Griffith University, Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia; Griffith University, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia.
Griffith University, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia; Montana State University, College of Education. Health & Human Development, Bozeman, MT 59717-2940, USA.
Gait Posture. 2023 Jul;104:151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.06.018. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
People with mild-to-moderate hip osteoarthritis (OA) exhibit hip muscle weakness, alterations in hip kinematics and kinetics and hip contact forces during gait compared to healthy controls. However, it is unclear if those with hip OA use different motor control strategies to coordinate the motion of the centre of mass (COM) during gait. Such information could provide further critical assessment of conservative management strategies implemented for people with hip OA.
Do muscle contributions to the acceleration of the COM during walking differ between individuals with mild-to-moderate hip OA and controls?
Eleven individuals with mild-to-moderate hip OA and 10 healthy controls walked at a self-selected speed while whole-body motion and ground reaction forces were measured. Muscle forces during gait were obtained using static optimisation and an induced acceleration analysis was performed to determine individual muscle contributions to the acceleration of the COM during single-leg stance (SLS). Between-group comparisons were made using independent t-tests via Statistical Parametric Modelling.
There were no between-group differences in spatial-temporal gait parameters or three-dimensional whole-body COM acceleration. The rectus femoris, biceps femoris, iliopsoas and gastrocnemius muscles in the hip OA group contributed less to the fore-aft accelerations of the COM (p < 0.05), and more to the vertical COM acceleration with the gluteus maximus (p < 0.05), during SLS, compared to the control group.
Subtle differences exist in the way people with mild-to-moderate hip OA use their muscles to accelerate the whole-body centre of mass during the SLS phase of walking relative to healthy controls. These findings improve understanding of the complex functional consequences of hip OA and enhance our understanding of how to monitor the effectiveness of an intervention on biomechanical changes in gait in people with hip OA.
与健康对照组相比,患有轻度至中度髋骨关节炎(OA)的人在行走时表现出臀部肌肉无力、髋关节运动学和动力学改变以及髋关节接触力。然而,目前尚不清楚患有髋 OA 的人是否使用不同的运动控制策略来协调行走时的质心(COM)运动。这些信息可以进一步对针对髋 OA 患者实施的保守治疗策略进行批判性评估。
患有轻度至中度髋 OA 的个体与对照组相比,在行走过程中 COM 的加速度的肌肉贡献是否存在差异?
11 名患有轻度至中度髋 OA 的个体和 10 名健康对照者以自我选择的速度行走,同时测量全身运动和地面反作用力。使用静态优化获得行走过程中的肌肉力,并进行了诱导加速度分析,以确定单腿站立(SLS)期间个体肌肉对 COM 加速度的贡献。通过统计参数建模使用独立 t 检验进行组间比较。
在时空步态参数或三维全身 COM 加速度方面,组间没有差异。与对照组相比,髋 OA 组的股直肌、股二头肌、髂腰肌和腓肠肌在 SLS 期间对 COM 的前后加速度的贡献较小(p<0.05),而对臀大肌的垂直 COM 加速度的贡献较大(p<0.05)。
患有轻度至中度髋 OA 的人在 SLS 阶段使用肌肉加速全身质心的方式与健康对照组存在细微差异。这些发现提高了对髋 OA 复杂功能后果的理解,并增强了我们对如何监测干预对髋 OA 患者步态生物力学变化效果的理解。