• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于智能总谐波失真的配电网故障保护技术比较研究。

A Comparative Study of Smart THD-Based Fault Protection Techniques for Distribution Networks.

机构信息

Electric Engineering Department, Polytechnic University of Catalonia (EEBE-UPC), 08019 Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg University, 9200 Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 18;23(10):4874. doi: 10.3390/s23104874.

DOI:10.3390/s23104874
PMID:37430787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10220819/
Abstract

The integration of Distributed Generators (DGs) into distribution systems (DSs) leads to more reliable and efficient power delivery for customers. However, the possibility of bi-directional power flow creates new technical problems for protection schemes. This poses a threat to conventional strategies because the relay settings have to be adjusted depending on the network topology and operational mode. As a solution, it is important to develop novel fault protection techniques to ensure reliable protection and avoid unnecessary tripping. In this regard, Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) can be used as a key parameter for evaluating the grid's waveform quality during fault events. This paper presents a comparison between two DS protection strategies that employ THD levels, estimated amplitude voltages, and zero-sequence components as instantaneous indicators during the faults that function as a kind of fault sensor to detect, identify, and isolate faults. The first method uses a Multiple Second Order Generalized Integrator (MSOGI) to obtain the estimated variables, whereas the second method uses a single SOGI for the same purpose (SOGI-THD). Both methods rely on communication lines between protective devices (PDs) to facilitate coordinated protection. The effectiveness of these methods is assessed by using simulations in MATLAB/Simulink considering various factors such as different types of faults and DG penetrations, different fault resistances and fault locations in the proposed network. Moreover, the performance of these methods is compared with conventional overcurrent and differential protections. The results show that the SOGI-THD method is highly effective in detecting and isolating faults with a time interval of 6-8.5 ms using only three SOGIs while requiring only 447 processor cycles for execution. In comparison to other protection methods, the SOGI-THD method exhibits a faster response time and a lower computational burden. Furthermore, the SOGI-THD method is robust to harmonic distortion, as it considers pre-existing harmonic content before the fault and avoids interference with the fault detection process.

摘要

分布式发电(DG)与配电系统(DS)的集成,为客户提供了更可靠、更高效的电力输送。然而,双向功率流的可能性为保护方案带来了新的技术问题。这对传统策略构成了威胁,因为继电器的设置必须根据网络拓扑和运行模式进行调整。因此,开发新的故障保护技术来确保可靠的保护和避免不必要的跳闸是非常重要的。在这方面,总谐波失真(THD)可以用作评估故障期间电网波形质量的关键参数。本文比较了两种 DS 保护策略,它们使用 THD 水平、估计幅度电压和零序分量作为故障期间的瞬时指标,作为一种故障传感器,用于检测、识别和隔离故障。第一种方法使用多个二阶广义积分器(MSOGI)来获得估计变量,而第二种方法使用单个 SOGI 来实现相同的目的(SOGI-THD)。这两种方法都依赖于保护设备(PD)之间的通信线路来实现协调保护。通过在 MATLAB/Simulink 中进行仿真,考虑了不同类型的故障和 DG 渗透率、不同的故障电阻和建议网络中的故障位置等各种因素,评估了这些方法的有效性。此外,还将这些方法的性能与传统的过电流和差动保护进行了比较。结果表明,SOGI-THD 方法仅使用三个 SOGIs 就能在 6-8.5ms 的时间间隔内有效地检测和隔离故障,执行仅需 447 个处理器周期。与其他保护方法相比,SOGI-THD 方法具有更快的响应时间和更低的计算负担。此外,SOGI-THD 方法对谐波失真具有鲁棒性,因为它在故障前考虑了预先存在的谐波内容,并避免了故障检测过程中的干扰。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/aa823fd817f8/sensors-23-04874-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/b16bef220b89/sensors-23-04874-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/29bdc3842bf0/sensors-23-04874-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/fa18aa5ca227/sensors-23-04874-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/6d2c15270a58/sensors-23-04874-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/2c0e10f1b850/sensors-23-04874-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/0459f5284828/sensors-23-04874-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/0a30f1d2e72f/sensors-23-04874-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/f410dbe74d80/sensors-23-04874-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/e1c879385f65/sensors-23-04874-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/805c97addf6d/sensors-23-04874-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/22ef2eae60e9/sensors-23-04874-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/320491fb8246/sensors-23-04874-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/8d03a01ad036/sensors-23-04874-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/5c70ace037a5/sensors-23-04874-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/e28b3cd35b4c/sensors-23-04874-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/40aa280f0b64/sensors-23-04874-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/3a88ec06c19c/sensors-23-04874-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/6e9da1421962/sensors-23-04874-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/aa823fd817f8/sensors-23-04874-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/b16bef220b89/sensors-23-04874-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/29bdc3842bf0/sensors-23-04874-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/fa18aa5ca227/sensors-23-04874-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/6d2c15270a58/sensors-23-04874-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/2c0e10f1b850/sensors-23-04874-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/0459f5284828/sensors-23-04874-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/0a30f1d2e72f/sensors-23-04874-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/f410dbe74d80/sensors-23-04874-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/e1c879385f65/sensors-23-04874-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/805c97addf6d/sensors-23-04874-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/22ef2eae60e9/sensors-23-04874-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/320491fb8246/sensors-23-04874-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/8d03a01ad036/sensors-23-04874-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/5c70ace037a5/sensors-23-04874-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/e28b3cd35b4c/sensors-23-04874-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/40aa280f0b64/sensors-23-04874-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/3a88ec06c19c/sensors-23-04874-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/6e9da1421962/sensors-23-04874-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6410/10220819/aa823fd817f8/sensors-23-04874-g019.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparative Study of Smart THD-Based Fault Protection Techniques for Distribution Networks.基于智能总谐波失真的配电网故障保护技术比较研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 18;23(10):4874. doi: 10.3390/s23104874.
2
A THD-Based Fault Protection Method Using MSOGI-FLL Grid Voltage Estimator.基于 THD 的故障保护方法,利用 MSOGI-FLL 电网电压估算器。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 14;23(2):980. doi: 10.3390/s23020980.
3
A Secure Dual-Layer Fault Protection Strategy for Distribution Network with DERs: Enhancing Security in the Face of Communication Challenges.一种适用于含分布式能源资源(DERs)的配电网的安全双层故障保护策略:应对通信挑战增强安全性
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 6;24(4):1057. doi: 10.3390/s24041057.
4
Smart meter for the estimation of power quality indices based on second-order generalized integrator.基于二阶广义积分器的电能质量指标估计智能电表。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan 5. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31656-5.
5
Distributed generation adverse impact on the distribution networks protection and its mitigation.分布式发电对配电网保护的不利影响及其缓解措施。
Heliyon. 2022 May 31;8(6):e09624. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09624. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Evaluation of LVRT capability and stability analysis of VSC based advanced control approach for grid connected PV system under grid fault conditions.并网光伏系统在电网故障条件下基于VSC的先进控制方法的低电压穿越能力评估与稳定性分析
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 23;10(5):e26935. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26935. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
7
A Localized Transient-Based Fault Location Scheme for Distribution Systems.一种用于配电系统的基于局部暂态的故障定位方案。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 1;22(7):2723. doi: 10.3390/s22072723.
8
Distributed fault detection and isolation in second order networked systems in a cyber-physical environment.网络物理环境中二阶网络系统的分布式故障检测与隔离
ISA Trans. 2020 Aug;103:131-142. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
9
Incorporating Modern Fault Ride-Through Standards into the Short-Circuit Calculation of Distribution Networks.将现代故障穿越标准纳入配电网短路计算
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Oct 31;23(21):8868. doi: 10.3390/s23218868.
10
Machine Learning-Based Fault Location for Smart Distribution Networks Equipped with Micro-PMU.基于机器学习的微 PMU 智能配电网故障定位
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 26;22(3):945. doi: 10.3390/s22030945.

引用本文的文献

1
A Secure Dual-Layer Fault Protection Strategy for Distribution Network with DERs: Enhancing Security in the Face of Communication Challenges.一种适用于含分布式能源资源(DERs)的配电网的安全双层故障保护策略:应对通信挑战增强安全性
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 6;24(4):1057. doi: 10.3390/s24041057.

本文引用的文献

1
A THD-Based Fault Protection Method Using MSOGI-FLL Grid Voltage Estimator.基于 THD 的故障保护方法,利用 MSOGI-FLL 电网电压估算器。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 14;23(2):980. doi: 10.3390/s23020980.