• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术模式:美国整形外科医师协会(ASPS)成员调查,2000年与2020年——提眉手术有多大变化?

Practice Patterns: An American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) Member Survey, 2000 and 2020-How Much Has Brow Lifting Changed?

作者信息

Coombs Demetrius M, Sinclair Nicholas R, Kochuba Andrew, Grow Jacob, Couto Rafael A, Matarasso Alan, Zins James E

出版信息

Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Dec 14;44(1):1-8. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad207.

DOI:10.1093/asj/sjad207
PMID:37409963
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2001, Elkwood and Matarasso published an American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) member survey detailing brow lift practice patterns. Interval changes in practice patterns have not been studied.

OBJECTIVES

The previous survey was revised to elucidate current trends in brow lift surgery.

METHODS

A 34-question descriptive survey was distributed to a random group of 2360 ASPS members. Results were compared to the 2001 survey.

RESULTS

A total of 257 responses were collected (11% response rate; ± 6% margin of error at 95% CI). The most frequent technique for the correction of brow ptosis in both surveys was the endoscopic approach. The use of hardware fixation has increased in endoscopic brow lifting, whereas the use of cortical tunnels has decreased. Although coronal brow lifting has decreased in frequency, hairline and isolated temporal lift have increased. Neuromodulators have replaced resurfacing techniques as the most common nonsurgical adjunct. Frequent use of neuromodulators has risen from 11.2% to 88.5%. Nearly 30% of current surgeons feel that neuromodulators have replaced formal brow lifting procedures to a significant degree.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparing the 2001 and current ASPS member survey there has been a clear transition to less invasive procedures over time. Although the endoscopic approach was the most popular means of forehead correction in both surveys, coronal brow lifting has decreased in frequency and the hairline and temporal approaches have increased. Neurotoxins have replaced laser resurfacing and chemical peeling methods as an adjunct, and in some cases replaced the invasive procedure entirely. Possible explanations for these findings will be discussed.

摘要

背景

2001年,埃尔克伍德和马塔拉索发表了一项美国整形外科医师协会(ASPS)成员调查,详细介绍了提眉手术的实践模式。尚未对实践模式的间隔变化进行研究。

目的

对之前的调查进行修订,以阐明提眉手术的当前趋势。

方法

向2360名随机抽取的ASPS成员发放了一份包含34个问题的描述性调查问卷。将结果与2001年的调查进行比较。

结果

共收集到257份回复(回复率为11%;95%置信区间的误差幅度为±6%)。在两项调查中,矫正眉下垂最常用的技术都是内镜入路。在内镜提眉术中,硬件固定的使用有所增加,而皮质隧道的使用有所减少。尽管冠状提眉术的频率有所下降,但发际线提升术和孤立颞部提升术有所增加。神经调节剂已取代皮肤磨削技术,成为最常用的非手术辅助手段。神经调节剂的频繁使用率已从11.2%升至88.5%。近30%的现任外科医生认为神经调节剂在很大程度上已取代了正规的提眉手术。

结论

比较2001年和当前的ASPS成员调查结果可知,随着时间的推移,手术方式已明显向侵入性较小的方向转变。尽管内镜入路在两项调查中都是最受欢迎的额部矫正方法,但冠状提眉术的频率有所下降,发际线提升术和颞部入路有所增加。神经毒素已取代激光皮肤磨削术和化学剥脱术成为辅助手段,在某些情况下甚至完全取代了侵入性手术。将对这些发现的可能解释进行讨论。

相似文献

1
Practice Patterns: An American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) Member Survey, 2000 and 2020-How Much Has Brow Lifting Changed?手术模式:美国整形外科医师协会(ASPS)成员调查,2000年与2020年——提眉手术有多大变化?
Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Dec 14;44(1):1-8. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad207.
2
The Hairline Brow Lift.发际线提升术。
Clin Plast Surg. 2022 Jul;49(3):349-356. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 May 13.
3
An Algorithm for Correction of the Aging Upper Face.一种矫正衰老上面部的算法。
Clin Plast Surg. 2022 Jul;49(3):415-420. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2022.03.005.
4
Subcutaneous Lateral Temporal Lift.皮下颞侧提升术。
Clin Plast Surg. 2022 Jul;49(3):365-375. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 May 13.
5
Endoscopic brow lift: a retrospective review of 628 consecutive cases over 5 years.内镜下眉提升术:对连续628例患者5年的回顾性研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Aug;112(2):628-33; discussion 634-5. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000071042.11435.2E.
6
Finesse in forehead and brow rejuvenation: modern concepts, including endoscopic methods.额头和眉部年轻化的技巧:现代概念,包括内窥镜方法。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Dec;134(6):1141-1150. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000756.
7
Secondary endoscopic forehead lift in patients with previous coronal brow lifts.既往接受过冠状眉提升术患者的二期内镜前额提升术
Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Mar;54(3):251-5.
8
Experience with cortical tunnel fixation in endoscopic brow lift: the "bevel and slide" modification.内窥镜额部提升中皮质隧道固定的经验:“斜切和滑动”改良。
Int J Surg. 2009 Dec;7(6):510-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.08.013. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
9
National plastic surgery survey: brow lifting techniques and complications.全国整形外科学调查:提眉技术与并发症
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Dec;108(7):2143-50; discussion 2151-2. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200112000-00056.
10
The varied options in brow lifting.提眉术的各种选择。
Clin Plast Surg. 2013 Jan;40(1):101-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Customized Endoscopic Male Forehead/Eyebrow Lift.定制内镜男性前额/眉部提升术。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05126-x.
2
Factors Affecting the Choice of Cosmetic Forehead and/or Eyebrow Lift Technique: An Oculofacial Plastic Surgeon's Perspective.影响美容性额部和/或眉提升技术选择的因素:眼面部整形医生的视角
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04726-x.
3
Long-term Stability in Endoscopic Brow Lift: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.内镜下眉提升术的长期稳定性:文献的系统评价和荟萃分析
Aesthet Surg J. 2025 Feb 18;45(3):232-240. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae225.
4
A Gaze into the Eyebrow Standards of Asian Versus Caucasian Women.亚洲女性与白种女性眉毛标准之审视
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Dec;48(23):4725-4734. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04240-6. Epub 2024 Jul 16.