University of California Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, 650 Charles E Young Dr S, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Los Angeles County EMS Agency, 10100 Pioneer Blvd, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670, USA; Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine & The Lundquist Institute, 1000 W Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90502, USA.
Resuscitation. 2023 Sep;190:109902. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109902. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
This study evaluated the association between patient race/ethnicity and the odds of AED provision by a lay rescuer in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the United States.
This was a cross-sectional retrospective study of OHCA patients in the National Emergency Medical Services Information System database from the year 2021. Patients were excluded for age < 18 years, EMS-witnessed arrest, traumatic arrest, arrest in a healthcare setting, do-not-resuscitate order, and arrest in a wilderness location. The primary outcome was the association between race/ethnicity and the odds of lay-rescuer AED placement for OHCA. Multiple logistic regression adjusting for known covariates was performed and odds ratios were reported.
A total of 207,134 patients were included. Patients with lay rescuer AED use had statistically significant differences with regard to arrest location and arrest witnessed status, and had longer EMS response times (8.5 minutes vs 7 minutes). The odds of AED use was lowest for American Indian/Alaskan Native persons (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.54, 0.72) followed by Asian (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.60, 0.72), Hispanic (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.63, 0.69) and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander patients (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.57, 0.83) when compared to White patients. Black patients had the highest odds of AED use (OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.07, 1.12).
When compared to White persons, the odds of lay rescuer AED use in OHCA was between 31-38% lower for American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian, Hispanic, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander persons, and 10% higher for Black persons.
本研究评估了美国院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者种族/民族与旁观者除颤器使用几率之间的关系。
这是一项在 2021 年国家紧急医疗服务信息系统数据库中进行的 OHCA 患者的横断面回顾性研究。排除年龄<18 岁、有急救人员见证的骤停、创伤性骤停、在医疗机构发生的骤停、不复苏医嘱和在荒野地区发生的骤停的患者。主要结局是种族/民族与旁观者放置除颤器治疗 OHCA 的几率之间的关系。进行了调整已知协变量的多变量逻辑回归,并报告了比值比。
共纳入 207134 例患者。有旁观者使用除颤器的患者在发病地点和发病是否有急救人员见证方面存在统计学差异,并且 EMS 反应时间更长(8.5 分钟比 7 分钟)。美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民使用除颤器的几率最低(OR 0.62;95%CI 0.54,0.72),其次是亚洲人(OR 0.66;95%CI 0.60,0.72)、西班牙裔(OR 0.66;95%CI 0.63,0.69)和夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民(OR 0.69;95%CI 0.57,0.83),与白人患者相比。黑人患者使用除颤器的几率最高(OR 1.10;95%CI 1.07,1.12)。
与白人患者相比,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民、亚洲人、西班牙裔和夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民发生 OHCA 时,旁观者使用除颤器的几率低 31-38%,而黑人患者的几率高 10%。