Clinical Impact of Oral Step-Down Therapy for Gram-Negative Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND

In recent years, there has been a growing body of evidence that supports oral step-down therapy for the treatment of gram-negative bacteremia. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes for hospitalized patients who received intravenous-only (IV-only) therapy versus oral step-down therapy with low, moderate, and highly bioavailable antimicrobials for the treatment of gram-negative bacteremia.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center, observational study, we examined data from adult patients hospitalized with gram-negative bacteremia in a 1-year period. Data analysis was performed using information collected from electronic medical records and a clinical surveillance system.

RESULTS

A total of 199 patients were included in this study. Patients in the IV-only group had higher Charlson comorbidity index scores at baseline and higher rates of intensive care unit admission while bacteremic ( = .0096 and .0026, respectively). The primary outcome of 30-day all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the oral step-down group ( < .0001). Secondary outcomes of 30-day bacteremia recurrence, line-associated complications, and hospital length of stay were similar between groups. The total duration of antibiotic therapy was one day longer for oral step-down patients ( = .0015) and the estimated cost of antibiotic therapy was significantly lower in this group ( < .00001).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, oral step-down therapy was not associated with increased 30- day all-cause mortality. Oral step-down therapy was also more cost-effective than IV-only therapy, while both groups had similar bacteremia recurrence within 30 days.