Suppr超能文献

鼻腔内给予右美托咪定-咪达唑仑、右美托咪定-氯胺酮和咪达唑仑-氯胺酮用于儿科患者术前用药的比较:一项双盲随机试验。

Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine-midazolam, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, and midazolam-ketamine for premedication in paediatric patients: a double-blinded randomized trial.

机构信息

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.

PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2023;55(2):103-108. doi: 10.5114/ait.2023.129276.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Paediatric patients are a population with a high level of anxiety. The prevention of perioperative stress in a frightened child is important to render the child calm and cooperative for smoother induction. Intranasal premedication is easy and safe, and the drug is rapidly absorbed into the systemic circulation, ensuring early onset of sedation in children and good effectiveness.

METHODS

150 patients in the age group 2-4 years, ASA class I, undergoing elective surgical procedures were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: a DM group (receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 and midazolam 0.12 mg kg -1 ), a DK group (receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 and keta-mine 2 mg kg -1 ), and an MK group (receiving intranasal midazolam 0.12 mg kg -1 and ketamine 2 mg kg -1 ). After 30 minutes of administration of the drugs, the patients were assessed for parent separation anxiety, sedation, ease of IV cannulation, and mask acceptance.

RESULTS

The comparison among the 3 groups showed a statistically significant difference for ease of IV cannulation and mask acceptance at 30 minutes, with a P -value of 0.010 with CI of 0.0-0.02, and P -value 0.007 with CI 0.0-0.02, respectively. The parent separation anxiety and sedation score at 30 minutes was statistically insignificant with a P -value of 0.82 with CI of 0.03-0.14 and P -value 0.631 with CI of 0.38-0.58, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of midazolam and ketamine had a better clinical profile for premedication as compared to other combination drugs used in our study in terms of IV cannulation and acceptance of masks with a comparable decrease in separation anxiety from parents and adequate sedation.

摘要

背景

儿科患者是一个焦虑水平较高的群体。预防手术期患儿的应激反应对于使患儿镇静和合作以实现更顺利的诱导非常重要。鼻内给药既简单又安全,药物迅速被吸收到体循环中,可确保儿童镇静作用迅速起效,且效果良好。

方法

将 150 名年龄在 2-4 岁、ASA 分级 I 级、择期手术的患者纳入研究。患者随机分为 3 组:DM 组(接受鼻内给予右美托咪定 1μg/kg 和咪达唑仑 0.12mg/kg)、DK 组(接受鼻内给予右美托咪定 1μg/kg 和氯胺酮 2mg/kg)和 MK 组(接受鼻内给予咪达唑仑 0.12mg/kg 和氯胺酮 2mg/kg)。给药 30 分钟后,评估患儿父母分离焦虑、镇静、静脉穿刺难易程度和面罩接受度。

结果

3 组之间的比较显示,静脉穿刺和面罩接受度在 30 分钟时有统计学显著差异,P 值分别为 0.010(CI 0.0-0.02)和 0.007(CI 0.0-0.02)。30 分钟时父母分离焦虑和镇静评分无统计学差异,P 值分别为 0.82(CI 0.03-0.14)和 0.631(CI 0.38-0.58)。

结论

与我们研究中使用的其他组合药物相比,咪达唑仑和氯胺酮联合使用具有更好的临床预给药特征,在静脉穿刺和面罩接受方面表现更好,与父母分离焦虑的降低程度相当,且镇静作用充分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62aa/10415598/f56ef75a2b71/AIT-55-51037-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验