Quave Amber, Ayutyanont Napatkamon, Akhondi Hossein
MountainView Hospital-GME Consortium Las Vegas, NV.
HCA Healthcare Graduate Medical Education, Far West Division, Las Vegas, NV.
HCA Healthc J Med. 2022 Feb 26;3(1):13-22. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1367. eCollection 2022.
While medical school graduates compete to get matched into the best residency programs, programs also compete to attract the best applicants. The applicant's decision to rank their programs of interest is determined by several factors, many of which are not always apparent.
This study aimed to evaluate significant factors involved in an applicant's residency program selection. A 12-question survey was sent between June 2020 and September 2020 to all first-year internal medicine residents in the United States (US) through an online national database of residencies using the Survey Monkey platform. We asked them to rank the most significant factors that enticed or deterred them from choosing a specific program. We also compared domestic with international medical graduate (IMG) average ranked responses wherein differences were evaluated using an independent two mean samples t-test. The association between outcomes and predictors was analyzed using Pearson's correlation and chi-square analysis.
Out of 9,127 residents, 102 responded to the survey, which equaled a 1.11% response rate. The findings showed that the location, culture, and organization of a program are high-value factors for applicants. Salary, the number of cases seen, and friends near the residency location were not.There are statistically significant differences between graduates of US medical schools and IMG applicants, with the former placing higher importance on the quality of life during residency. Male and female residents also have different priorities with the latter emphasizing program culture and work environment improvement.Residents who chose programs based on academic competitiveness also placed significance on the prestige of the program (r = 0.418, P < .001), program organization/structure (r = 0.3, = .006), fellowship match rate (r = 0.307, = .006) and word of mouth (r = 0.520, < .001). Residents who chose programs based on program culture also put an emphasis on the perceived happiness of the residents (r = 0.450, = 0.001), and work-life balance (r = 0.359, = .004).
Programs can attract stronger applicants if they emphasize modifiable factors that are important to potential residents.
医学院毕业生竞相争取进入最佳住院医师培训项目,而这些项目也在竞争以吸引最优秀的申请者。申请者对其感兴趣的项目进行排名的决定受多种因素影响,其中许多因素并不总是显而易见的。
本研究旨在评估申请者选择住院医师培训项目所涉及的重要因素。2020年6月至2020年9月期间,通过在线全国住院医师数据库,利用Survey Monkey平台向美国所有一年级内科住院医师发送了一份包含12个问题的调查问卷。我们要求他们对吸引或阻碍他们选择特定项目的最重要因素进行排名。我们还比较了国内医学毕业生与国际医学毕业生的平均排名回复,其中差异使用独立双样本t检验进行评估。使用Pearson相关性分析和卡方分析来分析结果与预测因素之间的关联。
在9127名住院医师中,102人回复了调查问卷,回复率为1.11%。研究结果表明,项目的地点、文化和组织对申请者来说是高价值因素。薪资、所诊治病例数量以及住院医师培训地点附近的朋友则不是。美国医学院毕业生与国际医学毕业生申请者之间存在统计学显著差异,前者更看重住院医师培训期间的生活质量。男性和女性住院医师也有不同的优先考虑因素,后者更强调项目文化和工作环境的改善。基于学术竞争力选择项目的住院医师也看重项目的声誉(r = 0.418,P <.001)、项目组织/结构(r = 0.3,P =.006)、专科匹配率(r = 0.307,P =.006)和口碑(r = 0.520,P <.001)。基于项目文化选择项目的住院医师还强调住院医师的幸福感(r = 0.450,P = 0.001)和工作与生活的平衡(r = 0.359,P =.004)。
如果项目强调对潜在住院医师重要的可改变因素,就能吸引更优秀的申请者。