Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jul 10;24(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02097-3.
Evidence suggests that management of people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in primary care has been suboptimal, in particular, with low referral rates to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a GP-physiotherapist partnership in optimising management of COPD in primary care.
A pragmatic, pilot, before and after study was conducted in four general practices in Australia. A senior cardiorespiratory physiotherapist was partnered with each general practice. Adults with a history of smoking and/or COPD, aged ≥ 40 years with ≥ 2 practice visits in the previous year were recruited following spirometric confirmation of COPD. Intervention was provided by the physiotherapist at the general practice and included PR referral, physical activity and smoking cessation advice, provision of a pedometer and review of inhaler technique. Intervention occurred at baseline, one month and three months. Main outcomes included PR referral and attendance. Secondary clinical outcomes included changes in COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, dyspnoea, health activation and pedometer step count. Process outcomes included count of initiation of smoking cessation interventions and review of inhaler technique.
A total of 148 participants attended a baseline appointment where pre/post bronchodilator spirometry was performed. 31 participants with airflow obstruction on post-bronchodilator spirometry (mean age 75yrs (SD 9.3), mean FEV% pred = 75% (SD 18.6), 61% female) received the intervention. At three months, 78% (21/27) were referred to PR and 38% (8/21) had attended PR. No significant improvements were seen in CAT scores, dyspnoea or health activation. There was no significant change in average daily step count at three months compared to baseline (mean difference (95% CI) -266 steps (-956 to 423), p = 0.43). Where indicated, all participants had smoking cessation interventions initiated and inhaler technique reviewed.
The results of this study suggest that this model was able to increase referrals to PR from primary care and was successful in implementing some aspects of COPD management, however, was insufficient to improve symptom scores and physical activity levels in people with COPD.
ANZCTR, ACTRN12619001127190. Registered 12 August 2019 - Retrospectively registered, http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12619001127190.aspx .
有证据表明,在初级保健中,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的管理一直不尽如人意,特别是肺康复(PR)的转诊率较低。本研究的目的是评估全科医生-物理治疗师合作在优化初级保健中 COPD 管理方面的效果。
在澳大利亚的四个全科诊所进行了一项实用的、试点的、前后对照研究。为每个全科诊所配备了一名高级心肺物理治疗师。招募了有吸烟史和/或 COPD 病史、年龄≥40 岁、过去一年有≥2 次就诊记录、经肺量计确认 COPD 的成年人。干预措施由全科诊所的物理治疗师提供,包括 PR 转诊、身体活动和戒烟建议、提供计步器和复查吸入器技术。干预发生在基线、一个月和三个月。主要结局包括 PR 转诊和参加情况。次要临床结局包括 COPD 评估测试(CAT)评分、呼吸困难、健康激活和计步器步数的变化。过程结局包括启动戒烟干预措施的次数和复查吸入器技术的次数。
共有 148 名参与者参加了基线预约,在该预约中进行了支气管扩张剂后肺量计检查。在支气管扩张剂后肺量计检查存在气流阻塞的 31 名参与者(平均年龄 75 岁(SD 9.3),平均 FEV%预计值=75%(SD 18.6),61%为女性)接受了干预。在三个月时,78%(27/34)被转诊至 PR,38%(21/55)参加了 PR。CAT 评分、呼吸困难或健康激活均未见显著改善。与基线相比,三个月时的平均每日步数没有显著变化(平均差值(95%CI)-266 步(-956 至 423),p=0.43)。在需要的情况下,所有参与者均开始了戒烟干预措施,并复查了吸入器技术。
本研究结果表明,这种模式能够增加初级保健中对 PR 的转诊,并成功实施了 COPD 管理的某些方面,但不足以改善 COPD 患者的症状评分和身体活动水平。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心,ACTRN12619001127190。注册日期:2019 年 8 月 12 日-回顾性注册,http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12619001127190.aspx。