Weerkamp Pien, Chieffo Daniela, Collin Philippe, Moriconi Federica, Papageorgiou Andriani, Vainieri Isabella, Miranda Ruben, Hankinson Catherine, Vogel Asmus, Poncet Sarah, Moss Catherine, Muntoni Francesco, Mercuri Eugenio, Hendriksen Jos
Kempenhaeghe Centre for Neurological Learning Disabilities, Heeze, the Netherlands; Maastricht University, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Department of Paediatric Neurology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2023 Sep;46:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2023.06.007. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
During the last two decades brain related comorbidities of Duchenne have received growing scientific and clinical interest and therefore systematic assessment of cognition, behaviour and learning is important. This study aims to describe the instruments currently being used in five neuromuscular clinics in Europe as well as the diagnoses being made in these clinics.
A Delphi based procedure was developed by which a questionnaire was sent to the psychologist in five of the seven participating clinics of the Brain Involvement In Dystrophinopathy (BIND) study. Instruments and diagnoses being used were inventoried for three domains of functioning (cognition, behaviour and academics) and three age groups (3-5 years, 6-18 years and adulthood 18+ years).
Data show wide diversity of tests being used in the five centres at different age groups and different domains. For the intelligence testing there is consensus in using the Wechsler scales, but all other domains such as memory, attention, behavioural problems and reading are tested in very different ways by different instruments in the participating centres.
The heterogeneity of tests and diagnoses being used in current clinical practice underlines the importance for developing a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to improve both clinical practice and scientific research over different countries and improve comparative work.
在过去二十年中,杜兴氏病的脑部相关合并症受到了越来越多的科学和临床关注,因此系统评估认知、行为和学习情况非常重要。本研究旨在描述欧洲五家神经肌肉诊所目前使用的评估工具以及这些诊所所做出的诊断。
开发了一种基于德尔菲法的程序,向杜兴肌营养不良症脑受累(BIND)研究的七个参与诊所中的五个诊所的心理学家发送问卷。对三个功能领域(认知、行为和学业)以及三个年龄组(3至5岁、6至18岁和18岁以上成年人)所使用的评估工具和诊断进行了清查。
数据显示,五个中心在不同年龄组和不同领域使用的测试方法差异很大。在智力测试方面,使用韦氏智力量表已达成共识,但在参与中心,记忆、注意力、行为问题和阅读等所有其他领域都通过不同的工具以非常不同的方式进行测试。
当前临床实践中使用的测试和诊断方法的异质性凸显了制定标准操作程序(SOP)的重要性,以改善不同国家的临床实践和科学研究,并改进比较工作。