Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Nov;112(11):1620-1638. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02240-1. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
COVID-19 is associated with a prothrombotic state. Current guidelines recommend prophylactic anticoagulation upon hospitalization.
COVID-PREVENT, an open-label, multicenter, randomized, clinical trial enrolled patients (≥ 18 years) with moderate to severe COVID-19 and age-adjusted D-dimers > 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN). The participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily or thromboprophylaxis with a heparin (SOC) for at least 7 days followed by prophylactic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 28 days or no thromboprophylaxis. The primary efficacy outcome was the D-dimer level and the co-primary efficacy outcome the 7-category ordinal COVID-19 scale by WHO at 7 days post randomization. The secondary outcome was time to the composite event of either venous or arterial thromboembolism, new myocardial infarction, non-hemorrhagic stroke, all-cause death or progression to intubation and invasive ventilation up to 35 days post randomization.
The primary efficacy outcome D-dimer at 7 days was not different between patients assigned to therapeutic (n = 55) or prophylactic anticoagulation (n = 56) (1.21 mg/L [0.79, 1.86] vs 1.27 mg/L [0.79, 2.04], p = 0.78). In the whole study population D-dimer was significantly lower at 7 days compared to baseline (1.05 mg/L [0.75, 1.48] vs 1.57 mg/L [1.13, 2.19], p < 0.0001). Therapy with rivaroxaban compared to SOC was not associated an improvement on the WHO 7-category ordinal scale at 7 days (p = 0.085). Rivaroxaban improved the clinical outcome measured by the score in patients with a higher baseline D-dimer > 2.0 ULN (exploratory analysis; 0.632 [0.516, 0.748], p = 0.026). The secondary endpoint occurred in 6 patients (10.9%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 12 (21.4%) in the SOC group (time-to-first occurrence of the components of the secondary outcome: HR 0.5; 95% CI 0.15-1.67; p = 0.264). There was no difference in fatal or non-fatal major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding between the groups.
Therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban compared to prophylactic anticoagulation with a heparin did not improve surrogates of clinical outcome in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. Whether initial rivaroxaban at therapeutic doses might be superior to thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19 and a high risk as defined by D-dimer > 2 ULN needs confirmation in further studies.
COVID-19 与血栓前状态相关。目前的指南建议在住院时进行预防性抗凝治疗。
COVID-PREVENT 是一项开放标签、多中心、随机、临床试验,纳入了中度至重度 COVID-19 且年龄校正 D-二聚体> 1.5 正常值上限 (ULN) 的患者(≥ 18 岁)。参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受利伐沙班 20mg 每日一次的治疗性抗凝治疗或肝素(SOC)至少 7 天的血栓预防治疗,然后每日一次接受利伐沙班 10mg 预防性抗凝治疗 28 天或不进行血栓预防治疗。主要疗效终点是 7 天随机分组后 D-二聚体水平,共同主要疗效终点是世卫组织的 7 分类 ordinal COVID-19 量表。次要终点是复合终点(静脉或动脉血栓栓塞、新发心肌梗死、非出血性中风、全因死亡或进展为插管和有创通气)的时间,截至随机分组后 35 天。
7 天时接受治疗性抗凝(n=55)或预防性抗凝(n=56)的患者 D-二聚体无差异(1.21mg/L [0.79, 1.86] vs 1.27mg/L [0.79, 2.04],p=0.78)。在整个研究人群中,7 天时 D-二聚体较基线显著降低(1.05mg/L [0.75, 1.48] vs 1.57mg/L [1.13, 2.19],p<0.0001)。与 SOC 相比,利伐沙班治疗并未改善 7 天时的世卫组织 7 分类 ordinal 量表(p=0.085)。在基线 D-二聚体> 2.0ULN 的患者中,利伐沙班改善了以评分衡量的临床结局(探索性分析;0.632 [0.516, 0.748],p=0.026)。在利伐沙班组中,6 名患者(10.9%)和 SOC 组中 12 名患者(21.4%)发生了次要终点事件(首次发生次要终点组成部分的时间:HR 0.5;95%CI 0.15-1.67;p=0.264)。两组间无差异致命或非致命性大出血或临床上相关的非大出血。
与肝素的预防性抗凝相比,利伐沙班的治疗性抗凝并未改善中度至重度 COVID-19 患者的临床结局替代指标。在 D-二聚体> 2ULN 定义的高风险 COVID-19 患者中,初始利伐沙班治疗剂量是否优于血栓预防,需要进一步研究证实。