Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds LS1 3EX, United Kingdom.
Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds LS1 3EX, United Kingdom.
Injury. 2023 Aug;54(8):110918. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110918. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
The management of paediatric femoral shaft fractures is expensive and is guided by age and fracture characteristics. The primary aim of this study was to perform a cost evaluation for managing paediatric femoral shaft fractures. The secondary aim of this study was to perform and compare costs of the different techniques of managing paediatric femoral shaft fractures.
Ninety-eight femoral shaft fractures in children aged ≤16 were identified between 01/06/2014-30/06/2019. Retrospective data of clinical complications were obtained on infection, malunion and non-union. Data on additional intervention, reoperations for complications and routine removal of metal work were obtained. Costing analysis was performed by a bottom-up calculation, and gathering Patient Level Information and Costing System (PLICS) data.
There were 41 hip spica casting (HSC), 21 flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN), 14 submuscular plating (SMP), 19 rigid intramedullary nailing (RIN) and 3 external fixation (EF). Complications observed were HSC 3(7%); FIN 8(38%); SMP 2(14%); RIN 1(5%); EF 2(67%). The total costs for managing femoral shaft fractures were £8,955pp the costs for the different managements were; HSC £3,442pp; FIN £7,739pp; SMP £6,953pp; RIN £8,925pp; EF £19,116pp. The additional costs incurred for managing complications and routine removal of metal work for the internal fixation methods were: HSC 0.7%, FIN 23.7%, SMP 16.3%, RIN 10.9%, EF 28.1%.
The operative management of paediatric femoral shaft fractures is associated with a high cost burden and this study demonstrates how financial data can be used to influence clinical management strategy. RIN carry a high initial implant cost however when considering the additional costs, such as treating complications it remains comparable to other modes of fixation. Our cost analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference between FIN, SMP and RIN. Due to the clinical complications observed and associated additional costs, we have discontinued the routine use of FIN for femoral shaft fractures at our centre. We recognise other centres may have a different complication and cost profile for each technique, but recommend they evaluate their practice given the potential economic benefit it has on the service provider.
小儿股骨干骨折的治疗费用昂贵,主要取决于年龄和骨折特征。本研究的主要目的是对小儿股骨干骨折的治疗进行成本评估。本研究的次要目的是对不同的小儿股骨干骨折治疗技术进行成本分析和比较。
2014 年 6 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日期间,共发现 98 例年龄≤16 岁的儿童股骨干骨折。对感染、畸形愈合和不愈合等临床并发症的相关数据进行了回顾性分析。对其他干预措施、并发症的再次手术以及金属植入物的常规取出等相关数据进行了分析。成本分析采用自下而上的计算方法,收集患者水平信息和成本系统(PLICS)数据。
41 例髋人字石膏固定(HSC)、21 例弹性髓内钉固定(FIN)、14 例肌下钢板固定(SMP)、19 例刚性髓内钉固定(RIN)和 3 例外固定(EF)。并发症发生率为 HSC 组 3 例(7%);FIN 组 8 例(38%);SMP 组 2 例(14%);RIN 组 1 例(5%);EF 组 2 例(67%)。管理股骨干骨折的总成本为每位患者 8955 英镑,不同治疗方法的成本分别为:HSC 组 3442 英镑;FIN 组 7739 英镑;SMP 组 6953 英镑;RIN 组 8925 英镑;EF 组 19116 英镑。内部固定方法治疗并发症和常规取出金属植入物的额外费用为:HSC 组 0.7%;FIN 组 23.7%;SMP 组 16.3%;RIN 组 10.9%;EF 组 28.1%。
小儿股骨干骨折的手术治疗费用负担沉重,本研究表明如何利用财务数据来影响临床管理策略。RIN 具有较高的初始植入物成本,但考虑到并发症的治疗等额外成本,其与其他固定方法相比仍具有可比性。我们的成本分析并没有显示 FIN、SMP 和 RIN 之间有显著差异。由于观察到的临床并发症和相关的额外成本,我们已经停止在我们中心常规使用 FIN 治疗股骨干骨折。我们认识到,其他中心可能对每种技术的并发症和成本状况有不同的认识,但建议他们根据潜在的经济效益评估他们的治疗方案。