• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2015 - 2020年肺癌切除术的手术标记

Surgical markup in lung cancer resection, 2015-2020.

作者信息

Robinson Eric, Trivedi Parth, Neifert Sean, Eromosele Omeko, Liu Benjamin Y, Housman Brian, Ilonen Ilkka, Taioli Emanuela, Flores Raja

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY.

Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

JTCVS Open. 2023 May 9;14:538-545. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.04.020. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2023.04.020
PMID:37425438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10329030/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess procedure markup (charge-to-cost ratio) across lung resection procedures and examine variability by geographic region.

METHODS

Provider-level data for common lung resection operations was obtained from the 2015 to 2020 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data datasets using Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes. Procedures studied included wedge resection; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; and open lobectomy, segmentectomy, and mediastinal and regional lymphadenectomy. Procedure markup ratio and coefficient of variation (CoV) was assessed and compared across procedure, region, and provider. The CoV, a measure of dispersion defined as the ratio of the SD to the mean, was likewise compared across procedure and region.

RESULTS

Median markup ratio across all procedures was 3.56 (interquartile range, 2.87-4.59) with right skew (mean, 4.13). Median markup ratio was 3.59 for lymphadenectomy (CoV, 0.51), 3.13 for open lobectomy (CoV, 0.45), 3.55 for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy (CoV, 0.59), 3.77 for segmentectomy (CoV, 0.74), and 3.80 for wedge resection (CoV, 0.67). Increased beneficiaries, services, and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System score (total) were associated with a decreased markup ratio ( < .0001). Markup ratio was highest in the Northeast at 4.14 (interquartile range, 3.09-5.56) and lowest in the South (Markup ratio 3.26; interquartile range, 2.68-4.02).

CONCLUSIONS

We observe geographic variation in surgical billing for thoracic surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估肺切除手术的费用加成(收费与成本之比),并考察不同地理区域的差异。

方法

使用医疗保健通用程序编码系统代码,从2015年至2020年医疗保险提供者利用和支付数据集中获取常见肺切除手术的提供者层面数据。研究的手术包括楔形切除术;电视辅助胸腔镜手术;以及开放性肺叶切除术、肺段切除术、纵隔和区域淋巴结清扫术。评估并比较了不同手术、地区和提供者的费用加成率和变异系数(CoV)。变异系数是一种离散度指标,定义为标准差与均值之比,同样也在不同手术和地区之间进行了比较。

结果

所有手术的中位费用加成率为3.56(四分位间距,2.87 - 4.59),呈右偏态(均值,4.13)。淋巴结清扫术的中位费用加成率为3.59(CoV,0.51),开放性肺叶切除术为3.13(CoV,0.45),电视辅助胸腔镜手术肺叶切除术为3.55(CoV,0.59),肺段切除术为3.77(CoV,0.74),楔形切除术为3.80(CoV,0.67)。受益人数增加、服务量增加以及医疗保健通用程序编码系统总分增加与费用加成率降低相关(P <.0001)。费用加成率在东北部最高,为4.14(四分位间距,3.09 - 5.56),在南部最低(费用加成率3.26;四分位间距,2.68 - 4.02)。

结论

我们观察到胸外科手术计费存在地理差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d65/10329030/0fde971ebe06/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d65/10329030/f22198ebfb20/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d65/10329030/ee121af228fb/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d65/10329030/d90fbe68c15f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d65/10329030/15cf4dd2859b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d65/10329030/0af99e954180/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d65/10329030/0fde971ebe06/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d65/10329030/f22198ebfb20/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d65/10329030/ee121af228fb/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d65/10329030/d90fbe68c15f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d65/10329030/15cf4dd2859b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d65/10329030/0af99e954180/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d65/10329030/0fde971ebe06/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgical markup in lung cancer resection, 2015-2020.2015 - 2020年肺癌切除术的手术标记
JTCVS Open. 2023 May 9;14:538-545. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.04.020. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
The Price of Otologic Procedures: Variation in Markup by Surgical Procedure and Geography in the United States.耳科学手术价格:美国手术和地理位置的加价差异。
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Sep 1;42(8):1184-1191. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003151.
3
Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United States.美国肺癌患者接受微创切除时机器人手术和电视辅助胸腔镜手术的使用趋势及围手术期结局
JTCVS Open. 2022 Aug 18;12:385-398. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.07.014. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
The price of surgery: markup of operative procedures in the United States.手术的价格:美国手术操作的加价情况
J Surg Res. 2017 Feb;208:192-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.09.032. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
Variation in Emergency Department vs Internal Medicine Excess Charges in the United States.美国急诊科与内科超额收费的差异。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1139-1145. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1598.
6
The Markup on Orthopaedic Services: An Analysis of 2014-2019 Medicare Data and the Potential for Surprise Billing.骨科服务的加价:对 2014-2019 年医疗保险数据的分析及对意外计费的潜在影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Feb 15;105(4):330-338. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01484. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
7
Minimally invasive open surgery (MIOS) for clinical stage I lung cancer: diversity in minimally invasive procedures.临床Ⅰ期肺癌的微创开胸手术(MIOS):微创术式的多样性。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Nov 1;51(11):1649-1655. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyab128.
8
Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: long-term results of lobectomy versus sublobar resection from the Polish National Lung Cancer Registry.I 期非小细胞肺癌:波兰国家肺癌登记处肺叶切除术与亚肺叶切除术的长期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Aug 1;52(2):363-369. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx092.
9
Variability in Excess Lobectomy Billing Among US Thoracic Surgeons.美国胸外科医生超额肺叶切除术计费的变异性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):7492-7498. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13940-3. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
10
Thoracoscopic segmentectomy versus lobectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis.胸腔镜肺段切除术与肺叶切除术:倾向评分匹配分析
JTCVS Open. 2022 Jan 22;9:268-278. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.01.009. eCollection 2022 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospitals with decreasing cost-to-charge ratios bill greater surgical charges for similar outcomes.成本与收费比降低的医院对类似的治疗结果收取更高的手术费用。
Surgery. 2024 Oct;176(4):1123-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.06.018. Epub 2024 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

1
The Long, Slow Road to Lung Cancer Cure.
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;7(12):1765-1767. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4711.
2
Out-of-Network Bills for Privately Insured Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery With In-Network Primary Surgeons and Facilities.有保险的患者选择网络内医生和机构进行择期手术时的网络外账单。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 11;323(6):538-547. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.21463.
3
State-Level Variations in the Utilization of Lung Cancer Screening Among Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries: An Analysis of the 2015 to 2017 Physician and Other Supplier Data.医疗保险按服务收费受益人的肺癌筛查利用情况在州一级的差异:对 2015 年至 2017 年医师和其他供应商数据的分析。
Chest. 2020 Apr;157(4):1012-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
4
Who Will be the Costliest Patients? Using Recent Claims to Predict Expensive Surgical Episodes.谁将成为最昂贵的患者?利用最近的索赔数据预测昂贵的手术案例。
Med Care. 2019 Nov;57(11):869-874. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001204.
5
Hospital Variation in Spending for Lung Cancer Resection in Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群肺癌切除术的医院支出差异
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Dec;108(6):1710-1716. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.048. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
6
Do the surgical results in the National Lung Screening Trial reflect modern thoracic surgical practice?国家肺癌筛查试验的手术结果是否反映了现代胸外科实践?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):2038-2046.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.139. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
7
Treatment capacity required for full-scale implementation of lung cancer screening in the United States.美国全面实施肺癌筛查所需的治疗能力。
Cancer. 2019 Jun 15;125(12):2039-2048. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32026. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
8
The Landscape of US Lung Cancer Screening Services.美国肺癌筛查服务全景
Chest. 2019 May;155(5):900-907. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.039. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
9
Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography in the United States-2010 to 2015.美国的低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查——2010 年至 2015 年。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;3(9):1278-1281. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6416.
10
SOURCES OF GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN HEALTH CARE: EVIDENCE FROM PATIENT MIGRATION.医疗保健地理差异的来源:患者迁移的证据。
Q J Econ. 2016 Nov;131(4):1681-1726. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjw023. Epub 2016 Jul 19.