Gherri Elena, Fiorino Fabiola Rosaria, Iani Cristina, Rubichi Sandro
Dipartimento di Filosofia e Comunicazione, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Science, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jun 22;17:1209555. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1209555. eCollection 2023.
The time needed to find a visual target amongst distractors (search task) can increase as a function of the distractors' number (set-size) in the search-array (inefficient search). While the allocation of attention in search tasks has been extensively investigated and debated in the visual domain, little is known about these mechanisms in touch. Initial behavioral evidence shows inefficient search behavior when participants have to distinguish between target and distractors defined by their vibro-tactile frequencies. In the present study, to investigate the allocation of attention to items of the search-array we measured the N140cc during a tactile task in which the set-size was manipulated. The N140cc is a lateralized component of event-related brain potentials recently described as a psychophysiological marker of attentional allocation in tactile search tasks. Participants localized the target, a singleton frequency, while ignoring one, three or five homogeneous distractors. Results showed that error rates linearly increased as a function of set-size, while response times were not affected. Reliable N140cc components were observed for all set-sizes. Crucially, the N140cc amplitude decreased as the number of distractors increased. We argue that the presence of additional distractors hindered the preattentive analysis of the search array resulting in increased uncertainty about the target location (inefficient preattentive stage). This, in turn, increased the variability of the deployment of attention to the target, resulting in reduced N140cc amplitudes. Consistent with existing behavioral evidence, these findings highlight systematic differences between the visual and the tactile attentional systems.
在干扰项中找到视觉目标所需的时间(搜索任务)可能会随着搜索阵列中干扰项数量(集合大小)的增加而增加(低效搜索)。虽然在视觉领域中,搜索任务中的注意力分配已经得到了广泛研究和讨论,但对于触觉领域的这些机制却知之甚少。初步行为证据表明,当参与者必须区分由振动触觉频率定义的目标和干扰项时,会出现低效搜索行为。在本研究中,为了探究对搜索阵列中项目的注意力分配,我们在一个操纵了集合大小的触觉任务中测量了N140cc。N140cc是事件相关脑电位的一个侧化成分,最近被描述为触觉搜索任务中注意力分配的心理生理标志物。参与者定位目标(一个单独的频率),同时忽略一个、三个或五个同质干扰项。结果表明,错误率随着集合大小的增加呈线性增加,而反应时间不受影响。在所有集合大小下都观察到了可靠的N140cc成分。至关重要的是,随着干扰项数量的增加,N140cc的振幅降低。我们认为,额外干扰项的存在阻碍了对搜索阵列的前注意分析,导致目标位置的不确定性增加(低效的前注意阶段)。这反过来又增加了对目标注意力部署的变异性,导致N140cc振幅降低。与现有的行为证据一致,这些发现突出了视觉和触觉注意力系统之间的系统性差异。