• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

编辑精选——随机筛选接受血管内股腘动脉腔内治疗的患者中使用药物涂层或药物洗脱装置的随机对照试验(RANDOM-STOP 研究)。

Editor's Choice - RANDOMisation Screening for Drug coated or Drug Eluting Device Randomised Trials Among Patients Undergoing Endovascular FemorOPopliteal Procedures (RANDOM-STOP study).

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital of Munich, Germany.

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Sep;66(3):362-368. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.06.038. Epub 2023 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.06.038
PMID:37406876
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to assess the proportion of patients undergoing endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal arterial disease (FP) who would be eligible to take part in seven major randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy of some of the currently available paclitaxel based (PTX) devices used in this clinical context. Various RCTs have shown a potential clinical benefit from the use of paclitaxel in FP endovascular therapy. Nonetheless, patients enrolled were highly selected and the generalisability of these findings in pragmatic cohorts is unclear.

METHODS

Between 1 January and 31 December 2021, all consecutive patients who underwent endovascular procedures for symptomatic FP disease in 16 European centres were retrospectively screened and included in this analysis. The primary outcome measure was individual patient eligibility for inclusion into at least one of the seven RCTs. The reasons for exclusion (clinical and or radiological) as well as in hospital death and morbidity were also reported.

RESULTS

A total of 1 567 consecutive patients (959 male, 61%), corresponding to 1 567 lower limbs, were included. Most patients (1 009 patients, 64.39%) were treated for chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). A total 1 280 patients (81.68%) were not eligible for inclusion in any of the evaluated RCTs. Of them, 741 (47.28%) were excluded for clinical and 1 125 (71.79%) for radiological reasons.

CONCLUSION

The analysed RCTs assessing the efficacy or effectiveness of PTX based endovascular therapies do not seem representative of the patient population with FP disease receiving endovascular therapy in routine clinical practice.

摘要

目的

评估接受股腘动脉疾病(FP)腔内治疗的患者中有多少比例符合参加 7 项主要随机对照试验(RCT)的条件,这些试验研究了目前在这种临床情况下使用的一些紫杉醇类(PTX)装置的疗效。多项 RCT 表明紫杉醇在 FP 腔内治疗中的应用具有潜在的临床益处。然而,入组患者是高度选择的,这些发现在实用队列中的普遍性尚不清楚。

方法

2021 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日,回顾性筛选了 16 个欧洲中心连续接受腔内治疗症状性 FP 疾病的所有患者,并将其纳入本分析。主要观察指标是每位患者符合至少一项 7 项 RCT 入组条件的情况。还报告了排除标准(临床和/或影像学)以及住院期间的死亡和发病率。

结果

共纳入 1567 例连续患者(959 例男性,61%),共 1567 条下肢。大多数患者(1009 例,64.39%)为慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)治疗。1280 例患者(81.68%)不符合任何评估 RCT 的入组标准。其中,741 例(47.28%)因临床原因被排除,1125 例(71.79%)因影像学原因被排除。

结论

评估基于 PTX 的腔内治疗疗效或有效性的分析 RCT 似乎不能代表在常规临床实践中接受腔内治疗的 FP 疾病患者人群。

相似文献

1
Editor's Choice - RANDOMisation Screening for Drug coated or Drug Eluting Device Randomised Trials Among Patients Undergoing Endovascular FemorOPopliteal Procedures (RANDOM-STOP study).编辑精选——随机筛选接受血管内股腘动脉腔内治疗的患者中使用药物涂层或药物洗脱装置的随机对照试验(RANDOM-STOP 研究)。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Sep;66(3):362-368. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.06.038. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
2
A polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting stent (Eluvia) versus a polymer-free, paclitaxel-coated stent (Zilver PTX) for endovascular femoropopliteal intervention (IMPERIAL): a randomised, non-inferiority trial.聚合物涂层紫杉醇洗脱支架(Eluvia)与无聚合物紫杉醇涂层支架(Zilver PTX)治疗下肢股腘动脉腔内介入治疗(IMPERIAL):一项随机非劣效试验。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1541-1551. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32262-1. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
3
Editor's Choice - Long Term Survival after Femoropopliteal Artery Revascularisation with Paclitaxel Coated Devices: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Analysis.编辑精选 - 紫杉醇涂层器械治疗股腘动脉血运重建后的长期生存:倾向评分匹配队列分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Apr;59(4):587-596. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.12.034. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Cost-effectiveness of a paclitaxel-eluting stent (Eluvia) compared to Zilver PTX for endovascular femoropopliteal intervention.紫杉醇洗脱支架(Eluvia)与 Zilver PTX 用于血管内股腘动脉介入治疗的成本效益比较。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):880-887. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2088965.
6
A vein bypass first versus a best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy for patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia who required an infra-popliteal, with or without an additional more proximal infra-inguinal revascularisation procedure to restore limb perfusion (BASIL-2): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial.对于需要进行 below-the-knee(小腿)、伴或不伴额外更近端 below-inguinal(腹股沟下)血运重建以恢复肢体灌注的慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者,静脉旁路优先与最佳血管内治疗优先再血管化策略的比较(BASIL-2):一项开放标签、随机、多中心、3 期试验。
Lancet. 2023 May 27;401(10390):1798-1809. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00462-2. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
7
Comparison of Long Term Outcomes After Endovascular Treatment Versus Bypass Surgery in Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia Patients with Long Femoropopliteal Lesions.比较长段股腘动脉病变的慢性肢体缺血威胁患者腔内治疗与旁路移植手术的长期疗效。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;61(2):258-269. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
8
Outcome after revascularization with paclitaxel-coated devices in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.紫杉醇涂层器械血运重建治疗慢性肢体缺血性疾病患者的转归。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jun;77(6):1742-1750. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.01.195. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
9
Paclitaxel-coated peripheral arterial devices are associated with improved overall survival and limb salvage in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.紫杉醇涂层外周动脉设备与慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者的总体生存率和肢体挽救率的提高相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Nov;74(5):1682-1688.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.035. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
10
Stenting for peripheral artery disease of the lower extremities: an evidence-based analysis.下肢外周动脉疾病的支架置入术:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(18):1-88. Epub 2010 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Bypass Conduit and Early Technical Failure on Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.旁路血管及早期技术失败对慢性肢体威胁性缺血血管重建的影响
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Mar;18(3):e014716. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014716. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
2
Plain versus drug balloon and stenting in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL-3): open label, three arm, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial.普通球囊与药物球囊及支架置入治疗下肢严重缺血(BASIL-3):开放标签、三臂、随机、多中心3期试验
BMJ. 2025 Feb 24;388:e080881. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080881.
3
Drug-eluting devices for lower limb peripheral arterial disease.
药物洗脱装置治疗下肢外周动脉疾病。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Sep 16;20(18):e1136-e1153. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01080.
4
Designing a platform/adaptive randomised controlled trial for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) - The PAEDIS international platform trial development project.为外周动脉疾病(PAD)设计一个平台/适应性随机对照试验——PAEDIS国际平台试验开发项目。
NIHR Open Res. 2024 Apr 29;4:24. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13556.1. eCollection 2024.