Mercer University School of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, 1250 E 66th Street, Savannah, GA, 31404, USA.
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Mental Health, 624 N Broadway, Hampton House, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Health Place. 2023 Sep;83:103079. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103079. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
Despite widespread evidence that neighborhood conditions impact health, few studies apply theory to clarify the physical and social factors in communities that drive health outcomes. Latent class analysis (LCA) addresses such gaps by identifying distinct neighborhood typologies and the joint influence that neighborhood-level factors play in health promotion. In the current study, we conducted a theory-driven investigation to describe Maryland neighborhood typologies and examined differences in area-level self-rated poor mental and physical health across typologies. We conducted an LCA of Maryland census tracts (n = 1384) using 21 indicators of physical and social characteristics. We estimated differences in tract-level self-rated physical and mental health across neighborhood typologies using global Wald tests and pairwise comparisons. Five neighborhood classes emerged: Suburban Resourced (n = 410, 29.6%), Rural Resourced (n = 313, 22.6%), Urban Underserved (n = 283, 20.4%), Urban Transient (n = 226, 16.3%), Rural Health Shortage (n = 152, 11.0%). Prevalence of self-rated poor physical and mental health varied significantly (p < 0.0001) by neighborhood typology, with the Suburban Resourced neighborhood class demonstrating the lowest prevalence of poor health and the Urban Underserved neighborhoods demonstrating the poorest health. Our results highlight the complexity of defining "healthy" neighborhoods and areas of focus to mitigate community-level health disparities to achieve health equity.
尽管有广泛的证据表明邻里环境会影响健康,但很少有研究应用理论来阐明社区中推动健康结果的物理和社会因素。潜在类别分析 (LCA) 通过识别不同的邻里类型和邻里层面因素对健康促进的共同影响来解决这些差距。在当前的研究中,我们进行了一项基于理论的调查,以描述马里兰州的邻里类型,并研究了不同类型邻里的区域自我评估的心理健康和身体健康差异。我们使用 21 个物理和社会特征指标对马里兰州的普查区进行了 LCA(n=1384)。我们使用全球 Wald 检验和两两比较来估计邻里类型之间的邻里水平自我评估的身体和心理健康差异。出现了五种邻里类型:郊区资源充足型(n=410,29.6%)、农村资源充足型(n=313,22.6%)、城市服务不足型(n=283,20.4%)、城市流动人口型(n=226,16.3%)、农村健康短缺型(n=152,11.0%)。自我评估的身体和心理健康不良的患病率因邻里类型而显著不同(p<0.0001),郊区资源充足型邻里的健康不良患病率最低,城市服务不足型邻里的健康状况最差。我们的研究结果强调了定义“健康”邻里的复杂性以及需要关注的重点领域,以减轻社区层面的健康差距,实现健康公平。