Grilly D M, Gowans G C
Behav Neurosci. 1986 Aug;100(4):512-24. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.100.4.512.
The effects of morphine and those of immobilization stress (IMS) on performance of rats in discrete-trial, two-choice discrimination tasks were compared. In Experiments 1 and 2, two shocks of different intensities were discriminative stimuli (SD) for choices in a T-maze. In Experiments 3 and 4, responses were right and left lever presses in an operant chamber, where correct responses were signaled by either shocks of different intensities (shock discrimination task) or by the position of a brief light flash (light discrimination task). In Experiment 1, both 70-min IMS and 5 mg/kg morphine induced greater disruptions in trials in which the higher shock was the SD, and there were no significant differences between treatments. However, in Experiment 2, only the effects of morphine were blocked by 10 mg/kg naltrexone. In Experiment 3, the effects of IMS and morphine were not selective with respect to SD shock level in the shock discrimination task, nor were they task (shock vs. light) selective. Also, the effect of morphine was significantly greater than the effect of IMS in both tasks. The results of Experiment 4 indicated that effects induced by actual alterations in the intensities of the SD shocks did not mimic those induced by either morphine or IMS but that abrupt decreases in the duration of the SD lights induced effects similar to those of morphine. These studies indicate that different mechanisms mediate the effects of IMS and morphine and much of their behavioral effects in shock discrimination tasks are due to dissociative processes rather than alterations in perceived shock intensity.
比较了吗啡和制动应激(IMS)对大鼠在离散试验、二选一辨别任务中表现的影响。在实验1和2中,两种不同强度的电击是T迷宫中选择的辨别刺激(SD)。在实验3和4中,反应是在操作箱中按压左右杠杆,其中正确反应由不同强度的电击(电击辨别任务)或短暂闪光的位置(光辨别任务)发出信号。在实验1中,70分钟的IMS和5毫克/千克吗啡在较高电击为SD的试验中均引起更大的干扰,且各处理之间无显著差异。然而,在实验2中,只有吗啡的作用被10毫克/千克纳曲酮阻断。在实验3中,在电击辨别任务中,IMS和吗啡的作用对SD电击水平没有选择性,对任务(电击与光)也没有选择性。此外,在两项任务中,吗啡的作用均显著大于IMS的作用。实验4的结果表明,SD电击强度的实际变化所诱导的效应与吗啡或IMS所诱导的效应不同,但SD光持续时间的突然缩短所诱导的效应与吗啡的效应相似。这些研究表明,不同的机制介导了IMS和吗啡的作用,并且它们在电击辨别任务中的许多行为效应是由于解离过程而非感知电击强度的改变。