Zhang Xiao, Fan Ze, He Danyi, Liu Yang, Shi Xiaotong, Zhang Haopeng
State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Engineering Research Center for Dental Materials and Advanced Manufacture, Department of Anesthesiology, School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
PeerJ. 2025 Mar 31;13:e19216. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19216. eCollection 2025.
Pediatric patients undergoing outpatient dental surgery often exhibit instinctive resistance and fear in face of the unknown, which in turn creates obstacles to subsequent treatment. Appropriate sedation can increase compliance, decrease the incidence of adverse events, and lead to improved treatment outcomes. To evaluate the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine as pre-medication in children undergoing tooth extraction with general anesthesia, we searched databases including the Medline, Embase and Cochrane library for eligible trials. Randomized controlled trials of dexmedetomidine for premedication . placebo or midazolam in pediatric patients were included, while trials involving children having dental treatment under local anesthesia were excluded. Two review authors independently participated in the inclusion of trials and assessment of bias. Decisions were made based on group discussion. We finally included seven trials in this review, with a total of 496 pediatric patients. Three of the included trials compared dexmedetomidine with placebo. A meta-analysis indicated that dexmedetomidine was effective for preoperative sedation and for preventing emergence delirium; two of these studies reported no incidences of bradycardia and hypoxemia during study observation period. Four trials compared dexmedetomidine with midazolam, meta-analysis of these four trials gave risk ratios (RR) for successful parental separation, satisfactory mask acceptance and emergence delirium rate of 1.26 (95% CI [0.86-1.84]); 1.07(95% CI [0.94-1.22]); -0.18(95% CI [-0.29 to -0.07]), respectively. Only one study reported complications arising from administration of premedication. Based on the current evidence, we can conclude that the dexmedetomidine appears to be an effective premedication, offering the advantage of reducing the incidence of postoperative delirium compared to midazolam. However, high-quality clinical trials with larger sample sizes are needed to determine the selection of different medication modes and doses, as well as to study perioperative adverse reactions.
接受门诊牙科手术的儿科患者面对未知情况时常常表现出本能的抗拒和恐惧,这进而给后续治疗造成障碍。适当的镇静可以提高依从性,降低不良事件的发生率,并带来更好的治疗效果。为了评估右美托咪定作为全身麻醉下儿童拔牙术前用药的有效性,我们检索了包括Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆在内的数据库以查找符合条件的试验。纳入了右美托咪定用于儿科患者术前用药、安慰剂或咪达唑仑的随机对照试验,而排除了涉及在局部麻醉下进行牙科治疗的儿童的试验。两名综述作者独立参与试验的纳入和偏倚评估。通过小组讨论做出决策。我们最终在本综述中纳入了7项试验,共有496名儿科患者。其中3项纳入试验将右美托咪定与安慰剂进行了比较。一项荟萃分析表明,右美托咪定在术前镇静和预防苏醒期谵妄方面有效;其中两项研究报告在研究观察期内未发生心动过缓和低氧血症。4项试验将右美托咪定与咪达唑仑进行了比较,对这4项试验的荟萃分析得出成功父母分离、面罩接受满意和苏醒期谵妄率的风险比(RR)分别为1.26(95%CI[0.86 - 1.84]);1.07(95%CI[0.94 - 1.22]); - 0.18(95%CI[-0.29至 - 0.07])。只有一项研究报告了术前用药引起并发症。基于目前的证据,我们可以得出结论,右美托咪定似乎是一种有效的术前用药,与咪达唑仑相比具有降低术后谵妄发生率的优势。然而,需要进行更大样本量的高质量临床试验来确定不同用药模式和剂量的选择,以及研究围手术期不良反应。