Wheeler P G, Theodossi A, Pickford R, Laws J, Knill-Jones R P, Williams R
Gut. 1979 Mar;20(3):196-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.20.3.196.
This study describes the use of ultrasound in 84 consecutive patients to distinguish between medical (intrahepatic) and surgical (extrahepatic) types of jaundice. Accuracy rates in the 84 patients investigated were compared with those found in 169 patients using the computer-aided diagnostic model for jaundice. In 50 patients in whom both techniques were carried out direct comparison was possible. Ultrasound failed to give adequate visualisation for technical reasons in two patients, but 75 of the remaining 82 (91.5%) were correctly separated into medical and surgical categories. A similar percentage (90%, 152 of 169 patients) were correctly classified by the computer-assisted model, and in the 50 patients assessed by both techniques correct diagnostic separation was achieved in 43 (86%) by ultrasound and in 42 (84%) by computer. However, in this latter group two of the errors with computer diagnosis were falsely positive for a surgical jaundice (extrahepatic obstruction), and a surgical exploration performed on the basis of this test could have been unnecessary. This was not found with ultrasound in these same patients, all the errors being false negative. A high degree of confidence can therefore be attached to the demonstration by ultrasound of a dilated biliary tree.
本研究描述了对84例连续患者使用超声来区分内科性(肝内)黄疸和外科性(肝外)黄疸。将84例受调查患者的准确率与使用黄疸计算机辅助诊断模型的169例患者的准确率进行了比较。在50例同时采用两种技术的患者中,可以进行直接比较。由于技术原因,超声在2例患者中未能提供足够的可视化图像,但其余82例中的75例(91.5%)被正确分为内科性和外科性两类。计算机辅助模型的正确分类率相似(90%,169例患者中的152例),在两种技术都评估的50例患者中,超声正确诊断分类的有43例(86%),计算机正确诊断分类的有42例(84%)。然而,在这后一组中,计算机诊断的两个错误是外科性黄疸(肝外梗阻)的假阳性,基于此检查进行的外科探查可能是不必要的。在这些相同的患者中,超声未发现这种情况,所有错误均为假阴性。因此,超声显示扩张的胆管树具有很高的可信度。