• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Incorrectly Labeled Randomized Study and Inappropriate Within-Group Comparisons in: "Effectiveness of Home Gardening in Improving Food Security and Health in Chacraseca, Nicaragua: A Pilot Study".《尼加拉瓜查克拉塞卡家庭园艺对改善粮食安全和健康的有效性：一项试点研究》中错误标注的随机研究及组内不恰当比较
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2023 Feb;34(1):510-512. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2023.0035.
2
Effectiveness of Home Gardening in Improving Food Security and Health in Chacraseca, Nicaragua: A Pilot Study.尼加拉瓜查卡雷斯卡家庭园艺在改善粮食安全和健康方面的有效性：一项试点研究。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(2):842-856. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0067.
3
Effectiveness of Home Gardening in Improving Food Security and Health in Chacraseca, Nicaragua: A Pilot Study.家庭园艺对改善尼加拉瓜查克拉塞卡地区粮食安全与健康状况的成效：一项试点研究
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2023;34(1):842-856. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2023.0037.
4
Factors Correlated with Home Gardening in Gauteng Province, South Africa.南非豪登省与家庭园艺相关的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 8;18(5):2737. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052737.
5
Home gardening improves dietary diversity, a cluster-randomized controlled trial among Tanzanian women.家庭园艺改善饮食多样性，一项针对坦桑尼亚女性的整群随机对照试验。
Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Apr;17(2):e13096. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13096. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
6
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Home Vegetable Gardening Intervention among Older Cancer Survivors Shows Feasibility, Satisfaction, and Promise in Improving Vegetable and Fruit Consumption, Reassurance of Worth, and the Trajectory of Central Adiposity.一项针对老年癌症幸存者的家庭蔬菜园艺干预的初步随机对照试验表明，该干预在改善蔬菜和水果摄入、增强自我价值感以及中心性肥胖轨迹方面具有可行性、满意度和潜力。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Apr;118(4):689-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.11.001. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
7
The Impact of a Household Food Garden Intervention on Food Security in Lesotho.家庭食物花园干预对莱索托粮食安全的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 20;17(22):8625. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228625.
8
Assessing health impacts of home food gardens with Wind River Indian Reservation families: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估温德河印第安人保留区家庭的家庭菜园对健康的影响：一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e022731. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022731.
9
Impact of a community gardening project on vegetable intake, food security and family relationships: a community-based participatory research study.社区园艺项目对蔬菜摄入量、粮食安全和家庭关系的影响：基于社区的参与式研究。
J Community Health. 2012 Aug;37(4):874-81. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9522-z.
10
Piloting Home Produce Delivery to Improve Food Security, Budget, and Diet in Families with Children: A Mixed-Methods Study.试行家庭农产品配送以改善有孩子家庭的食品安全、预算和饮食：一项混合方法研究。
Acad Pediatr. 2025 Jan-Feb;25(1):102550. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2024.07.017. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Home Gardening in Improving Food Security and Health in Chacraseca, Nicaragua: A Pilot Study.尼加拉瓜查卡雷斯卡家庭园艺在改善粮食安全和健康方面的有效性：一项试点研究。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(2):842-856. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0067.
2
Errors in the implementation, analysis, and reporting of randomization within obesity and nutrition research: a guide to their avoidance.肥胖与营养研究中随机化实施、分析和报告中的错误：避免方法指南。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Nov;45(11):2335-2346. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00909-z. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
3
Common scientific and statistical errors in obesity research.肥胖研究中常见的科学和统计错误。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Apr;24(4):781-90. doi: 10.1002/oby.21449.
4
Comparisons against baseline within randomised groups are often used and can be highly misleading.与随机分组内的基线相比，通常会使用这种比较方法，但这种比较方法可能具有高度误导性。
Trials. 2011 Dec 22;12:264. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-264.
5
Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).撤稿：出版伦理委员会（COPE）的指南。
Croat Med J. 2009 Dec;50(6):532-5. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2009.50.532.
6
The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.观察性研究因果效应的设计与分析：与随机试验设计的相似之处。
Stat Med. 2007 Jan 15;26(1):20-36. doi: 10.1002/sim.2739.

Incorrectly Labeled Randomized Study and Inappropriate Within-Group Comparisons in: "Effectiveness of Home Gardening in Improving Food Security and Health in Chacraseca, Nicaragua: A Pilot Study".

作者信息

Tooze Xander A, Vorland Colby J, Siddique Abu Bakkar, Allison David B

机构信息

Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health - Bloomington.

Applied Health Science, Indiana University School of Public Health - Bloomington.

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2023 Feb;34(1):510-512. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2023.0035.

DOI:10.1353/hpu.2023.0035
PMID:37415952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10321776/
Abstract
摘要