiotics groups, a nonsignificant difference (P = 0.68). Two randomized controlled trials were included (1555 patients). The rates of endophthalmitis were 17 events in 751 patients (2.26%) and 17 events in 804 patients (2.11%) in the oral antibiotics and IV (± oral) antibiotics groups, respectively. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant differences between groups (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-2.12).
The incidences of endophthalmitis after OGI were low with and without systemic antibiotic prophylaxis, although high-risk cases were excluded in the included studies. When antibiotic prophylaxis is considered, there is moderate evidence that oral antibiotic administration is noninferior to IV.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
本研究报告了全身预防性抗生素(及其途径)对开放性眼球损伤(OGI)后眼内炎风险的影响。
眼内炎是 OGI 的主要并发症;它可导致受影响眼睛的视力迅速丧失。在一些医疗保健系统中,全身抗生素预防给药是常见的做法,尽管其使用尚未达成共识。
检索了 PubMed、CENTRAL、Web of Science、CINAHL 和 Embase。这是在 2021 年 7 月 6 日完成的,并于 2022 年 12 月 10 日更新。我们纳入了报告全身术前抗生素预防(口服或静脉途径)给药时 OGI 后眼内炎发生率的随机和非随机前瞻性研究。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具和 ROBINS-I 工具评估偏倚风险。如果进行了荟萃分析,则报告结果为优势比。PROSPERO 注册:CRD42021271271。
纳入了三项研究。一项前瞻性观察性研究比较了接受全身或无全身术前抗生素治疗的患者的结局。全身和无全身术前抗生素组报告的眼内炎发生率分别为 3.75%和 4.91%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.68)。纳入了两项随机对照试验(1555 例患者)。口服抗生素组和静脉(±口服)抗生素组的眼内炎发生率分别为 751 例患者中的 17 例(2.26%)和 804 例患者中的 17 例(2.11%)。荟萃分析表明两组之间无显著差异(优势比,1.07;95%置信区间,0.54-2.12)。
OGI 后使用和不使用全身抗生素预防的眼内炎发生率较低,但纳入的研究排除了高危病例。当考虑抗生素预防时,有中等质量证据表明口服抗生素给药与静脉给药不劣效。
作者没有任何与本文讨论的材料有关的专有或商业利益。