Sundelin Anna, Fagerlund Malin Jonsson, Flam Benjamin, Djärv Therese
Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Resusc Plus. 2023 Jun 24;15:100413. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100413. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Simulating CPR scenarios in a clinical environment has been described as a method for mitigating latent safety threats. Therefore, we implemented regular inter-professional, multidisciplinary in-situ simulations in the emergency department (ED).
To iterate a line-up and action cards for initial CPR management. To examine the experiences among participants regarding attitudes towards simulation and if they perceived any benefits for their patients after the participation.
In 2021 we performed 7 in-situ simulations (15-minute simulation, 15-minute hot debrief) in the ED with the CPR team including doctors and nurses from the ED and anaesthesiology department. A questionnaire was sent to the 48 participants the same day and after 3 and 18 months. Answers were given as yes/no or on a Likert scale 0-5 and are presented as median values with interquartile range (IQR) or frequencies.
A line-up and 9 action cards were created. The response rate of the three questionnaires were 52, 23, and 43%, respectively. In total, 100% would recommend the in-situ simulation to a co-worker. Participants perceived that real patients (5 [3-5]) as well as themselves, (5 [3.5-5]), had benefited from the simulation up to 18 months after.
Thirty-minute in-situ simulations are feasible to implement in the ED and simulation observations were useful for development of standardised role descriptions for resuscitation in the ED. Participants self-report benefit for themselves as well as their patients.
在临床环境中模拟心肺复苏场景已被描述为一种减轻潜在安全威胁的方法。因此,我们在急诊科开展了定期的跨专业、多学科现场模拟。
迭代初始心肺复苏管理的人员安排和操作卡片。调查参与者对模拟的态度以及他们在参与后是否认为对患者有任何益处。
2021年,我们在急诊科进行了7次现场模拟(15分钟模拟,15分钟热反馈),心肺复苏团队包括急诊科和麻醉科的医生和护士。同日以及3个月和18个月后向48名参与者发放问卷。答案为是/否或采用0 - 5李克特量表,以中位数及四分位间距(IQR)或频率呈现。
创建了人员安排和9张操作卡片。三份问卷的回复率分别为52%、23%和43%。总体而言,100%的人会向同事推荐现场模拟。参与者认为,直至18个月后,真实患者(中位数为5[3 - 5])以及他们自己(中位数为5[3.5 - 5])都从模拟中受益。
30分钟的现场模拟在急诊科实施是可行的,模拟观察有助于制定急诊科复苏的标准化角色描述。参与者自我报告称对自己和患者都有益处。