Suppr超能文献

右心机械瓣膜假体植入治疗先天性心脏病的结果。

Outcomes after implantation of right-sided mechanical valve prostheses in congenital heart disease.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Heart. 2023 Nov 10;109(23):1765-1771. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-322666.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bioprosthetic valves are often used for pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) and tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) because of concerns about mechanical valve thrombosis in the right heart. The purpose of this study was to assess prosthetic valve function and outcomes (prosthetic valve dysfunction, reoperations and major bleeding events) after mechanical PVR and TVR and to compare these to bioprostheses implanted in the same positions.

METHOD

Case-control study of adults with congenital heart disease that underwent mechanical TVR or PVR (2003-2021) at Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota. For each mechanical prosthesis, we identified two patients that received bioprosthesis in the same position (1:2 matching).

RESULTS

We identified 48 consecutive patients that underwent mechanical PVR (n=39, age 32 (26-38) years, men 22 (56%)) and/or mechanical TVR (n=17, age 36 (31-42) years, men 9 (53%)), as control group of 78 patients (age 30 (24-36) years, men 44 (56%)) and 34 patients (age 34 (29-39) years, men 18 (53%)) that underwent bioprosthetic PVR and TVR, respectively. The most common diagnoses in patients that received mechanical prosthesis were: tetralogy of Fallot (n=14, 19%), aortic stenosis status post Ross operation (n=11, 23%), truncus arteriosus (n=5, 11%), atrioventricular canal defect (n=4, 8%), Ebstein anomaly (n=3, 6%), double outlet right ventricle (n=2, 4%), valvular pulmonic stenosis (n=2, 4%). Compared with the bioprosthesis group, the mechanical prosthesis group had lower temporal increase in Doppler systolic mean gradient after PVR (∆ -1±2 vs 3±2 mm Hg, p<0.001) and Doppler diastolic mean gradient after TVR (∆ 0±1 vs 2±1 mm Hg, p=0.005). The mechanical prosthesis group also had lower risk of prosthetic valve dysfunction after PVR (1.0% vs 2.8% /year, p=0.02) and after TVR (2.6% vs 4.3% /year, p=0.008), but higher risk of major bleeding events (2.2% vs 0.1% /year, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients that received right-sided mechanical valve prostheses had lower temporal increase in valve gradient, lower risk of prosthetic valve dysfunction, but higher risk of bleeding complications compared with those that underwent right-sided bioprosthetic valve implantation.

摘要

背景

由于担心右心机械瓣膜血栓形成,生物假体瓣膜常用于肺动脉瓣置换术(PVR)和三尖瓣置换术(TVR)。本研究旨在评估右心机械 PVR 和 TVR 后人工瓣膜功能和结局(瓣膜功能障碍、再次手术和主要出血事件),并将其与同一部位植入的生物假体进行比较。

方法

明尼苏达州罗切斯特市梅奥诊所对接受机械 TVR 或 PVR(2003-2021 年)的成人进行病例对照研究。对于每例机械假体,我们在同一位置识别出 2 例接受生物假体的患者(1:2 匹配)。

结果

我们确定了 48 例连续接受机械 PVR(n=39,年龄 32(26-38)岁,男性 22 例(56%))和/或机械 TVR(n=17,年龄 36(31-42)岁,男性 9 例(53%))的患者,作为 78 例(年龄 30(24-36)岁,男性 44 例(56%))和 34 例(年龄 34(29-39)岁,男性 18 例(53%))接受生物假体 PVR 和 TVR 的对照组。接受机械假体的患者最常见的诊断为:法洛四联症(n=14,19%)、Ross 手术后主动脉瓣狭窄(n=11,23%)、动脉干(n=5,11%)、房室管缺损(n=4,8%)、Ebstein 异常(n=3,6%)、右心室双出口(n=2,4%)、瓣环下肺动脉狭窄(n=2,4%)。与生物假体组相比,机械假体组 PVR 后多普勒收缩期平均梯度的时间增加较低(-1±2 对 3±2mmHg,p<0.001),TVR 后多普勒舒张期平均梯度的时间增加较低(0±1 对 2±1mmHg,p=0.005)。机械假体组 PVR 后(1.0%对 2.8%/年,p=0.02)和 TVR 后(2.6%对 4.3%/年,p=0.008)人工瓣膜功能障碍的风险也较低,但主要出血事件的风险较高(2.2%对 0.1%/年,p<0.001)。

结论

与接受右心机械瓣膜假体的患者相比,接受右心机械瓣膜假体的患者瓣膜梯度的时间增加较低,人工瓣膜功能障碍的风险较低,但出血并发症的风险较高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验