• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性对基于人工智能(AI)的技术在精神卫生保健中的应用的看法。

Women's perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies in mental healthcare.

作者信息

Reading Turchioe Meghan, Harkins Sarah, Desai Pooja, Kumar Shiveen, Kim Jessica, Hermann Alison, Joly Rochelle, Zhang Yiye, Pathak Jyotishman, Benda Natalie C

机构信息

Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

JAMIA Open. 2023 Jul 8;6(3):ooad048. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad048. eCollection 2023 Oct.

DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad048
PMID:37425486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10329494/
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate women's attitudes towards artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies used in mental health care. We conducted a cross-sectional, online survey of U.S. adults reporting female sex at birth focused on bioethical considerations for AI-based technologies in mental healthcare, stratifying by previous pregnancy. Survey respondents ( = 258) were open to AI-based technologies in mental healthcare but concerned about medical harm and inappropriate data sharing. They held clinicians, developers, healthcare systems, and the government responsible for harm. Most reported it was "very important" for them to understand AI output. More previously pregnant respondents reported being told AI played a small role in mental healthcare was "very important" versus those not previously pregnant ( = .03). We conclude that protections against harm, transparency around data use, preservation of the patient-clinician relationship, and patient comprehension of AI predictions may facilitate trust in AI-based technologies for mental healthcare among women.

摘要

本研究旨在评估女性对心理健康护理中使用的人工智能(AI)技术的态度。我们对出生时报告为女性性别的美国成年人进行了一项横断面在线调查,重点关注心理健康护理中基于AI技术的生物伦理考量,并按既往妊娠情况进行分层。调查受访者(n = 258)对心理健康护理中基于AI的技术持开放态度,但担心医疗伤害和不适当的数据共享。他们认为临床医生、开发者、医疗保健系统和政府应对伤害负责。大多数人报告说,对他们来说理解AI输出“非常重要”。与未怀孕的受访者相比,更多有过妊娠经历的受访者报告说被告知AI在心理健康护理中发挥小作用“非常重要”(p = .03)。我们得出结论,防范伤害、数据使用的透明度、患者 - 临床医生关系的维护以及患者对AI预测的理解,可能有助于女性对心理健康护理中基于AI的技术产生信任。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7050/10329494/f22923eb2bab/ooad048f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7050/10329494/e5578757ebb2/ooad048f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7050/10329494/5b5cab8b6165/ooad048f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7050/10329494/f22923eb2bab/ooad048f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7050/10329494/e5578757ebb2/ooad048f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7050/10329494/5b5cab8b6165/ooad048f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7050/10329494/f22923eb2bab/ooad048f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Women's perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies in mental healthcare.女性对基于人工智能(AI)的技术在精神卫生保健中的应用的看法。
JAMIA Open. 2023 Jul 8;6(3):ooad048. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad048. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Exploring perceptions of healthcare technologies enabled by artificial intelligence: an online, scenario-based survey.探索人工智能赋能的医疗保健技术的认知:基于情景的在线调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jul 20;21(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01586-8.
3
Theory of trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence technology (TrAAIT): An instrument to assess clinician trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence.信任和接受人工智能技术理论(TrAAIT):一种评估临床医生对人工智能信任和接受程度的工具。
J Biomed Inform. 2023 Dec;148:104550. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104550. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
4
Pragmatic AI-augmentation in mental healthcare: Key technologies, potential benefits, and real-world challenges and solutions for frontline clinicians.精神卫生保健中的实用人工智能增强:关键技术、潜在益处以及一线临床医生面临的现实挑战与解决方案
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 6;13:990370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.990370. eCollection 2022.
5
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) based decision support systems in mental health: An integrative review.人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)在心理健康中的决策支持系统:综合评价。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Aug;32(4):966-978. doi: 10.1111/inm.13114. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
6
Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis.多利益相关方对人工智能在医疗保健中的应用的偏好:系统评价和主题分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116357. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116357. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
7
Understanding the integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare organisations and systems through the NASSS framework: a qualitative study in a leading Canadian academic centre.通过 NASSS 框架理解人工智能在医疗保健组织和系统中的整合:在加拿大领先的学术中心进行的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 3;24(1):701. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11112-x.
8
Women's perceptions and attitudes towards the use of AI in mammography in Sweden: a qualitative interview study.瑞典女性对乳腺 X 光摄影中使用人工智能的看法和态度:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 14;14(2):e084014. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084014.
9
A survey of pregnant patients' perspectives on the implementation of artificial intelligence in clinical care.一项关于孕妇对人工智能在临床护理中实施的看法的调查。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Dec 13;30(1):46-53. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac200.
10
Defining acceptable data collection and reuse standards for queer artificial intelligence research in mental health: protocol for the online PARQAIR-MH Delphi study.定义心理健康 queer 人工智能研究中可接受的数据收集和再利用标准:在线 PARQAIR-MH Delphi 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 15;14(3):e079105. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079105.

引用本文的文献

1
Public trust of AI in healthcare in South Africa: results of a survey.南非医疗保健领域人工智能的公众信任度:一项调查结果
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Aug 25;26(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01272-8.
2
Patient trust in the use of machine learning-based clinical decision support systems in psychiatric services: A randomized survey experiment.患者对精神科服务中基于机器学习的临床决策支持系统的使用信任:一项随机调查实验。
Eur Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 25;67(1):e72. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1790.
3
A Cross-sectional Study of Patient Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: A Comparison of Somatic Versus Mental Health Care.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital mental health for postpartum women: perils, pitfalls, and promise.产后女性的数字心理健康:风险、陷阱与前景。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Jan 26;6(1):11. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00756-4.
2
Women's perceptions and attitudes to the use of AI in breast cancer screening: a survey in a cancer referral centre.女性对人工智能在乳腺癌筛查中应用的认知和态度:癌症转诊中心的一项调查。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Jan 1;96(1141):20220569. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220569. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
3
A survey of pregnant patients' perspectives on the implementation of artificial intelligence in clinical care.
患者对人工智能看法的横断面研究:躯体健康护理与精神健康护理的比较
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar;40(4):977-979. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09090-1. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
4
Patient Perspectives on AI for Mental Health Care: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.患者对精神健康护理中人工智能的看法:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Sep 18;11:e58462. doi: 10.2196/58462.
5
Recentering responsible and explainable artificial intelligence research on patients: implications in perinatal psychiatry.将负责任且可解释的人工智能研究重心重新置于患者身上:对围产期精神病学的影响
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 18;14:1321265. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1321265. eCollection 2023.
一项关于孕妇对人工智能在临床护理中实施的看法的调查。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Dec 13;30(1):46-53. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac200.
4
Perspectives of Patients About Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.患者对医疗保健中人工智能的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2210309. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10309.
5
AI in health and medicine.人工智能在医疗中的应用。
Nat Med. 2022 Jan;28(1):31-38. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01614-0. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
6
Health chatbots acceptability moderated by perceived stigma and severity: A cross-sectional survey.健康聊天机器人的可接受性受感知耻辱感和严重程度的调节:一项横断面调查。
Digit Health. 2021 Dec 8;7:20552076211063012. doi: 10.1177/20552076211063012. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
7
Filling gaps in trustworthy development of AI.填补人工智能可信发展中的空白。
Science. 2021 Dec 10;374(6573):1327-1329. doi: 10.1126/science.abi7176. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
8
Risky business: a scoping review for communicating results of predictive models between providers and patients.风险业务:关于在医疗服务提供者与患者之间传达预测模型结果的范围审查
JAMIA Open. 2021 Nov 12;4(4):ooab092. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab092. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Barriers and facilitators to engagement with artificial intelligence (AI)-based chatbots for sexual and reproductive health advice: a qualitative analysis.参与基于人工智能 (AI) 的聊天机器人获取性与生殖健康建议的障碍和促进因素:定性分析。
Sex Health. 2021 Nov;18(5):385-393. doi: 10.1071/SH21123.
10
Public vs physician views of liability for artificial intelligence in health care.公众和医生对医疗人工智能责任的看法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 14;28(7):1574-1577. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab055.