Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Dec;8(4):1011-1020. doi: 10.1177/23969873231186480. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
There is increasing interest in the concept of frailty in stroke, including both physical frailty and imaging-evidence of brain frailty. We aimed to establish the prevalence of brain frailty in stroke survivors as well as the concurrent and predictive validity of various frailty measures against long-term cognitive outcomes.
We included consecutively admitted stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) survivors from participating stroke centres. Baseline CT scans were used to generate an overall brain frailty score for each participant. We measured frailty via the Rockwood frailty index, and a Fried frailty screening tool. Presence of major or minor neurocognitive disorder at 18-months following stroke or TIA was established via a multicomponent assessment. Prevalence of brain frailty was established based upon observed percentages within groups defined by frailty status (robust, pre-frail, frail). We assessed the concurrent validity of brain frailty and frailty scales via Spearman's rank correlation. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses, controlling for age, sex, baseline education and stroke severity, to evaluate association between each frailty measure and 18-month cognitive impairment.
Three-hundred-forty-one stroke survivors participated. Three-quarters of people who were frail had moderate-severe brain frailty and prevalence increased according to frailty status. Brain frailty was weakly correlated with Rockwood frailty (Rho: 0.336; < 0.001) and with Fried frailty (Rho: 0.230; < 0.001). Brain frailty (OR: 1.64, 95% CI = 1.17-2.32), Rockwood frailty (OR: 1.05, 95% CI = 1.02-1.08) and Fried frailty (OR: 1.93, 95% CI = 1.39-2.67) were each independently associated with cognitive impairment at 18 months following stroke.
There appears to be value in the assessment of both physical and brain frailty in patients with ischaemic stroke and TIA. Both are associated with adverse cognitive outcomes and physical frailty remains important when assessing cognitive outcomes.
人们对中风患者的衰弱概念(包括身体衰弱和大脑衰弱的影像学证据)越来越感兴趣。我们旨在确定中风幸存者大脑衰弱的流行率,以及各种衰弱测量方法对长期认知结果的并发和预测有效性。
我们纳入了来自参与中风中心的连续入院中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)幸存者。基线 CT 扫描用于为每位参与者生成整体大脑衰弱评分。我们通过 Rockwood 衰弱指数和 Fried 衰弱筛查工具来衡量衰弱。通过多组分评估确定中风或 TIA 后 18 个月时是否存在主要或次要神经认知障碍。根据虚弱状态(强壮、虚弱前期、虚弱)定义的组内观察百分比确定大脑衰弱的患病率。我们通过 Spearman 等级相关评估了大脑衰弱和衰弱量表的并发有效性。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,控制年龄、性别、基线教育和中风严重程度,以评估每种衰弱测量与 18 个月认知障碍的关联。
341 名中风幸存者参与了研究。四分之三的虚弱患者存在中重度大脑衰弱,患病率随着虚弱状态的增加而增加。大脑衰弱与 Rockwood 衰弱呈弱相关(Rho:0.336;<0.001),与 Fried 衰弱呈弱相关(Rho:0.230;<0.001)。大脑衰弱(OR:1.64,95%CI=1.17-2.32)、Rockwood 衰弱(OR:1.05,95%CI=1.02-1.08)和 Fried 衰弱(OR:1.93,95%CI=1.39-2.67)均与中风后 18 个月时的认知障碍独立相关。
在缺血性中风和 TIA 患者中评估身体和大脑衰弱似乎具有价值。两者都与不良认知结果相关,在评估认知结果时,身体衰弱仍然很重要。