Brito Rui, Costa Diogo, Dias Carina, Cruz Patrícia, Barros Paula
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Santo António, Porto, PRT.
Cureus. 2023 Jun 9;15(6):e40192. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40192. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Over the years, chondroitin sulfate (CS) has been used as a slow-acting drug for the treatment of osteoarthritis, for the reduction of pain and improvement of function, and for its disease-modifying properties by limiting cartilage volume loss and joint space narrowing progression. However, there have been inconsistencies in published trials regarding clinical efficacy, with reports of a lack of significant effects compared to placebo. The therapeutic effects of chondroitin sulfate may depend on many variables, such as the source of origin, purity, and contamination with by-products. Another source of confusion may be related to the fact that CS is commonly combined with glucosamine, which makes it challenging to isolate the specific contribution of chondroitin to the therapeutic outcome. This is aggravated by the fact that CS supplements, used in many countries, are not regulated, and labels wrongly claim high levels of purity. Many of these inferior CS products may have been used in clinical trials, which may have had limited but significant results. This has led to recent recommendations to opt for higher-purity pharmacologic-grade CS for the treatment of OA. This article aims to provide an up-to-date view of the current literature regarding the biological effects and efficacy of CS and discusses the quality of available chondroitin sulfate supplements and the current direction in CS investigation. This review concludes that pharmacologic-grade CS supplements may have clinically significant benefits when properly standardized; however, high-quality evidence from properly designed clinical trials is still needed to draw definitive conclusions about clinical efficacy in osteoarthritis.
多年来,硫酸软骨素(CS)一直被用作治疗骨关节炎的慢效药物,用于减轻疼痛、改善功能,以及通过限制软骨体积损失和关节间隙狭窄进展来发挥其疾病修饰特性。然而,已发表的试验在临床疗效方面存在不一致之处,有报告称与安慰剂相比缺乏显著效果。硫酸软骨素的治疗效果可能取决于许多变量,如来源、纯度以及副产物污染情况。另一个造成混淆的原因可能与CS通常与氨基葡萄糖联合使用这一事实有关,这使得分离软骨素对治疗结果的具体贡献具有挑战性。许多国家使用的CS补充剂不受监管,标签错误地声称具有高纯度,这加剧了这种情况。许多这类劣质CS产品可能已用于临床试验,这些试验可能取得了有限但显著的结果。这导致最近有人建议选择更高纯度的药理级CS来治疗骨关节炎。本文旨在提供有关CS生物学效应和疗效的当前文献的最新观点,并讨论现有硫酸软骨素补充剂的质量以及CS研究的当前方向。本综述得出结论,药理级CS补充剂在适当标准化时可能具有临床上显著的益处;然而,仍需要来自设计合理的临床试验的高质量证据,以就其在骨关节炎中的临床疗效得出明确结论。