• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 2006 年和 1995 年之间极早产儿的行为结果:EPICure 研究。

Comparing behavioural outcomes in children born extremely preterm between 2006 and 1995: the EPICure studies.

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, George Davies Centre, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.

Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 May;33(5):1517-1528. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02258-w. Epub 2023 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00787-023-02258-w
PMID:37430147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11098736/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children born extremely preterm (EP) are at increased risk of neurocognitive and behavioural morbidity. Here, we investigate whether behavioural outcomes have changed over time concomitant with increasing survival following EP birth.

METHODS

Comparison of outcomes at 11 years of age for two prospective national cohorts of children born EP in 1995 (EPICure) and 2006 (EPICure2), assessed alongside term-born children. Behavioural outcomes were assessed using the parent-completed Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), DuPaul Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS), and Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ).

RESULTS

In EPICure, 176 EP and 153 term-born children were assessed (mean age: 10.9 years); in EPICure2, 112 EP and 143 term-born children were assessed (mean age: 11.8 years). In both cohorts, EP children had higher mean scores and more clinically significant difficulties than term-born children on almost all measures. Comparing outcomes for EP children in the two cohorts, there were no significant differences in mean scores or in the proportion of children with clinically significant difficulties after adjustment for confounders. Using term-born children as reference, EP children in EPICure2 had significantly higher SDQ total difficulties and ADHD-RS hyperactivity impulsivity z-scores than EP children in EPICure.

CONCLUSIONS

Behavioural outcomes have not improved for EP children born in 2006 compared with those born in 1995. Relative to term-born peers, EP children born in 2006 had worse outcomes than those born in 1995. There is an ongoing need for long-term clinical follow-up and psychological support for children born EP.

摘要

背景

极早产儿(EP)出生的儿童患神经认知和行为障碍的风险增加。在这里,我们研究了随着 EP 出生后存活率的提高,行为结果是否随时间发生了变化。

方法

比较了 1995 年(EPICure)和 2006 年(EPICure2)两个前瞻性全国 EP 儿童队列在 11 岁时的结局,同时评估了足月出生的儿童。行为结果使用父母完成的长处与困难问卷(SDQ)、DuPaul 注意缺陷多动障碍评定量表(ADHD-RS)和社会沟通问卷(SCQ)进行评估。

结果

在 EPICure 中,评估了 176 名 EP 和 153 名足月出生的儿童(平均年龄:10.9 岁);在 EPICure2 中,评估了 112 名 EP 和 143 名足月出生的儿童(平均年龄:11.8 岁)。在两个队列中,EP 儿童在几乎所有测量指标上的平均得分和临床显著困难的比例都高于足月出生的儿童。在调整混杂因素后,比较两个队列中 EP 儿童的结局,发现平均得分或具有临床显著困难的儿童比例没有显著差异。与足月出生的儿童相比,EPICure2 中 EP 儿童的 SDQ 总分困难和 ADHD-RS 多动冲动 z 评分显著高于 EPICure 中的 EP 儿童。

结论

与 1995 年出生的 EP 儿童相比,2006 年出生的 EP 儿童的行为结果没有改善。与 1995 年出生的儿童相比,2006 年出生的 EP 儿童的结局比 1995 年出生的儿童更差。对于 EP 出生的儿童,需要持续进行长期临床随访和心理支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccca/11098870/d55aacbcb007/787_2023_2258_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccca/11098870/4507154f5b37/787_2023_2258_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccca/11098870/058f34ac1a25/787_2023_2258_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccca/11098870/a9d3bd54eef9/787_2023_2258_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccca/11098870/d55aacbcb007/787_2023_2258_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccca/11098870/4507154f5b37/787_2023_2258_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccca/11098870/058f34ac1a25/787_2023_2258_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccca/11098870/a9d3bd54eef9/787_2023_2258_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccca/11098870/d55aacbcb007/787_2023_2258_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing behavioural outcomes in children born extremely preterm between 2006 and 1995: the EPICure studies.比较 2006 年和 1995 年之间极早产儿的行为结果:EPICure 研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 May;33(5):1517-1528. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02258-w. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
2
Comparing the Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders in Cohorts of Children Born Extremely Preterm in 1995 and 2006: The EPICure Studies.比较1995年和2006年极早产出生队列儿童的精神障碍患病率:EPICure研究
JAACAP Open. 2024 Sep;2(3):217-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.02.005.
3
Antecedents of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in Children Born Extremely Preterm.极早产儿儿童注意缺陷/多动障碍症状的前驱因素
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2016 May;37(4):285-97. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000298.
4
Disturbed sleep in children born extremely preterm is associated with behavioural and emotional symptoms.早产儿睡眠紊乱与行为和情绪症状有关。
Sleep Med. 2021 Sep;85:157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
5
Extremely preterm birth and autistic traits in young adulthood: the EPICure study.极早产与青年期自闭症特质:EPICure 研究。
Mol Autism. 2021 May 6;12(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13229-021-00414-0.
6
Growth in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: the EPICure studies.1995 年和 2006 年在英国出生的极早产儿的生长情况:EPICure 研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Mar;107(2):193-200. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-321107. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
7
Inattention in very preterm children: implications for screening and detection.早产儿注意力不集中:对筛查和检测的影响。
Arch Dis Child. 2014 Sep;99(9):834-9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305532. Epub 2014 May 19.
8
Impaired pulmonary function mediates inattention in young adults born extremely preterm.极早产儿的肺功能受损会导致其成年后出现注意力不集中的情况。
Acta Paediatr. 2023 Feb;112(2):254-260. doi: 10.1111/apa.16586. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
9
Reduced health-related quality of life in children born extremely preterm in 2006 compared with 1995: the EPICure Studies.2006 年出生的极早产儿健康相关生活质量较 1995 年降低:EPICure 研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Jul;107(4):408-413. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-322888. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
10
Psychiatric disorders in extremely preterm children: longitudinal finding at age 11 years in the EPICure study.极早产儿的精神障碍:EPICure 研究中 11 岁时的纵向发现。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 May;49(5):453-63.e1.

引用本文的文献

1
Heterogeneous, temporally consistent, and plastic brain development after preterm birth.早产后脑发育的异质性、时间上的一致性和可塑性。
Nat Commun. 2025 Sep 12;16(1):8269. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63967-1.
2
Trends Over Time in Cognitive Outcomes of Children Born Very Preterm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.极早产儿认知结局的长期趋势:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.2221.
3
Developmental trajectories of internalizing problems among individuals born very preterm/very low birthweight: early risk and resilience factors.

本文引用的文献

1
The prevalence and profile of autism in individuals born preterm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.早产儿中自闭症的患病率和特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurodev Disord. 2021 Sep 21;13(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s11689-021-09382-1.
2
Time trends in autism diagnosis over 20 years: a UK population-based cohort study.20 多年来自闭症诊断的时间趋势:一项英国基于人群的队列研究。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;63(6):674-682. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13505. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
3
Completeness of Retention Data and Determinants of Attrition in Birth Cohorts of Very Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.
极早产儿/极低出生体重儿内化问题的发展轨迹:早期风险和复原力因素
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s00787-025-02736-3.
4
Socioeconomic outcomes in very preterm/very low birth weight adults: individual participant data meta-analysis.极早产/极低出生体重成年人的社会经济结局:个体参与者数据荟萃分析
Pediatr Res. 2025 May 3. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-04082-1.
5
The Impact of Motivation on Sustained Attention in Very Preterm and Term-born Children: An ERP Study.动机对极早产儿和足月儿持续注意力的影响:一项事件相关电位研究
J Atten Disord. 2025 May;29(7):569-588. doi: 10.1177/10870547251313888. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
6
Mortality from external causes in late adolescence and early adulthood by gestational age and sex: a population-based cohort study in four Nordic countries.北欧四国基于人群的队列研究:按胎龄和性别划分的青少年晚期和成年早期的外部原因死亡率。
BMC Med. 2024 Nov 4;22(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03731-2.
7
Comparing the Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders in Cohorts of Children Born Extremely Preterm in 1995 and 2006: The EPICure Studies.比较1995年和2006年极早产出生队列儿童的精神障碍患病率:EPICure研究
JAACAP Open. 2024 Sep;2(3):217-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.02.005.
极早产儿出生队列中保留数据的完整性及失访的决定因素:一项系统综述
Front Pediatr. 2021 Feb 17;9:529733. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.529733. eCollection 2021.
4
No change in neurodevelopment at 11 years after extremely preterm birth.极早产儿出生 11 年后神经发育无变化。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 Jul;106(4):418-424. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320650. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
5
Have outcomes following extremely preterm birth improved over time?极早产儿出生后的结局是否随着时间的推移而改善?
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jun;25(3):101114. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2020.101114. Epub 2020 May 15.
6
What Do We Know About the Preterm Behavioral Phenotype? A Narrative Review.关于早产行为表型我们了解多少?一项叙述性综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 25;11:154. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00154. eCollection 2020.
7
Association Between Year of Birth and 1-Year Survival Among Extremely Preterm Infants in Sweden During 2004-2007 and 2014-2016.2004-2007 年和 2014-2016 年期间瑞典极度早产儿出生年份与 1 年生存率的关系。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 26;321(12):1188-1199. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2021.
8
A meta-analysis of neurodevelopmental outcomes at 4-10 years in children born at 22-25 weeks gestation.一项对孕 22-25 周早产儿在 4-10 岁时神经发育结局的荟萃分析。
Acta Paediatr. 2019 Jul;108(7):1237-1244. doi: 10.1111/apa.14693. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
9
Motor Impairment Trends in Extremely Preterm Children: 1991-2005.极早产儿运动功能障碍的变化趋势:1991-2005 年。
Pediatrics. 2018 Apr;141(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3410.
10
Cognitive Outcomes of Children Born Extremely or Very Preterm Since the 1990s and Associated Risk Factors: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression.20 世纪 90 年代以来极早产儿和极早产儿认知结局及其相关危险因素的 Meta 分析和 Meta 回归。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Apr 1;172(4):361-367. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5323.