• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

司美格鲁肽对比替格列肽用于 2 型糖尿病患者:奥地利、荷兰、立陶宛和阿拉伯联合酋长国的血糖控制成本。

Semaglutide versus tirzepatide for people with type 2 diabetes: cost of glycemic control in Austria, the Netherlands, Lithuania, and the United Arab Emirates.

机构信息

Department of Economics, EY Denmark, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Middle East & Africa, Novo Nordisk Region South East Europe, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Aug;39(8):1055-1060. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2231275. Epub 2023 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1080/03007995.2023.2231275
PMID:37415503
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist semaglutide and the dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide tirzepatide have proven to significantly reduce glucose levels in people with type 2 diabetes. However, the costs needed to achieve a sustained decrease in HbA1c level and disease control with semaglutide and tirzepatide, respectively, are unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the cost of treatment with semaglutide with the cost of treatment with tirzepatide for type 2 diabetes in Austria, the Netherlands, Lithuania, and the United Arab Emirates in order to determine their respective value for money.

METHODS

The primary outcome of this analysis was the cost in euros needed to achieve disease control in one person with type 2 diabetes based on the composite endpoint of HbA1c <7%, ≥5% weight loss, and no hypoglycemic events. In addition, analyses regarding the cost needed to reach relevant HbA1c endpoints were performed. Clinical data were obtained from the SURPASS 2 trial, registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03987919), and drug cost was based on wholesale acquisition cost or pharmacy purchase prices from public domains obtained in Q1 of 2023.

RESULTS

The cost needed to achieve disease control in one person with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c <7%, ≥5% weight loss, and no hypoglycemic events) was up to three times lower using semaglutide compared with all three doses of tirzepatide in most markets. In the HbA1c analyses, semaglutide was also found to be the least expensive treatment option.

CONCLUSION

Semaglutide provides better value for money than tirzepatide for HbA1c-lowering endpoints.

摘要

目的

胰高血糖素样肽-1 激动剂司美格鲁肽和双重葡萄糖依赖性胰岛素促分泌肽替西帕肽已被证明可显著降低 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖水平。然而,尚不清楚分别使用司美格鲁肽和替西帕肽实现持续降低 HbA1c 水平和控制疾病所需的成本。因此,本研究旨在比较奥地利、荷兰、立陶宛和阿拉伯联合酋长国使用司美格鲁肽治疗的成本与使用替西帕肽治疗 2 型糖尿病的成本,以确定它们各自的性价比。

方法

本分析的主要结局是根据 HbA1c<7%、≥5%体重减轻和无低血糖事件的复合终点,实现一名 2 型糖尿病患者疾病控制所需的欧元成本。此外,还进行了关于达到相关 HbA1c 终点所需成本的分析。临床数据来自 SURPASS 2 试验,在 clinicaltrials.gov 注册(NCT03987919),药物成本基于 2023 年第一季度从公共领域获得的批发采购成本或药店采购价格。

结果

在大多数市场中,与替西帕肽的所有三种剂量相比,使用司美格鲁肽实现一名 2 型糖尿病患者(HbA1c<7%、≥5%体重减轻和无低血糖事件)疾病控制所需的成本最多可降低三倍。在 HbA1c 分析中,司美格鲁肽也是最具成本效益的治疗选择。

结论

对于降低 HbA1c 的终点,司美格鲁肽比替西帕肽具有更高的性价比。

相似文献

1
Semaglutide versus tirzepatide for people with type 2 diabetes: cost of glycemic control in Austria, the Netherlands, Lithuania, and the United Arab Emirates.司美格鲁肽对比替格列肽用于 2 型糖尿病患者:奥地利、荷兰、立陶宛和阿拉伯联合酋长国的血糖控制成本。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Aug;39(8):1055-1060. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2231275. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Cost per Patient Achieving Treatment Targets and Number Needed to Treat with Tirzepatide Versus Semaglutide 1 mg in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the United States.在美国2型糖尿病患者中,与司美格鲁肽1毫克相比,替尔泊肽实现治疗目标的每位患者成本及需治疗人数。
Diabetes Ther. 2023 Dec;14(12):2045-2055. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01470-w. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
Tirzepatide versus semaglutide for weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A value for money analysis.替尔泊肽与司美格鲁肽治疗2型糖尿病患者减肥效果的成本效益分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Apr;25(4):961-964. doi: 10.1111/dom.14940. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
4
Short-term cost-effectiveness analysis of tirzepatide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in the United States.在美国,替尔泊肽治疗 2 型糖尿病的短期成本效益分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Mar;29(3):276-284. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.3.276.
5
Effects of subcutaneous tirzepatide versus placebo or semaglutide on pancreatic islet function and insulin sensitivity in adults with type 2 diabetes: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-arm, phase 1 clinical trial.皮下注射替西帕肽与安慰剂或司美格鲁肽对 2 型糖尿病成人胰岛功能和胰岛素敏感性的影响:一项多中心、随机、双盲、平行臂、1 期临床试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022 Jun;10(6):418-429. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00085-7. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
6
Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide Once Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.替尔泊肽与司美格鲁肽每周一次治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效比较。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 5;385(6):503-515. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107519. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
7
Achievement of glycaemic targets with weight loss and without hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes with the once-weekly glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide: A post hoc analysis of the SURPASS-1 to -5 studies.在2型糖尿病患者中,使用每周一次的葡萄糖依赖性促胰岛素多肽和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂替尔泊肽实现血糖目标且无低血糖发生,同时伴有体重减轻:SURPASS-1至-5研究的事后分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Apr;25(4):965-974. doi: 10.1111/dom.14943. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
8
Long-term cost-effectiveness analysis of tirzepatide versus semaglutide 1.0 mg for the management of type 2 diabetes in the United States.替尔泊肽与司美格鲁肽1.0毫克在美国治疗2型糖尿病的长期成本效益分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 May;25(5):1292-1300. doi: 10.1111/dom.14979. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
9
Evaluation of the Cost Per Patient Achieving Treatment Targets with Oral Semaglutide: A Short-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the United States.评估口服司美格鲁肽治疗达标患者的人均成本:美国短期成本效益分析。
Adv Ther. 2019 Dec;36(12):3483-3493. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01125-y. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
10
Effect of Subcutaneous Tirzepatide vs Placebo Added to Titrated Insulin Glargine on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SURPASS-5 Randomized Clinical Trial.度拉糖肽皮下注射与安慰剂联合滴定的胰岛素甘精胰岛素对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:SURPASS-5 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):534-545. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0078.