Suppr超能文献

在诺贝尔生理学或医学奖设立一百周年之际,1923 年:尼古拉·C·帕雷尔斯库——在科学创造力和政治狂热之间。

On the occasion of the centennial of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 1923: Nicolae C. Paulescu-between scientific creativity and political fanatism.

机构信息

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.

Fundació DIABEM, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Acta Diabetol. 2023 Nov;60(11):1513-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02136-6. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

Abstract

AIMS

Since the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded in 1923 to FG Banting and JJR Macleod, many voices have been raised against this decision. The bitterest protest was that of the Romanian scientist Nicolae C. Paulescu. In 2002, The Romanian Academy of Sciences, the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) planned to hold a series of academic events the following year in Paris to acknowledge Paulescu's scientific merits in the discovery of the antidiabetic hormone. However, the initiative was cancelled in August 2003, when the European Center of the Simon Wiesenthal Foundation (SWC) accused Paulescu of being antisemitic. The authors of this manuscript have decided to approach "the Paulescu case" from its double aspect, scientific and sociopolitical, to analyze the circumstances surrounding the discovery of the antidiabetic hormone, and Paulescu's alleged antisemitic past in the historical context of the Romanian nation in the interwar period.

METHODS

We contacted the SWC and people related to the 2003 events in Paris. We performed a comparative review of the documents published by the Toronto group and by Paulescu and analyzed the correspondence and articles generated by international experts from the scientific community interested in the controversy. We carried out an exhaustive bibliographic search through several online catalogs (INDEXCAT, NLM Gateway, EUREKA, MEDHIST). We travelled to Bucharest, where we visited Paulescu's house-museum, interviewed a former student of the Romanian professor, and a prominent medical historian who was knowledgeable about Paulescu's scientific and political biography. Dan Angelescu†, son of Dr. Constantin Angelescu (1904-1990), Paulescu's nephew and collaborator, provided us with a copy of all the available documentation from Paulescu's personal archive. It constitutes an essential source for understanding Paulescu's personal, political and academic biography. Archives consulted: Românǎ Academy (Bucharest). Personal Archive of Paulescu, House -Museum (Bucharest)*. Romanian Jewish Heritage (Bucharest). http://romanianjewish.org/ **. Simon Wiesenthal Center (Los Angeles, CA) http://www.wiesenthal.com . Romanian Patent Office. Oficiul de Stat pentru Invenții şi Mǎrci (OSIM) (Bucharest)*. Nobel Archives (Stockholm) https://www.nobelprize.org . Internet Archive (San Francisco, CA) https://archive.org **. Wellcome Library (London) https://wellcomelibrary.org **. The European Library https://www.theeuropeanlibrary.org/ **. US National Library of Medicine, NLM historical collections http://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/index.html **. US. Holocaust Memorial Museum http://www.ushmm.org/ (*: archive consulted on site; **: material found in the online catalog of the archive; ***: archivists sent us digitized copies of archival material). Books consulted for information on the history of Romania and antisemitism: "Nationalist ideology and antisemitism. The case of Romanian intellectuals in the 1930s", by Leon Volovici; "The mystique of ultranationalism: History of the Iron Guard, Romania, 1919-1941" by Francisco Vega; "Romania 1866-1947", by Keith Hitchins; "History of Romania. Compendium", by Ioan-Aurel Pop and Joan Bolovan; "The Holocaust in Romania. The destruction of Jews and Gypsies under the Antonescu regime, 1940-1944", by Radu Ioanid; "The Jews of East Central Europe between the World Wars", by Ezra Mendelson; "Cultural Politics in Greater Romania. Regionalism, Nation Building and Ethnic Struggle, 1918-1930", by Irina Livezeanu, and "Judeophobia. How and when it is born, where and why it survives", by Gustavo Daniel Perednik. Articles are referenced in the bibliography section at the end of the manuscript.

RESULTS

A-Nicolae Paulescu developed an intense long-term research activity, which included complete pancreatectomy and preparation of a pancreatic extract (PE) containing the antidiabetic hormone he called pancreina. Parenteral administration of the PE achieved excellent results in the treatment of experimental diabetes in dogs and induction of hypoglycemia in the healthy animal. This work was initiated before 1916 and published at least eight months antedating the publication of the first article by Banting and Best (February 1922), who were acquainted with Paulescu's results, but misinterpreted them. The pancreatic extract of the two Canadian researchers, -iletin/insulin-, only achieved similar results to that of the Romanian scientist once they abandoned the use of the "degenerated pancreas" extract (ligation of the ductal system), replacing it with the pancreas of adult or fetal bovine. Pancreina and insulin were very similar. The award of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to FG Banting and JJR Macleod in October 1923 honored the successful clinical use of insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus. Paulescu's achievements were ignored. B-Nicolae Paulescu publicly manifested his Judeophobic ideology on multiple occasions in academic and political interventions and in publications and participated with other figures from the Romanian intellectual sphere in the founding of the Uniunea Național Crestinǎ (UNC, National Christian Union) in 1922 and of the Liga Apǎrǎrii Național Cresține (LANC, League for Christian National Defense) in 1923, antisemitic far-right political parties, associated with an irrational Christian orthodoxy and hatred of Jews. Paulescu played a pivotal role in the spread of antisemitism.

CONCLUSIONS

A-The Romanian scientist NC Paulescu started an intense research program aimed at the isolation of the antidiabetic hormone before 1916, including an original procedure of pancreatectomy in the dog and the elaboration of a pancreatic extract that achieved excellent results in the treatment of experimental diabetes, demonstrating its beneficial effects on the metabolism of carbohydrates, proteins and fats and reducing both glycosuria and glycemia and the urinary excretion of ketone bodies of depancreatized dogs toward normality. The results of these investigations were published in 1920 and 1921, predating the first report published by FG ​​Banting and CH Best in February 1922. It has been sufficiently demonstrated that Canadian researchers were aware of Paulescu's excellent results, mentioning them only in passing, albeit erroneously misrepresenting key results of the Romanian scientist's publication in the aforementioned seminal Canadian article. Expert historians and international scientists have recognized that the pancreatic extract that Paulescu called pancreina and that obtained by Banting and Best, insulin, were very similar. The October 1923 award of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to FG Banting and JJR Macleod ignored Paulescu's scientific achievements in the treatment of experimental diabetes and rewarded the extraordinary advance of insulin treatment in human diabetes. B-At the end of August 2003, a few days before the date of the celebration at the Hôtel Dieu in Paris of the scheduled program of tribute to the scientific merits of NC Paulescu and his important contribution to the discovery of the antidiabetic hormone, convened by the Romanian Academy and the International Diabetes Federation, the Wiesenthal Foundation publicly accused the Romanian scientist of being an antisemite, an act that determined the cancellation of the announced events. The exhaustive investigation of the personal convictions and antisemitic behavior of Nicolae C. Paulescu has undoubtedly documented the Judeophobic ideology of the Romanian scientist, linked to his orthodox religious radicalism, manifested in multiple documents (mostly pamphlets) and interventions in collaboration with other relevant personalities of the Romanian intelligentsia of his time. Furthermore, Paulescu participated in the creation of political organizations of the most radical extreme right that played a fundamental role in the spread of antisemitism amongst the Romanian population and the university community.

摘要

目的

自 1923 年 FG 班廷和 JJR 麦克劳德获得诺贝尔生理学或医学奖以来,许多人对这一决定提出了质疑。最激烈的抗议来自罗马尼亚科学家尼古拉·C·保罗斯库。2002 年,罗马尼亚科学院、欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)和国际糖尿病联合会(IDF)计划于次年在巴黎举办一系列学术活动,以承认保罗斯库在发现抗糖尿病激素方面的科学功绩。然而,这一倡议于 2003 年 8 月被取消,当时欧洲西蒙·维森塔尔中心(SWC)指责保罗斯库反犹。本文的作者决定从科学和社会政治两个方面来探讨“保罗斯库案”,以分析发现抗糖尿病激素的背景以及保罗斯库在两次世界大战期间罗马尼亚民族的历史背景下所谓的反犹主义过去。

方法

我们联系了 SWC 和 2003 年巴黎事件的相关人员。我们对多伦多小组和保罗斯库发表的文件进行了比较审查,并分析了国际科学界对此争议感兴趣的专家的通信和文章。我们通过多个在线目录(INDEXCAT、NLM Gateway、EUREKA、MEDHIST)进行了全面的文献检索。我们前往布加勒斯特,参观了保罗斯库的故居博物馆,采访了罗马尼亚教授的一位前学生和一位知名医学历史学家,他对保罗斯库的科学和政治传记非常了解。康斯坦丁·安杰尔苏斯博士(1904-1990 年)的侄子和合作者丹·安杰尔苏斯(Dan Angelescu)博士为我们提供了保罗斯库个人档案中所有可用文件的副本。这是理解保罗斯库个人、政治和学术传记的重要来源。查阅的档案:罗马尼亚科学院(布加勒斯特)。保罗斯库个人档案,故居博物馆(布加勒斯特)。罗马尼亚犹太遗产(布加勒斯特)。http://romanianjewish.org/**。西蒙·维森塔尔中心(洛杉矶,CA)http://www.wiesenthal.com*。罗马尼亚专利局。Oficiul de Stat pentru Invenții și Mǎrci(OSIM)(布加勒斯特)。诺贝尔档案馆(斯德哥尔摩)https://www.nobelprize.org。互联网档案馆(旧金山,CA)https://archive.org。威尔康图书馆(伦敦)https://wellcomelibrary.org。欧洲图书馆https://www.theeuropeanlibrary.org/**。美国国家医学图书馆,NLM 历史馆藏http://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/index.html*。美国大屠杀纪念馆http://www.ushmm.org/**(*:现场查阅档案;**:在线目录中找到的档案材料;***:档案管理员向我们发送了档案材料的数字副本)。在罗马尼亚历史和反犹主义方面的信息的书籍:“民族主义意识形态和反犹主义。20 世纪 30 年代罗马尼亚知识分子的案例”,作者 Leon Volovici;“铁卫团的神秘主义:1919-1941 年罗马尼亚的极权主义历史”,作者 Francisco Vega;“罗马尼亚 1866-1947”,作者 Keith Hitchins;“历史上的罗马尼亚。概要”,作者 Ioan-Aurel Pop 和 Joan Bolovan;“大屠杀在罗马尼亚。1940-1944 年安托内斯库政权下对犹太人的破坏”,作者 Radu Ioanid;“两次世界大战之间的中东欧犹太人”,作者 Ezra Mendelson;“中罗马尼亚的文化政治。区域主义、民族建设和种族斗争,1918-1930”,作者 Irina Livezeanu,以及“反犹主义。它是如何以及何时诞生的,它在哪里以及为什么它还在继续存在”,作者 Gustavo Daniel Perednik。参考书目部分列出了参考文献。

结果

A-Nicolae Paulescu 开展了一项长期的研究活动,包括对狗进行完整的胰腺切除术和制备一种含有他称为胰腺素的抗糖尿病激素的胰腺提取物(PE)。PE 的肠外给药在治疗实验性糖尿病方面取得了极好的效果,使狗的血糖和尿酮体水平恢复正常。这项工作始于 1916 年之前,并至少在 1922 年 2 月 Banting 和 Best 发表的第一篇文章之前发表了八篇以上的文章,该文章的作者提到了保罗斯库的结果,但错误地解释了这些结果。加拿大研究人员的胰腺提取物,即胰岛素,只有在他们放弃使用“退化胰腺”提取物(结扎导管系统)后,才取得与罗马尼亚科学家类似的结果,取而代之的是成年或胎牛的胰腺。只有当他们放弃使用“退化胰腺”提取物(结扎导管系统),转而使用成年或胎牛的胰腺时,加拿大研究人员的胰腺提取物——胰岛素,才能取得与罗马尼亚科学家类似的结果。帕克里纳和胰岛素非常相似。1923 年 10 月,诺贝尔生理学或医学奖授予 FG 班廷和 JJR 麦克劳德,以表彰他们在糖尿病患者中成功使用胰岛素进行临床治疗。保罗斯库的成就被忽视了。B-Nicolae Paulescu 在学术和政治干预以及出版物中多次公开表现出他的反犹意识形态,并与罗马尼亚知识界的其他人物一起参与了 1922 年成立的全国基督教联盟(UNC)和 1923 年成立的基督教民族防御联盟(LANC),这两个政党都是极右翼的反犹政党,与非理性的基督教正统和对犹太人的仇恨有关。保罗斯库在传播反犹主义方面发挥了关键作用。

结论

A-Nicolae Paulescu 罗马尼亚科学家早在 1916 年之前就开始了一项激烈的研究计划,目的是分离抗糖尿病激素,包括对狗进行原创的胰腺切除术和制备一种胰腺提取物,这种提取物在治疗实验性糖尿病方面取得了极好的效果,证明了它对碳水化合物、蛋白质和脂肪代谢的有益作用,使狗的血糖和尿酮体水平恢复正常。这些研究结果于 1920 年和 1921 年发表,早于 1922 年 2 月 FG Banting 和 CH Best 发表的第一篇报告。已经充分证明,加拿大研究人员了解保罗斯库的优秀成果,只是在报告中只字不提,尽管错误地曲解了罗马尼亚科学家出版物中关键结果。专家历史学家和国际科学界已经认识到,保罗斯库所谓的胰腺素和班廷和贝斯特获得的胰岛素非常相似。1923 年 10 月,诺贝尔生理学或医学奖授予 FG 班廷和 JJR 麦克劳德,忽视了保罗斯库在治疗实验性糖尿病方面的科学成就,奖励了胰岛素在人类糖尿病治疗方面的非凡进展。B-1923 年 8 月底,在预定于巴黎圣热尔维教堂举行的纪念尼古拉·C·保罗斯库的科学功绩和他对发现抗糖尿病激素的重要贡献的活动前夕,维森塔尔基金会公开指责罗马尼亚科学家反犹,这一行为导致了宣布的活动取消。对尼古拉·C·保罗斯库的个人信仰和反犹行为的详尽调查无疑记录了这位罗马尼亚科学家与他的正统宗教激进主义有关的反犹主义意识形态,这种意识形态体现在他的多份文件(主要是小册子)和与他同时代罗马尼亚知识界的其他相关人物合作的干预中。此外,保罗斯库参与了创建最激进的极右翼政治组织的活动,这些组织在罗马尼亚人口和大学社区中发挥了传播反犹主义的重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/affc/10520201/43baccd51350/592_2023_2136_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验