Ghamraoui Ahmed K, Forman Jake, Ricotta John, Ricotta Joseph J
Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, FL.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Mar 4;9(3):101139. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101139. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Manual compression remains the gold standard for achieving hemostasis for percutaneous common femoral artery access. However, it requires prolonged bedrest and 20 to 30 minutes or more of compression for hemostasis. Current arterial closure devices have emerged in recent years, but patients still require prolonged bedrest and time to ambulation and discharge, and these devices are associated with significant access device complications, including hematoma, retroperitoneal bleeding, transfusion requirement, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and arterial thrombosis. A novel femoral access closure device, the CELT ACD (Vasorum Ltd, Dublin, Ireland), has been previously shown to reduce these complication rates and allow rapid hemostasis, require little or no bedrest, and shortened time to ambulation and discharge. This is especially advantageous in the outpatient setting. We report our initial experience with this device.
A prospective single-center single-arm study was performed in an office-based laboratory setting to assess the safety and efficacy of the CELT ACD closure device. Patients underwent diagnostic and therapeutic peripheral arterial procedures from retrograde or antegrade common femoral artery access. Primary endpoints include device deployment success, time to hemostasis, and major or minor complications. Secondary endpoints include time to ambulation and time to discharge. Major complications were defined as bleeding requiring hospitalization or blood transfusion, device embolization, pseudoaneurysm formation, and limb ischemia. Minor complications were defined as bleeding not requiring hospitalization/blood transfusion, device malfunction, and access site infection.
A total of 442 patients were enrolled with common femoral access only. Median age was 78 years (range, 48-91 years), and 64% were male. Heparin was given in all cases, with median heparin dose of 6000 units (range, 3000-10,000 units). Protamine reversal was used in 10 cases due to minor soft tissue bleeding. Average time to hemostasis was 12.1 seconds (±13.2 seconds), time to ambulation was 17.1 minutes (±5.2 minutes), and time to discharge was 31.7 minutes (±8.9 minutes). All devices (100%) were deployed successfully. No major complications occurred (0%). Ten minor complications (2.3%) occurred; all were minor soft tissue bleeding from the access site that resolved with protamine reversal of heparin and manual compression.
The CELT ACD closure device is safe and easily deployed with a very low complication rate, and significantly reduces time to hemostasis, ambulation, and discharge in patients undergoing peripheral arterial intervention from a common femoral artery approach in the office-based laboratory setting. This is a promising device that deserves further evaluation.
手动压迫仍是经皮股总动脉穿刺止血的金标准。然而,它需要长时间卧床休息,且止血需压迫20至30分钟或更长时间。近年来出现了新型动脉闭合装置,但患者仍需长时间卧床休息以及较长的下床活动和出院时间,并且这些装置会引发显著的穿刺相关并发症,包括血肿、腹膜后出血、输血需求、假性动脉瘤、动静脉瘘和动脉血栓形成。一种新型股动脉穿刺闭合装置CELT ACD(爱尔兰都柏林Vasorum有限公司)此前已被证明可降低这些并发症发生率,并实现快速止血,几乎无需或无需卧床休息,同时缩短下床活动和出院时间。这在门诊环境中尤为有利。我们报告了使用该装置的初步经验。
在一个基于办公室的实验室环境中进行了一项前瞻性单中心单臂研究,以评估CELT ACD闭合装置的安全性和有效性。患者通过逆行或顺行股总动脉穿刺进行诊断性和治疗性外周动脉手术。主要终点包括装置植入成功、止血时间以及主要或次要并发症。次要终点包括下床活动时间和出院时间。主要并发症定义为需要住院或输血的出血、装置栓塞、假性动脉瘤形成和肢体缺血。次要并发症定义为不需要住院/输血的出血、装置故障和穿刺部位感染。
仅通过股总动脉穿刺入路共纳入442例患者。中位年龄为78岁(范围48 - 91岁),64%为男性。所有病例均给予肝素,肝素中位剂量为6000单位(范围3000 - 10,000单位)。因轻微软组织出血,10例患者使用了鱼精蛋白中和肝素。平均止血时间为12.1秒(±13.2秒),下床活动时间为17.1分钟(±5.2分钟),出院时间为31.7分钟(±8.9分钟)。所有装置(100%)均成功植入。未发生主要并发症(0%)。发生了10例次要并发症(2.3%);均为穿刺部位轻微软组织出血,通过鱼精蛋白中和肝素及手动压迫得以解决。
在基于办公室的实验室环境中,对于经股总动脉途径进行外周动脉介入治疗的患者,CELT ACD闭合装置安全且易于植入,并发症发生率极低,显著缩短了止血、下床活动和出院时间。这是一种很有前景的装置,值得进一步评估。