Suppr超能文献

新型冠状病毒肺炎后预防凝血病的Xa因子抑制剂与低分子量肝素对比:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Factor Xa inhibitors versus low-molecular-weight heparin for preventing coagulopathy following COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Amin Laraib, Qayyum Komal, Uzair Muhammad, Khan Fatima, Sethi Parkha, Hanif Laiba, Azhar Aima, Mazhar Saad, Ejaz Umer, Jawad Sayed

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Northwest General Hospital And Research Centre, Peshawar.

Department of Medicine, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 May 8;86(7):4075-4082. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002079. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have shown a significant occurrence of thromboembolism and a heightened risk of death. It remains unclear whether factor Xa inhibitors are superior to enoxaparin in this context. Hence, there is a need for a direct comparison to assess the preventive effects and safety of factor Xa inhibitors versus enoxaparin in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or retrospective studies that compared the effectiveness or safety of factor Xa inhibitors and enoxaparin in preventing thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Embolic incidence, incidence of bleeding, and all-cause mortality were among the outcomes of interest. Mantel-Haenszel weighted random-effects model was used to calculate relative risks (RRs) with 95 percent CIs.

RESULTS

The analysis included six RCTs and two retrospective studies containing 4048 patients. Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant reduction among patients on factor Xa inhibitors compared with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in the embolic incidence [risk ratio (RR) 0.64 (95%, CI 0.42, 0.98); =0.04, I=12%]. Upon subgroup analysis by type of study design, no significant reductions were noted in patients on factor Xa inhibitors in RCTs (RR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.33-1.17; =0.14) or observational studies (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.23-1.26; =0.15) when compared with enoxaparin Factor Xa inhibitors were not significantly associated with incidence of bleeding [RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.36, 1.61); =0.47, I=0%] or all-cause mortality (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.48-1.36; =0.43). Consistent results were obtained upon subgroup analysis by the type of study design.

CONCLUSION

Factor Xa inhibitors are more effective than enoxaparin in preventing thromboembolism among patients with COVID-19 who are not acutely ill and are hospitalized. Additional rigorous RCTs comparing factor Xa inhibitors with enoxaparin are warranted.

摘要

背景

新冠肺炎住院患者血栓栓塞发生率显著升高,死亡风险也增加。在此背景下,Xa因子抑制剂是否优于依诺肝素尚不清楚。因此,需要进行直接比较,以评估Xa因子抑制剂与依诺肝素对新冠肺炎住院患者的预防效果和安全性。

方法

检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane Central数据库,查找比较Xa因子抑制剂和依诺肝素预防新冠肺炎住院患者血栓栓塞有效性或安全性的随机对照试验(RCT)或回顾性研究。栓塞发生率、出血发生率和全因死亡率是感兴趣的结局指标。采用Mantel-Haenszel加权随机效应模型计算相对风险(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

分析纳入6项RCT和2项回顾性研究,共4048例患者。荟萃分析显示,与低分子肝素(LMWH)相比,使用Xa因子抑制剂的患者栓塞发生率有统计学意义的降低[风险比(RR)0.64(95%CI 0.42,0.98);P=0.04,I²=12%]。按研究设计类型进行亚组分析时,与依诺肝素相比,RCT(RR:0.62;95%CI:0.33-1.17;P=0.14)或观察性研究(RR:0.53;95%CI:0.23-1.26;P=0.15)中使用Xa因子抑制剂的患者未观察到显著降低。Xa因子抑制剂与出血发生率[RR 0.76(95%CI 0.36,1.61);P=0.47,I²=0%]或全因死亡率(RR:0.81;95%CI:0.48-1.36;P=0.43)无显著相关性。按研究设计类型进行亚组分析得到了一致的结果。

结论

对于非急危重症的新冠肺炎住院患者,Xa因子抑制剂在预防血栓栓塞方面比依诺肝素更有效。有必要开展更多比较Xa因子抑制剂与依诺肝素的严格RCT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e24/11230789/3a71af406f30/ms9-86-4075-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验