Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Walsall Manor Hospital, Walsall, UK.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2023 Sep;42(7):1455-1469. doi: 10.1002/nau.25235. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is associated with long-term anal incontinence (AI). We aimed to address the following questions: (a) are women with major OASI (grade 3c and 4) at higher risk of developing AI when compared to women with minor OASI (grade 3a and 3b)? (b) is a fourth-degree tear more likely to cause AI over a third-degree tear?
A systematic literature search from inception until September 2022. We considered prospective and retrospective cohort studies, cross-sectional and case-control studies without language restrictions. The quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated to measure the effect of different grades of OASI.
Out of 22 studies, 8 were prospective cohort, 8 were retrospective cohort, and 6 were cross-sectional studies. Length of follow-up ranged from 1 month to 23 years, with the majority of the reports (n = 16) analysing data within 12-months postpartum. Third-degree tears evaluated were 6454 versus 764 fourth-degree tears. The risk of bias was low in 3, medium in 14 and high in 5 studies, respectively. Prospective studies showed that major tears are associated with a twofold risk of AI for major tears versus minor tears, while retrospective studies consistently showed a risk of fecal incontinence (FI) which was two- to fourfold higher. Prospective studies showed a trend toward worsening AI symptoms for fourth-degree tears, but this failed to reach statistical significance. Cross-sectional studies with long-term (≥5 years) follow-up showed that women with fourth-degree tear were more likely to develop AI, with an RR ranging from 1.4 to 2.2. Out of 3, 2 retrospective studies showed similar findings, but the follow-up was significantly shorter (≤1 year). Contrasting results were noted for FI rates, as only 5 out of 10 studies supported an association between fourth-degree tear and FI.
Most studies investigate bowel symptoms within few months from delivery. Data heterogeneity hindered a meaningful synthesis. Prospective cohort studies with adequate power and long-term follow-up should be performed to evaluate the risk of AI for each OASI subtype.
产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)与长期肛门失禁(AI)有关。我们旨在解决以下问题:(a)与轻度 OASI(3a 和 3b 级)相比,重度 OASI(3c 和 4 级)的女性发生 AI 的风险是否更高?(b)四度撕裂比三度撕裂更有可能导致 AI 吗?
从创建到 2022 年 9 月进行系统文献检索。我们考虑了前瞻性和回顾性队列研究、横断面和病例对照研究,没有语言限制。质量评估采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和 Joanna Briggs 研究所批判性评价清单。计算风险比(RR)来衡量不同 OASI 分级的效果。
在 22 项研究中,8 项为前瞻性队列研究,8 项为回顾性队列研究,6 项为横断面研究。随访时间从 1 个月到 23 年不等,大多数报告(n=16)分析了产后 12 个月内的数据。评估的三度撕裂为 6454 例,四度撕裂为 764 例。分别有 3 项、14 项和 5 项研究的偏倚风险为低、中、高。前瞻性研究表明,与轻度撕裂相比,重度撕裂发生 AI 的风险增加两倍,而回顾性研究一致表明粪便失禁(FI)的风险增加两到四倍。前瞻性研究表明,四度撕裂的 AI 症状有恶化趋势,但未达到统计学意义。长期(≥5 年)随访的横断面研究表明,四度撕裂的女性更有可能发生 AI,RR 范围为 1.4 至 2.2。在 3 项回顾性研究中,有 2 项研究得出了类似的发现,但随访时间明显更短(≤1 年)。FI 发生率的结果则相反,只有 10 项研究中的 5 项支持四度撕裂与 FI 之间的关联。
大多数研究在分娩后几个月内调查肠道症状。数据异质性阻碍了有意义的综合分析。应进行具有足够效力和长期随访的前瞻性队列研究,以评估每种 OASI 亚型发生 AI 的风险。