Surgery Department, Institut Curie, St. Cloud, France.
PSL, St. Cloud, U900, INSERM, France.
Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(16):16889-16895. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6315. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
Genomic tests are a useful tool for adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in the case of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer with intermediate prognostic factors. Real-life data on the use of tests can help identify the target population for testing.
French multicentric study (8 centers) including patients, all candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy for HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. We describe the percentage of tests performed outside recommendations, according to the year of testing. We calculated a ratio defined as the number of tests required to avoid chemotherapy for one patient, and according to patient and cancer characteristics. We then performed a cost-saving analysis using medical cost data over a period of 1 year from diagnosis, calculated from a previous study. Finally, we calculated the threshold of the ratio (number of tests required to avoid chemotherapy for one patient) below which the use of genomic tests was cost-saving.
A total of 2331 patients underwent a Prosigna test. The ratio (performed test/avoided chemotherapy) was 2.8 [95% CI: 2.7-2.9] in the whole population. In the group following recommendations for test indication, the ratio was 2.3 [95% CI: 2.2-2.4]. In the case of non-abidance by recommendations, the ratio was 3 [95% CI: 2.8-3.2]. Chemotherapy was avoided in 841 patients (36%) following the results of the Prosigna test. The direct medical costs saved over 1 year of care were 3,878,798€ and 1,718,472€ in the group of patients following test recommendations. We calculated that the ratio (performed test/avoided chemotherapy) needed to be under 6.9 for testing to prove cost-saving.
The use of genomic testing proved cost-saving in this large multicentric real-life analysis, even in certain cases when the test was performed outside recommendations.
对于激素受体阳性(HR+)、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性(HER2-)且具有中等预后因素的乳腺癌患者,基因检测是辅助化疗决策的有用工具。真实世界中有关检测使用的数据可以帮助确定检测的目标人群。
本研究为法国多中心研究(8 个中心),纳入所有 HR+、HER2-早期乳腺癌患者,这些患者均为辅助化疗的候选者。我们根据检测年份描述了不符合推荐意见进行检测的比例。我们计算了一个比值,定义为每避免一个患者接受化疗所需的检测数量,并根据患者和癌症特征进行了计算。然后,我们使用之前研究中的医疗费用数据,对 1 年的诊断后成本进行了节省分析。最后,我们计算了比值(避免一个患者接受化疗所需的检测数量)的阈值,低于该阈值时基因检测具有成本效益。
共对 2331 例患者进行了 Prosigna 检测。整个队列中,(进行的检测/避免的化疗)比值为 2.8 [95%CI:2.7-2.9]。在符合检测适应证推荐的组中,比值为 2.3 [95%CI:2.2-2.4]。不符合推荐的情况下,比值为 3 [95%CI:2.8-3.2]。根据 Prosigna 检测结果,841 例患者(36%)避免了化疗。在遵循检测建议的患者组中,1 年护理期间节省的直接医疗费用为 3878798 欧元和 1718472 欧元。我们计算得出,比值(进行的检测/避免的化疗)需要低于 6.9 才能证明检测具有成本效益。
即使在某些情况下检测不符合推荐意见,本大规模多中心真实世界分析也表明,基因检测的使用具有成本效益。