College of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China.
Faculty of Materials and Manufacturing, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(37):87669-87684. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28622-6. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
Food waste (FW) treatment has attracted increasing attention since waste classification occurred in China. Analyzing the environmental and economic impacts of different FW treatment technologies is required. In this study, four FW treatments, i.e., anaerobic digestion, black soldier fly (BSF) bioconversion, composting, and landfill, were evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC). LCA results show that anaerobic digestion outperforms the other technologies, while LCC results indicate anaerobic digestion has the lowest economic benefits ($5.16) and landfill has the highest ($14.22). Bioconversion has the highest product revenue ($37.98). FW anaerobic digestion followed by treating digestate and waste crude oil was employed to investigate the environmental differences between waste classification and mixed incineration. Digestate gasification and conversion of waste crude oil to biodiesel are found to be environmentally friendly, and waste classification outperforms mixed incineration. Furthermore, we explored national-level environmental emission reduction with anaerobic digestion as the dominant technology via increasing resource utilization rate and applying household FW disposers. Results display that a 60% resource utilization rate decreases the overall environmental impact by 36.68% compared with current situation, and treating household FW separately at the source can further lead to emission reduction. This study provides a reference for selecting FW technologies for countries worldwide from environmental and economic perspectives, as well as a direction of resource utilization for how to reduce environmental emissions from treating the total FW produced by all humanity.
在中国实行垃圾分类后,厨余垃圾(FW)处理受到了越来越多的关注。需要分析不同 FW 处理技术的环境和经济影响。本研究采用生命周期评价(LCA)和生命周期成本(LCC)对四种 FW 处理方法,即厌氧消化、黑水虻(BSF)生物转化、堆肥和填埋进行了评估。LCA 结果表明,厌氧消化优于其他技术,而 LCC 结果表明,厌氧消化的经济效益最低(5.16 美元),填埋的经济效益最高(14.22 美元)。生物转化的产品收益最高(37.98 美元)。采用 FW 厌氧消化,然后处理消化液和废原油,研究了垃圾分类和混合焚烧之间的环境差异。发现消化液气化和废原油转化为生物柴油具有环境友好性,垃圾分类优于混合焚烧。此外,我们通过提高资源利用率和应用家用 FW 处理机,探讨了以厌氧消化为主导技术的全国范围内的环境减排。结果显示,与现状相比,资源利用率提高 60%可使整体环境影响降低 36.68%,而从源头对家用 FW 进行单独处理则可进一步实现减排。本研究从环境和经济角度为世界各国选择 FW 技术提供了参考,以及如何通过处理全人类产生的 FW 总量来减少环境排放的资源利用方向。