Suppr超能文献

HRT 方案下冻融胚胎移植的临床妊娠率:1 周与 2 周雌激素预处理的随机对照初步研究。

Clinical pregnancy rate for frozen embryo transfer with HRT: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing 1 week versus 2 weeks of oestradiol priming.

机构信息

Reproductive Medicine Service, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.

IVI-RMA Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023 Jul 7;21(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12958-023-01111-8.

Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does a frozen-embryo transfer in an artificially-prepared endometrium (FET-HRT) cycle yield similar clinical pregnancy rate with 7 days of oestrogen priming compared to 14 days?

DESIGN

This is a single-centre, randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study. All FET-HRT cycles were performed in a tertiary centre between October 2018 and January 2021. Overall, 160 patients were randomized, with a 1:1 allocation, into two groups of 80 patients each: group A (7 days of E2 prior to P4 supplementation) and group B (14 days of E2 prior to P4 supplementation). Both groups received single blastocyst stage embryos on the 6th day of vaginal P4 administration. The primary outcome was the feasibility of such strategy assessed as clinical pregnancy rate, secondary outcomes were biochemical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate and serum hormone levels on the day of FET. Chemical pregnancy was assessed by an hCG blood test 12 days after FET and clinical pregnancy was confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound at 7 weeks.

RESULTS

The analysis included 160 patients who were randomly assigned to either group A or group B on the seventh day of their FET-HRT cycle if the measured endometrial thickness was above 6.5 mm. Following screening failures and of drop-outs, 144 patients were finally included both in group A (75 patients) or group B (69 patients). Demographic characteristics for both groups were comparable. The biochemical pregnancy rate was 42.5% and 48.8% for group A and group B, respectively (p 0.526). Regarding the clinical pregnancy rate at 7 weeks, no statistical difference was observed (36.3% vs 46.3% for group A and group B, respectively, p = 0.261). The secondary outcomes of the study (biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rate) were comparable between the two groups for IIT analysis, as well as the P4 values on the day of FET.

CONCLUSIONS

In a frozen embryo transfer cycle, performed with artificial preparation of the endometrium, 7 versus 14 days of oestrogen priming are comparable, in terms of clinical pregnancy rate; the advantages of a seven-day protocol include the shorter time to pregnancy, reduced exposure to oestrogens, and more flexibility of scheduling and programming, and less probability to recruit a follicle and have a spontaneous LH surge. It is important to keep in mind that this study was designed as a pilot trial with a limited study population as such it was underpowered to determine the superiority of an intervention over another; larger-scale RCTs are warranted to confirm our preliminary results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial number: NCT03930706.

摘要

研究问题

在人工准备的子宫内膜(FET-HRT)周期中进行冻融胚胎移植(FET),与使用孕激素 14 天相比,使用孕激素 7 天是否会产生相似的临床妊娠率?

设计

这是一项单中心、随机、对照、开放标签的初步研究。所有的 FET-HRT 周期均于 2018 年 10 月至 2021 年 1 月在一家三级中心进行。总共 160 名患者被随机分为两组,每组 80 名患者:A 组(孕激素 4 天前使用 7 天 E2)和 B 组(孕激素 4 天前使用 14 天 E2)。两组均在阴道孕激素 6 天给予单个囊胚期胚胎。主要结局是作为临床妊娠率评估的这种策略的可行性,次要结局是生化妊娠率、流产率、活产率和 FET 日的血清激素水平。FET 后 12 天通过 hCG 血液检查评估化学妊娠,7 周时通过阴道超声确认临床妊娠。

结果

如果测量的子宫内膜厚度大于 6.5mm,则在 FET-HRT 周期的第 7 天对 160 名患者进行随机分组,进入 A 组或 B 组。经过筛选失败和脱落,最终共有 144 名患者被纳入 A 组(75 名患者)或 B 组(69 名患者)。两组的人口统计学特征相似。A 组和 B 组的生化妊娠率分别为 42.5%和 48.8%(p>0.526)。关于 7 周时的临床妊娠率,A 组和 B 组之间无统计学差异(分别为 36.3%和 46.3%,p=0.261)。对于 ITT 分析,两组的次要结局(生化妊娠、流产和活产率)以及 FET 日的孕激素值相似。

结论

在使用人工准备的子宫内膜的冻融胚胎移植周期中,雌激素 7 天与 14 天的预处理在临床妊娠率方面是可比的;7 天方案的优点包括妊娠时间更短、雌激素暴露减少、日程安排和编程更灵活、招募卵泡和发生自发性 LH 激增的可能性更小。重要的是要记住,这项研究是作为一项初步试验设计的,研究人群有限,因此不足以确定干预措施的优越性;需要更大规模的 RCT 来证实我们的初步结果。

临床试验注册号

NCT03930706。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea0f/10326948/b8dd74a87574/12958_2023_1111_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验