• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人数字门诊服务:一项多中心非随机对照试验的干预措施与方案制定

Digital Outpatient Services for Adults: Development of an Intervention and Protocol for a Multicenter Non-Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Holmen Heidi, Holm Are Martin, Kilvær Thomas Karsten, Ljoså Tone Marte, Granan Lars-Petter, Ekholdt Christopher, Larsen Lotte Sandberg, Fosse Erik

机构信息

Intervention Centre, Division of Technology and Innovation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 10;12:e46649. doi: 10.2196/46649.

DOI:10.2196/46649
PMID:37428533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10366969/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health care services are being challenged by an increasing number of patients and limited resources. Hence, research investigating options to reduce costs and increase effectiveness is warranted. Digital outpatient services can provide flexible and tailored follow-up, improve patients' health literacy, and facilitate the identification of adverse courses of disease. However, previous research largely focused on disease-specific contexts and outcomes. Therefore, research on digital services investigating generic outcomes such as health literacy is warranted.

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to describe the "digital outpatient service" intervention and present the protocol for an ongoing multicenter, nonrandomized trial evaluating this intervention.

METHODS

Based on previous experiences and evidence-based knowledge, we developed this intervention through patient-journey maps in collaboration with each clinical specialty. The patients gain access to a mobile app for self-monitoring and patient-reported outcomes and a chat for contact between the patients and health care workers. The health care workers' dashboard includes a traffic light system to draw attention to the most urgent patient reports. In this multicenter, non-randomized controlled trial, patients are allocated to the control group receiving standard care or the 6-month intervention. Eligible patients are aged 18 years or older who receive outpatient care at the neurology, lung, pain, or cancer departments at 2 university hospitals in Norway. Our evaluation will include patient-reported outcomes, qualitative interviews, and clinical measures. The primary outcome will be health literacy using the Health Literacy Questionnaire. A sample size of 165 participants is split into a 1:2 ratio in favor of the intervention. We will analyze quantitative data in SPSS (IBM Corp) using descriptive statistics and logistic regression, and qualitative data using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

This trial started in September 2021, and the intervention started in January 2022. Recruitment has ended, with 55 patients in the control group and 107 patients in the intervention group. Follow-up is expected to end in July 2023, with results expected to be obtained in December 2023.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will evaluate an intervention facilitated by an already certified digital multicomponent solution, with intervention content based on patient-reported outcomes, health literacy, and self-monitoring. The intervention is specifically tailored to each participating center and the needs of their patients using patient journey maps. The comprehensive and generic evaluation of this digital outpatient service intervention is a strength as it targets a heterogeneous sample of patients. Thus, this study will provide important knowledge about the applicability and effects of digital health care services. As a result, patients and health care workers will gain a new, evidence-based understanding of whether and how digital tools may be used in clinical care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05068869; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05068869.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/46649.

摘要

背景

医疗保健服务正面临着患者数量不断增加和资源有限的挑战。因此,有必要开展研究来探索降低成本和提高效率的方法。数字门诊服务可以提供灵活且个性化的随访,提高患者的健康素养,并有助于识别疾病的不良病程。然而,以往的研究主要集中在特定疾病的背景和结果上。因此,有必要开展关于数字服务的研究,以调查诸如健康素养等一般性结果。

目的

本文旨在描述“数字门诊服务”干预措施,并介绍一项正在进行的多中心、非随机试验的方案,该试验旨在评估这一干预措施。

方法

基于以往的经验和循证知识,我们与各临床专科合作,通过患者旅程地图开发了这一干预措施。患者可以使用一款移动应用程序进行自我监测并报告患者相关结果,还可以通过聊天功能与医护人员进行联系。医护人员的仪表板包括一个交通信号灯系统,以提醒注意最紧急的患者报告。在这项多中心、非随机对照试验中,患者被分配到接受标准护理的对照组或接受为期6个月干预的试验组。符合条件的患者年龄在18岁及以上,他们在挪威的2所大学医院的神经科、肺部、疼痛科或癌症科接受门诊治疗。我们的评估将包括患者报告的结果、定性访谈和临床测量。主要结果将使用健康素养问卷来衡量健康素养。165名参与者的样本量按照1:2的比例分配,以支持干预组。我们将使用描述性统计和逻辑回归在SPSS(IBM公司)中分析定量数据,并使用主题分析分析定性数据。

结果

该试验于2021年9月开始,干预措施于2022年1月开始。招募工作已经结束,对照组有55名患者,干预组有107名患者。随访预计于2023年7月结束,结果预计于2023年12月获得。

结论

本研究将评估一种由已获认证的数字多组件解决方案推动的干预措施,其干预内容基于患者报告的结果、健康素养和自我监测。该干预措施通过患者旅程地图专门针对每个参与中心及其患者的需求进行了定制。对这种数字门诊服务干预措施进行全面和一般性评估是一项优势,因为它针对的是异质性患者样本。因此,本研究将提供关于数字医疗服务的适用性和效果的重要知识。结果,患者和医护人员将对数字工具是否以及如何用于临床护理获得新的、基于证据的理解。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05068869;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05068869。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/46649。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bee/10366969/42c520268611/resprot_v12i1e46649_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bee/10366969/7df12747c657/resprot_v12i1e46649_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bee/10366969/2737740b320c/resprot_v12i1e46649_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bee/10366969/42c520268611/resprot_v12i1e46649_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bee/10366969/7df12747c657/resprot_v12i1e46649_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bee/10366969/2737740b320c/resprot_v12i1e46649_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bee/10366969/42c520268611/resprot_v12i1e46649_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital Outpatient Services for Adults: Development of an Intervention and Protocol for a Multicenter Non-Randomized Controlled Trial.成人数字门诊服务:一项多中心非随机对照试验的干预措施与方案制定
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 10;12:e46649. doi: 10.2196/46649.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Evaluation of the My Diabetes Care Patient Portal Intervention: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.“我的糖尿病护理患者门户干预措施评估:一项试点随机对照试验方案”
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 May 25;10(5):e25955. doi: 10.2196/25955.
4
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Combined Digital Platform and Community Health Worker Intervention for Patients With Heart Failure: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.数字平台与社区卫生工作者联合干预对心力衰竭患者的可行性、可接受性及初步有效性:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 6;13:e55687. doi: 10.2196/55687.
5
Mobile App Promoting Resilience in Stress Management for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.移动应用程序促进青少年和青年癌症患者压力管理中的韧性:一项试点随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jul 30;13:e57950. doi: 10.2196/57950.
6
Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.用于评估非住院轻中度 COVID-19 患者肠道微生物组调节的自然史和影响的虚拟化临床研究:一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性研究,平行组研究评估 KB109 对肠道微生物组结构和功能的生理影响:一项随机对照研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05157-0.
7
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Codeveloped e-Mental Health Intervention for University Students: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.评估一种共同开发的针对大学生的电子心理健康干预措施的有效性:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Aug 30;12:e49364. doi: 10.2196/49364.
8
Reducing Cannabis Use in Young Adults With Psychosis Using iCanChange, a Mobile Health App: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (ReCAP-iCC).使用移动健康应用程序iCanChange减少患有精神病的年轻人的大麻使用:一项试点随机对照试验(ReCAP-iCC)的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Nov 25;11(11):e40817. doi: 10.2196/40817.
9
A Medicoeconomic Evaluation of a Telehealth Platform for Elective Outpatient Surgeries: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对择期门诊手术的远程医疗平台的医学经济学评估:随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Apr 24;12:e44006. doi: 10.2196/44006.
10
Digital Intervention (Keep-On-Keep-Up Nutrition) to Improve Nutrition in Older Adults: Protocol for a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.数字干预(Keep-On-Keep-Up 营养)改善老年人营养状况的可行性随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 30;13:e50922. doi: 10.2196/50922.

引用本文的文献

1
A Digital Outpatient Service With a Mobile App for Tailored Care and Health Literacy in Adults With Long-Term Health Service Needs: Multicenter Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.一项针对有长期医疗服务需求的成年人的数字化门诊服务,该服务通过移动应用程序提供个性化护理和健康素养提升:多中心非随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 28;27:e60343. doi: 10.2196/60343.

本文引用的文献

1
Home monitoring of physiology and symptoms to detect interstitial lung disease exacerbations and progression: a systematic review.用于检测间质性肺疾病恶化和进展的生理及症状家庭监测:一项系统综述
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Dec 20;7(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00441-2021. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Enhancing the use of EHR systems for pragmatic embedded research: lessons from the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory.增强电子健康记录系统在实用嵌入式研究中的使用:来自 NIH 医疗保健系统研究协作中心的经验教训。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Nov 25;28(12):2626-2640. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab202.
3
Clinical Trials for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and the Role of Health Systems.
特发性肺纤维化的临床试验和卫生系统的作用。
Clin Chest Med. 2021 Jun;42(2):287-294. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2021.03.006.
4
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review.2019冠状病毒病大流行对医疗服务利用的影响:一项系统评价
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 16;11(3):e045343. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045343.
5
Changes in Health Literacy during the first year following a kidney transplantation: Using the Health Literacy Questionnaire.肾移植后第一年健康素养的变化:使用健康素养问卷。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jul;104(7):1814-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.028. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
6
What is the Prevalence of Low Health Literacy in European Union Member States? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.欧盟成员国健康素养低的流行率是多少?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):753-761. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06407-8. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
7
Remote symptom monitoring integrated into electronic health records: A systematic review.远程症状监测与电子健康记录的整合:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Nov 1;27(11):1752-1763. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa177.
8
Patient experiences with technology enabled care across healthcare settings- a systematic review.患者在医疗环境中体验技术支持的护理 - 系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):779. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05633-4.
9
Applying the Electronic Health Literacy Lens: Systematic Review of Electronic Health Interventions Targeted at Socially Disadvantaged Groups.运用电子健康素养视角:针对社会弱势群体的电子健康干预措施的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 13;22(8):e18476. doi: 10.2196/18476.
10
A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model.挪威版健康素养问卷的验证研究:一个稳健的九维度因素模型。
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Jun;49(4):471-478. doi: 10.1177/1403494820926428. Epub 2020 Jun 7.