• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外周血管介入治疗的替代入路

Alternative access for peripheral vascular interventions.

作者信息

Alonso Andrea G, Kobzeva-Herzog Anna, Siracuse Jeffrey J

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 May 24;9(3):101232. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101232. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101232
PMID:37408940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10319322/
Abstract

Percutaneous endovascular interventions for advanced lower extremity peripheral arterial disease are becoming increasingly used, often as first-line treatment of chronic limb threatening ischemia. Advancements in endovascular techniques have provided safe and effective alternative revascularization options, especially for high-risk surgical patients. Although the classic transfemoral approach results in high technical success and patency rates, an estimated 20% of lesions remain challenging to access via an antegrade approach. As such, alternative access sites are important in the endovascular armamentarium for the management of chronic limb threatening ischemia. The goal of this review is to discuss alternative access sites, specifically the transradial, transpopliteal, and transpedal approaches, in addition to transbrachial and transaxillary access, and their outcomes in peripheral arterial disease and limb salvage.

摘要

经皮血管腔内介入治疗晚期下肢外周动脉疾病的应用越来越广泛,常作为慢性肢体威胁性缺血的一线治疗方法。血管腔内技术的进步提供了安全有效的替代血管重建选择,特别是对于高风险手术患者。尽管经典的经股动脉入路技术成功率和通畅率较高,但估计仍有20%的病变经顺行入路难以到达。因此,在血管腔内治疗慢性肢体威胁性缺血的器械库中,替代入路部位很重要。本综述的目的是讨论替代入路部位,特别是桡动脉、腘动脉和足背动脉入路,以及肱动脉和腋动脉入路,及其在外周动脉疾病和肢体挽救中的结果。

相似文献

1
Alternative access for peripheral vascular interventions.外周血管介入治疗的替代入路
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 May 24;9(3):101232. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101232. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Outcomes of infrageniculate retrograde versus transfemoral access for endovascular intervention for chronic lower extremity ischemia.膝下逆行与经股动脉入路腔内介入治疗慢性下肢缺血的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):1088-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.028. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
3
Retrograde Transpedal Access for Revascularization of Below-the-Knee Arteries in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia after an Unsuccessful Antegrade Transfemoral Approach.在顺行股动脉入路失败后,采用逆行经足入路对严重肢体缺血患者的膝下动脉进行血管重建。
Rofo. 2016 Oct;188(10):940-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-110101. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
4
Retrograde Revascularization of Tibial Arteries in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia: Plantar-Arch Versus Transpedal Approach.逆行血管重建治疗严重肢体缺血患者的胫骨动脉:足底弓与经皮穿刺入路的比较。
J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Apr;29(2):181-192. doi: 10.1177/15266028211036480. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
5
Retrograde transpopliteal access is safe and effective-it should be added to the vascular surgeon's portfolio.逆行腘动脉入路安全有效,血管外科医生应将其纳入技术储备。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Feb;29(2):260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
6
Retrograde pedal access for patients with critical limb ischemia.逆行足背动脉入路在严重肢体缺血患者中的应用。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug;60(2):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
7
[Percutaneous access for endovascular therapy of PAOD. Femoral, popliteal and pedal].[经皮入路用于下肢动脉硬化闭塞症的血管内治疗。股动脉、腘动脉和足动脉]
Radiologe. 2016 Mar;56(3):223-32. doi: 10.1007/s00117-015-0075-5.
8
Reduced primary patency rate in diabetic patients after percutaneous intervention results from more frequent presentation with limb-threatening ischemia.糖尿病患者经皮介入治疗后原发性通畅率降低是由于肢体威胁性缺血的发生率更高。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.018.
9
Outcomes at a single center after subintimal arterial flossing with antegrade-retrograde intervention for critical limb ischemia.单一中心采用顺行-逆行介入技术行内膜下动脉疏通治疗严重肢体缺血的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 May;67(5):1448-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.091. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
10
Outcome and Distal Access Patency in Subintimal Arterial Flossing with Antegrade-Retrograde Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusions in Lower Extremity Critical Limb Ischemia.下肢慢性肢体缺血性严重缺血患者行顺行-逆行介入治疗内膜下动脉拉丝术的转归和远端入路通畅率。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Apr;31(4):601-606. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.12.006. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgery or Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.慢性肢体威胁性缺血的手术或血管内治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 22;387(25):2305-2316. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2207899. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
2
Radial arterial access is a safe alternative to brachial artery and femoral artery access for endovascular lower extremity peripheral arterial disease.对于血管腔内治疗下肢周围动脉疾病,桡动脉入路是肱动脉和股动脉入路的一种安全替代方法。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Mar;77(3):870-876. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.037. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
3
Percutaneous proximal axillary artery versus femoral artery access for endovascular interventions.经皮近端腋动脉与股动脉入路在血管内介入治疗中的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jul;76(1):165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.031. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
4
Percutaneous radial artery access for peripheral vascular interventions is a safe alternative for upper extremity access.经皮桡动脉入路用于外周血管介入治疗是上肢入路的一种安全替代方法。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jul;76(1):174-179.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.11.076. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
5
Accession Site Does Not Influence the Risk of Stroke after Diagnostic Coronary Angiography or Intervention: Results from a Large Prospective Registry.经导管冠状动脉造影或介入术后,入路部位不影响卒中风险:一项大型前瞻性注册研究结果。
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2021;11(3):122-130. doi: 10.1159/000519539. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
6
Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Contemporary Epidemiology, Management Gaps, and Future Directions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.下肢外周动脉疾病:当代流行病学、管理差距与未来方向:美国心脏协会科学声明。
Circulation. 2021 Aug 31;144(9):e171-e191. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001005. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
7
Retrograde Popliteal Access for Challenging Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusion.逆行腘动脉入路治疗复杂股浅动脉闭塞
Int J Vasc Med. 2021 May 17;2021:8833025. doi: 10.1155/2021/8833025. eCollection 2021.
8
Periprocedural Outcomes of Popliteal vs Upper Extremity Access in the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusive Disease.股浅动脉闭塞性疾病治疗中腘窝部与上肢入路的围手术期结果比较。
J Endovasc Ther. 2021 Aug;28(4):567-574. doi: 10.1177/15266028211012402. Epub 2021 May 10.
9
Outcomes of Peripheral Vascular Interventions via Retrograde Pedal Access for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in a Multicenter Registry.多中心登记处中逆行足踝入路治疗慢性肢体威胁性缺血的外周血管介入治疗结局。
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Apr;27(2):205-210. doi: 10.1177/1526602820908056. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
10
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计-2020 更新:来自美国心脏协会的报告》。
Circulation. 2020 Mar 3;141(9):e139-e596. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757. Epub 2020 Jan 29.